Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:57:48.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sewage Treatment for Small Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Henry T. Mann
Affiliation:
Water Research Centre, Stevenage Laboratory, Elder Way, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, England.

Extract

Many small communities use septic tanks as a method of partial sewage treatment in situations where effluents may be satisfactorily discharged into the soil. These systems are also suitable for use in many situations where intermittent occupation occurs. Where effluents are discharged into streams in which serious pollution is likely, further treatment by secondary processes is necessary, and in many situations tertiary treatment processes are added as a final safeguard. Prefabricated or package-plant systems using variants of the activated-sludge process or special types of percolating filter, have become available and can be designed by the manufacturers to satisfy all of the purposes of primary and secondary treatment in specific situations. Maintenance requirements of most of these processes are small, but no system may be operated for long periods without a minimum of maintenance.

Some of the simplest systems of sewage treatment can provide excellent sanitary conditions and a high level of protection from health hazards and environmental deterioration if properly designed and operated. Package plants are compact and convenient but not necessarily more effective. They are usually dependent on a reliable power-supply, but have many advantages on restricted sites or sites requiring rapid development or expansion.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arceivala, S. J., Lakshminarayana, J. S. S., Ala-Garsamy, S. R. & Sastry, C. A. (1970). Waste Stabilization Ponds: Design, Construction and in India. Central Public Health Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, India: xxi + 100 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Banks, D. H. (1964). Upward-flow clarifier for use in treating sewage effluents. Surveyor (London), 123(3745), pp. 21–3.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1972). Small Sewage Treatment Works. British Standard Code of Practice CP 302: 1972, 43 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bruce, A. M., Brown, B. L. & Mann, H. T. (1973). Some developments in the treatment of sewage from small communities. Publ. Hlth Engr, 1973, pp. 116–37.Google Scholar
Hartmann, H. (1960). Entwicklung und Betrieb von Tauchtropfkörperanlagen. Gas.-u WassFach, 101, pp. 281 et seq.Google Scholar
Ministry of Housing and Local Government (1969). Technical Memorandum on Activated-sludge Sewage-treatment Installations Providing for a Long Period of Aeration. H. M. Stationery Office, London: 8 pp.Google Scholar
Ministry of Technology (1971). Water Pollution Research 1970. H. M. Stationery Office, London: vii + 185 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pasveer, A. (1959). A contribution to the development in activated-sludge treatment. J. Inst. Sew. Purif., 4, pp. 456–65.Google Scholar
Pöpel, F. (1964). Aufbau, Abbauleistung und Bemessung von Tauchtropfkörpers. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol., 26, pp. 394 et seq.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. G. & Lanoix, J. N. (1959). Water supply for rural areas and small communities. WHO Monograph No. 42, 337 pp., illustr.Google Scholar