Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:18:47.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Struggling to Save Malaysia's Endau–Rompin Rain Forest,* 1972–92

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

S. Robert Aiken
S. Robert Aiken
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Boulevard West, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1M8, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The protracted dispute over the fate of the Endau-Rompin rain-forest in southern Peninsular Malaysia is outlined. Attention is focused on why a proposal to create an Endau-Rompin national park was eventually abandoned, on what has been done of late to protect the wilderness region, and on what has been learned from the dispute. The main points are as follows:

1. Endau-Rompin is one of the last-remaining extensive tracts of largely undisturbed rain-forest in southern Peninsular Malaysia.

2. The Third Malaysia Plan 1976–1980 incorporated an earlier proposal to create a national park in the Endau-Rompin region.

3. A controversy erupted in 1977 when the state govern ment of Pahang approved a logging concession in the core area of the proposed park.

4. Logging ceased in 1978, but in spite of the preparation of a preliminary management plan and the passage of the National Parks Act (both in 1980), a national park was not created.

5. The 1985–6 ‘Malaysian Heritage and Scientific Expedition’ to Endau—Rompin focused a great deal of public attention on the wilderness region, but still a national park was not created.

6. In mid-1987 it was announced that there would be two adjoining state parks, not a national park, in the Endau-Rompin region.

7. The proposal to create a national park came to nothing because Pahang and Johor were unwilling to surrender their jurisdiction over their respective components of the required land to the Federal Government, and because the latter made no attempt to acquire the land in the national interest.

8. A state park has been established in the Johor part of the wilderness region, but the promised adjoining state park in Pahang has yet to be established. It would appear that the two parts of the protected area will be managed separately, with eco-tourism as an important focus.

9. For more than fifteen years the Malayan Nature Society has played a key role in the struggle to save the wilderness region.

