Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T17:36:38.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Environmentally-oriented Mode of Industrial Project Planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Thomas N. Gladwin  and
Michael G. Royston
Thomas N. Gladwin
Affiliation:
Environmental Management Faculty, Centre d'Etudes Industrielles, 4 chemin de Conches, 1231 Conches, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michael G. Royston
Affiliation:
Environmental Management Faculty, Centre d'Etudes Industrielles, 4 chemin de Conches, 1231 Conches, Geneva, Switzerland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent research has shown that many industrial projects are not being designed with the environment in mind. The intellectual exercise of thinking ‘what impact does this project have on the environment?’ has not yet been made an integral part of industrial project-planning. More thoughtful and informed planning is needed, for reasons of both sound environmental management and, increasingly, sound project economics. An environmentally-oriented mode of planning, in which inputs and means related to environmental concerns are carefully taken into account during the planning, is discussed. This mode represents a tentative summary statement of an emerging consensus. Its objective is to facilitate informed and socially desirable choice among alternative actions in such a manner that adverse environmental consequences will be avoided or at least minimized.

Environmentally-oriented planning requires that a new methodology, that of impact assessment, be fully integrated into the very fabric of planning. Impact assessment consists of three analytical functions: description, prediction, and evaluation. These functions can be translated into a series of tasks, which in their entirety constitute the full process of impact assessment. The process can be achieved operationally by incorporating environmental considerations into planning via five dimensions: multidisciplinary professional involvement, broad public participation, holistic thinking, systematic analysis, and continuous integration. Adoption and application of the process can be encouraged and/or facilitated by a number of internal organizational adjustments, or by external public-policy adjustments.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1975 , pp. 189 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Robert W. (1973). How companies respond to social demands. Harvard Business Review, 51, pp. 88–98.Google Scholar
Aharoni, Yair (1966). The Foreign Investment Decision Process. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts: xvii + 362 pp.Google Scholar
Anderson, Frederick R., assisted by Daniels, Robert H. (1973). NEPA in the Courts: A Legal Analysis of the National Environmental Policy Act. Johns Hopkins University Press, (for Resources for the Future) Baltimore, Maryland: xv + 324 pp.Google Scholar
Andrews, Richard N. L. (1973 a). Approaches to Impact Assessment: Comparison and Critique. Paper presented at the Short Course on Impact Assessment in Water Resourcec Planning, 9 June 1973, School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan: 46 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Andrews, Richard N. L. (1973 b). A philosophy of environmental impact assessment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 28, pp. 197–203.Google Scholar
Anshen, Melvin (1974). The socially responsible corporation: from concept to implementation. Pp. 1–22 in Managing the Socially Responsible Corporation (Ed. Anshen, Melvin). Macmillan, New York, N.Y.: x + 256 pp.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1974). The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Heinemann, London, England: xiii + 507 pp.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. Bruce (1973). Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment. Paper presented at the Engineering Foundation Conference on Preparation of Environmental Impact Statements, 29 August-3 August 1973, New England College, Henniker, New Hampshire: 21 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Bower, Joseph L. (1970). Managing the Resource Allocation Process: a Study of Corporate Planning and Investment. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts: xv + 363 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Sterling (1972). To Live On Earth: Man and His Environment in Perspective. A Resources for the Future Study. Mentor Books, New York, N.Y.: xx + 253 pp.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. (1972). In Defense of Earth: International Protection of the Biosphere. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana: x + 295 pp.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. (1974). Organizational and administrative aspects of environmental problems at the local, national, and international levels. Pp. 12–36 in Organization and Administration of Environmental Programmes. ST/ESA/16, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, N.Y.: v + 187 pp.Google Scholar
Carter, E. Eugene (1971). Project evaluations and firm decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 8, pp. 253–79.Google Scholar
Coates, Joseph F. (1971). Technology assessment: the benefits…the costs…the consequences. The Futurist, 5, pp. 225–31.Google Scholar
