Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:15:56.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using context in novel community-based natural resource management: landscapes of property, policy and place

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2010

DAVID J. BRUNCKHORST
DAVID J. BRUNCKHORST*
Affiliation:
Institute for Rural Futures, and UNESCO Centre for Bioregional Resource Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
*
*Correspondence: Dr David Brunckhorst e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Community based natural resource management (CBNRM) engages groups of citizens in collective action towards sustainable conservation and natural resource management (NRM) within and across various tenure regimes. Substantial differences exist between developing and developed countries in terms of conditions conducive to CBNRM. There are also contextual differences from national to local scales, across different ‘spaces’ and ‘places’ within each. This paper focuses on developed countries in deriving and synthesizing some concepts from systems theory and landscape ecology, with lessons from facilitating novel CBNRM arrangements. Understanding the landscape context of interacting levels and scales of social and ecological systems can inform institutional development of resilient CBNRM. Efforts to increase the scale and effectiveness of social-ecological sustainability can benefit from novel arrangements facilitating holistic integration of environmental conservation across levels of institutions of communities and government, including tenure regimes (type and ownership of resources as ‘property’). Property and policy, together with ‘place’ attachment of communities can be viewed within a landscape framework. Such a ‘landscape lens’ provides an interdisciplinary meld that is important to sustainable CBNRM, but sometimes forgotten (or avoided) in government planning, policy deliberation and action.

Keywords

CBNRMcross-propertycross-jurisdictioninstitutionslandscapepropertypolicyplace and spacesocial-ecological systemssustainability and resilience
Type
THEMATIC SECTION: Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 1)
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 37 , Issue 1: Thematic section. Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 1) , March 2010 , pp. 16 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armitage, D., Berkes, F. & Doubleday, N., eds (2007) Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Folke, C., eds (2003) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems. Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brunckhorst, D.J. (2000) Bioregional Planning: Resource Management Beyond the New Millennium. London, UK & Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Brunckhorst, D.J. (2002) Institutions to sustain ecological and social systems. Journal of Ecological Management and Restoration 3 (2): 109–117.Google Scholar
Brunckhorst, D.J. (2004) Turning points towards sustainability: integrative science and policy for novel (but real) landscape futures. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 2004: 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunckhorst, D.J. & Marshall, G.R. (2007) Designing robust common property regimes for collaboration towards rural sustainability. In: Sustainable Resource Use: Institutional Dynamics and Economics, ed. Larson, S. & Smajgl, A., pp. 179–207. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Brunckhorst, D., Bridgewater, P. & Parker, P. (1997) The UNESCO Biosphere Reserve program comes of age: learning by doing landscape models for a sustainable conservation. In: Conservation Outside Reserves, ed. Hale, P. & Lamb, D., pp. 176–182. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Brunckhorst, D., Coop, P. & Reeve, I. (2006) ‘Eco-civic’ optimisation: a nested framework for planning and managing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 72 (5): 117–134.Google Scholar
Brunckhorst, D., Reeve, I., Morley, P. & Bock, K. (2008) Strategic spatial governance: deriving social-ecological frameworks for managing landscapes and regions. In: Landscape Analysis and Visualisation: Spatial Models for Natural Resource Management and Planning, ed. Pettit, C., Cartwright, W., Bishop, I., Lowell, K., Pullar, D. & Duncan, D., pp. 253–276. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S.R., Armbrust, E.V., Arzberger, P.W., Chapin, F.S., Elser, J.J., Hackett, E.J., Ives, A.R., Kareiva, P.M., Leibold, M.A., Lundberg, P., Mangel, M., Merchant, N., Murdoch, W.W., Palmer, M.A., Peters, D.P.C., Pickett, S.T.A., Smith, K.K., Wall, D.H., Zimmerman, A.S. (2009) Accelerate synthesis in ecology and environmental sciences. BioScience 59 (8): 699–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A.S., Kruger, L.E. & Daniels, S.E. (2003) ‘Place’ as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources 16 (2): 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jager, J. & Mitchell, R.B. (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences (USA) 100 (14): 8086–8091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, J. (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York, NY, USA: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Duit, A. & Galaz, V. (2008) Governance and complexity: emerging issues for governance theory. Governance 21 (3): 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, C., Folke, C., Cundill, G. & Schultz, L. (2007) Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society 12 (1): 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyfogle, E.T. (1998) Bounded People, Boundless Lands. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L., Holling, C. & Light, S. (1995) Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Imhoff, D. (2003) Farming with the Wild. San Francisco, CA, USA: Sierra Club Books, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, N., Swanson, F., Herring, M. & Greene, S. (1999) Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Knight, R. & White, C. (2008) Conservation for a New Generation. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, G.R. (2008) Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. International Journal of the Commons 2 (1): 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. (1977) The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science 195: 1289–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Hahn, T. (2004) Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9 (4): 2 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 15181–15187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, E., Diez, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, C., Stonich, S. & Weber, E., eds (2002) The Drama of the Commons. Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Pfueller, S.L. (2008) Role of bioregionalism in Bookmark Biosphere Reserve, Australia. Environmental Conservation 35 (2): 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, R. & Armitage, D. (2007) Crossing boundaries, crossing scales: the evolution of environment and resource co-management. Geography Compass 1/4 (2007): 834–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J. (2007) The Earth Only Endures. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Sandström, C. (2009) Institutional dimensions of comanagement: participation, power and process. Society and Natural Resources 22: 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, C.M. (2001) Re-examining local and market-orientated use of wild species for the conservation of biodiversity. Environmental Conservation 28 (3): 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, C.M., Shackleton, S.E. & Cousins, B. (2001) The role of land-based strategies in rural livelihoods: the contribution of arable production, animal husbandry and natural resource harvesting. Development Southern Africa 18: 581–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman, R.C. (2003) Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources 16 (8): 671–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. & Salt, D. (2006) Resilience Thinking. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, S., Brunckhorst, D. & Kelly, G. (2003) Reinventing the Common: Cross-Boundary Farming for a Sustainable Future. Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.Google Scholar