10. The Endau-Rompin dispute revealed that NGOs such as the Malayan Nature Society can play a key role in the environmental arena, that ever-increasing competition for scarce natural resources makes it increasingly unlikely that new protected areas will be established, and that the protection and management of Malaysia's natural heritage is greatly confounded by the constitutional division of powers between the Federal and state governments.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , Summer 1993 , pp. 157 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, S. R. & Leigh, C. H. (1983). Ending the threat to Taman Negara: a Malaysian Gordon-Franklin won. Habitat, 11, pp. 11–4.Google Scholar
Aiken, S. R. & Leigh, C. H. (1984). A second national park for Peninsular Malaysia? The Endau—Rompin controversy. Biological Conservation, 29, pp. 253–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, S. R. & Leigh, C. H. (1985). On the declining fauna of Peninsular Malaysia in the post-colonial period. Ambio, 14, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
Aiken, S. R. & Leigh, C. H. (1986 a). Land use conflicts and rain forest conservation in Malaysia and Australia: The Endau—Rompin and Gordon-Franklin controversies. Land Use Policy, 3, pp. 161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, S. R. & Leigh, C. H. (1986 b). Hydro-electric power and wilderness protection. Impact of Science on Society, Nr 141, pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Aiken, S. R. & Leigh, C. H. (1992). Vanishing Rain Forests: The Ecological Transition in Malaysia. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, UK: xvii +194 pp., maps, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1976). Malaysia: face of green? Asiaweek, 7 04, p. 48.Google Scholar
Anon. (1987). Endau Rompin. The Planter, 63, p. 1.Google Scholar
Barlow, H. S. (1985). The Malayan Nature Society/Star Endau—Rompin Expedition. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 58, pp. 135–42.Google Scholar
Barraclough, S. (1984). Political participation and its regulation in Malaysia: opposition to the Societies (Amendment) Act 1981. Pacific Affairs, 57, pp. 450–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, N.M., Sayer, J.A. & Whitmore, T.C. (Eds) (1991). The Conservation Atlas of Tropical Forests: Asia and the Pacific. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, USA: 256 pp., maps, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, R. W. (1980). Endau—Rompin National Park Management Plan (preliminary draft). Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: vii + 89 pp., maps.Google Scholar
Flynn, R. W. & Tajuddin Abdullah, Mohd (1984). Distribution and status of the Sumatran rhinoceros in Peninsular Malaysia. Biological Conservation, 28, pp. 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, J. I. (1978). Endau-Rompin national park (a scientific case). Pp. 33–6 in Malaysian Scientific Association Annual Report 1976–77, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Kiew, B. H. (1986 a). Progress report on Endau—Rompin Expedition for the period June–November 1985. Malayan Naturalist (05), pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
Kiew, B. H. (1986 b). Assessment of the Endau-Rompin Expedition. Malayan Naturalist (11), pp. 5–9.Google Scholar
Kiew, B. H. (1987). The Malaysian Heritage and Scientific Expedition — Endau—Rompin: A Third World experience. Wallaceana, Nr 47, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
Kiew, B. H., Davison, G. W. H. & Kiew, R. (1987). The Malaysian Heritage and Scientific Expedition: Endau—Rompin, 1985–1986. Malayan Nature Journal, 41, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
Kiew, R. (Ed.) (1991). The State of Nature Conservation in Malaysia. Malayan Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 238 pp., maps, illustr.Google Scholar
Kumar, R. (1986). The Forest Resources of Malaysia: Their Economics and Development. Oxford University Press, Singapore: xvi + 268 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lent, J. A. (1984). Human rights in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 14, pp. 442–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaysia (1976). Third Malaysia Plan 1976–1980. Government Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: xx + 430 pp.Google Scholar
Malaysia (1980). Laws of Malaysia: Act 226, National Parks Act 1980. Government Printer, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 11 pp.Google Scholar
Milne, R. S. & Mauzy, D. K. (1986). Malaysia: Tradition, Modernity and Islam. Westview Press, Boulder & London: xix + 201 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Mohamed Suffian bin Hashim (1976). An Introduction to the Constitution of Malaysia. Government Printer, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: xxxvi + 412 pp.Google Scholar
New Straits Times (Kuala Lumpur) (1987) 11 and 22 06, 17 and 18 07; (1990) 14 06.Google Scholar
Ng, F. S. P. & Low, C. M. (1982). Check List of Endemic Trees of the Malay Peninsula. Forest Research Institute, Research Pamphlet Nr 88, Kepong, Malaysia: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Rachagan, S. S. (1983). Malaysia abandons Tembeling. International Water Power and Dam Construction, 35, pp. 43–7.Google Scholar
Rachagan, S. S. & Shamsul, Bahrin (1983). Development without destruction: The need for a pragmatic forest policy in Malaysia. The Planter, 59, pp. 491–506.Google Scholar
Rahman-Ali, A. (1968). Forest conservation in Malaya. Pp. 115–24 in Conservation in Tropical South East Asia (Eds Talbot, L. M. & Talbot, M. H.). IUCN New Series, Nr 10. IUCN, Merges, Switzerland: 550 pp.Google Scholar
Rubeli, K. (1986 a). Endau—Rompin: A refuge for Malaysia's rainforest. Habitat, 14, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
Rubeli, K. (1986 b). Taman Negara park ‘progress’: wise and otherwise. Habitat, 14, p. 23.Google Scholar
Seaward, N. (1987). The core of the matter. Far Eastern Economic Review (13 08), p. 79.Google Scholar
Shafruddin, B. H. (1987). The Federal Factor in the Government and Politics of Peninsular Malaysia. Oxford University Press, Singapore: 428 pp. illustr.Google Scholar
Sharp, I. (1987). Will Endau—Rompin ever be a national park? Malayan Naturalist (03), pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
Sharp, T. (1983). Malaysia's environment in danger. Ambio, 12, pp. 275–6.Google Scholar
Singh, G. (1985). A slow stirring of environmental concern. Far Eastern Economic Review (19 12), pp. 30–1.Google Scholar
Stevens, W. E. (1968). The Conservation of Wildlife in West Malaysia. Office of the Chief Game Warden, Federal Game Department, Ministry of Lands and Mines, Seremban, Malaysia: 116 pp.Google Scholar
Suhaini, Aznam (1987 a). The unofficial thorns. Far Eastern Economic Review (1 01) pp. 16–7.Google Scholar
Suhaini, Aznam (1987 b). Alternative societies. Far Eastern Economic Review (15 10), pp. 33–4, 36.Google Scholar
Tho, Y. P. & Lim, R. (1985). Unveiling the natural treasures of Endau—Rompin. Pp. 29–37 in The New Straits Times Annual '86, Berita Publishing, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Wain, B. (1978). Fight over a forest. Asian Wall Street Journal (22 02), pp. 1 & 7.Google Scholar
Woon, W. C. & Lim, H. F. (1990). The non-government organizations and government policy on environmental issues in Malaysia. Wallaceana, Nrs 59 & 60, pp. 10–15.Google Scholar