Committee for Economic Development (1974). More Effective Programs for A Cleaner Environment. A Statement on National Policy by the Research and Policy Committee, Committee for Economic Development, New York, N.Y.: 74 pp.Google Scholar
Commoner, Barry (1971). The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology. Bantam Books, New York, N.Y.: 343 pp.Google Scholar
Dickert, Thomas G. (1974). Methods for environmental impact assessment: a comparison. Pp. 127–43 in Environmental Impact Assessment: Guidelines and Commentary (Ed. Dickert, Thomas G. with Domeny, Katherine R.). University Extension, University of California, Berkeley, California: xi + 238 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dickert, Thomas G. & Sorenson, Jens C. (1974). Some suggestions on the content and organization of environmental impact statements. Pp. 35–53 in Environmental Impact Assessment: Guidelines and Commentary (Ed. Dickert, Thomas G. with Domeny, Katherine R.). University Extension, University of California, Berkeley, California: xi + 238 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Fischer, D. W. & Francis, G. R. (1974). Water resource development and environment: an approach to impact analysis. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 5, pp. 299–305.Google Scholar
Gladwin, Thomas N. (1975). The Role of Ecological Considerations in the Multinational Corporate Project Planning Process: A Comparative Study of North American- and Western European-based Petroleum, Chemicals and Metals Firms. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: xiv + 547 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gladwin, Thomas N. & Welles, John G. (1975). Environmental Policy and Multinational Corporate Strategy. Paper prepared for the Ford Foundation Symposium on the International Economic Dimensions of Environmental Management, 17 April 1975, New York University, New York, N.Y.: 60 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Hetman, François (1973). Society and the Assessment of Technology. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France: 420 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, Richard A. (1970). Corporate Organization for Pollution Control. Conference Board, New York, N.Y.: ii + 72 pp.Google Scholar
International Chamber of Commerce (1974). Environmental Guidelines for World Industry. Document No. 210/59, International Chamber of Commerce, Paris, France: 7 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Jones, Martin V. (1972). The methodology of technology assessment. The Futurist, 6, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
Kapp, K. William (1970). Environmental disruption and social costs: a challenge to economics. Kyklos, 23, pp. 833–48.Google Scholar
Kneese, Allen V. (1973). Management science, economics, and environmental science. Management Science, 19, pp. 1122–37.Google Scholar
Kreith, F. (1973). Lack of impact: environmental impact statements. Environment, 15, pp. 26–33.Google Scholar
Lund, Leonard (1974). Corporate Organization for Environmental Policy Making. Conference Board, New York, N.Y.: 50 pp.Google Scholar
M.McAllister, Donald McAllister, Donald (Ed.) (1973). Environment: A New Focus for Land-use Planning. RANN—Research Applied to National Needs, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.: xvi + 328 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
McEvoy, James III, (1972). Multi- and interdisciplinary research—problems of initiation, control, integration, and reward. Policy Sciences, 3, pp. 201–8.Google Scholar
Mitnick, Barry M. & Weiss, Charles Jr, (1974). The siting impasse and a rational choice model of regulatory behavior: an agency for power plant siting. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1, pp. 150–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortolano, Leonard (1973). Impact Assessment in Water Resources Planning. Paper presented at the Short Course on Impact Assessment in Water Resource Planning, 4 June 1973, School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan: 30 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (as N.P.) (1974). Whither ecologists? Environmental Conservation, 1(2), p.82.Google Scholar
Sax, Joseph L. (1970). Defending the Environment: A Handbook for Citizen Action. Vintage Books, New York, N.Y.: xix + 252 pp.Google Scholar
Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (cited as SCOPE) (1975). Environmental Impact Assessment: Principles and Procedures. SCOPE Workshop on Impact Studies in the Environment… Report No. 5, SCOPE, Toronto, Ontario: 160 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard Warren (1973). A theoretical basis for participatory planning. Policy Sciences, 4, pp. 275–95.Google Scholar
Strong, Maurice F. (1973). One year after Stockholm: an ecological approach to management. Foreign Affairs, 51, pp. 690–707.Google Scholar
Ward, Barbara & Dubos, René (1972). Only One Earth: The Care and Maintenance of A Small Planet. Penguin Books, Middlesex, England: 304 pp.Google Scholar
Welles, John G. (1973). Multinationals need new environmental strategies. Columbia Journal of World Business, 8, pp. 11–8.Google Scholar
Wheelwright, Steven C. (1973). Developing a corporate response to pollution control. European Business, No. 38, pp. 64–72.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred N. (1961). Adventures in Ideas (16th Printing). Macmillan, New York, N.Y.: xii + 392 pp.Google Scholar