Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:46:40.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potentials and Problems of Hill Areas in Relation to Conservation of Wildlife in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

G. M. Oza
G. M. Oza
Affiliation:
Founding Editor of Environmental Awareness and General Secretary of the Indian Society of Naturalists, Oza Building, Salatwada, Baroda 390001, India; Lecturer in Biological Sciences, General Education Centre, M.S. University of Baroda, Baroda 390002, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Basically through population pressures leading to habitat encroachment and commercial slaughter, India is becoming poorer, day be day, in her still-rich heritage of wildlife. Virgin forests on the plains and in the hilly regions are dwindling. Unfortunately, education and research centres have not cared to educate the youth of the country about the importance of nature conservation.

The Author's field endeavours, extending over more than a decade, have helped to reveal that 18 of India's 27 threatened mammalian species—lion-tailed Macaque, Macaque, Nilgiri Langur, Golden Langur, Snub-nosed Langur, Wolf, Asiatic Wild Dog, Malabar Large-spotted Civet, Clouded Leopard, Indian Tiger, Leopard, Snow Leopard, Asian Elephant, Sumatran Rhinoceros, Kashmir Stag, Gaur, Wild Yak, Nilgiri Tahr, and Markhor—have their homes in hilly or montane habitats. Pradoxically, India has the dubious distinction of ranking second in the world, and first among the 15 countries of the Oriental region, in having 27 mammalian species whose world populations are to some extent threatened according to the Red Data Book (IUCN, 1972).

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1980 , pp. 193 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dang, H. (1967). The Snow Leopard and its prey. Cheetal, 10, pp. 72–84.Google Scholar
Daniel, J. C. (1971). The Nilgiri Tahr (Hemitragus hylocrius) (Ogilby) in the High Range, Kerala, and the Southern Hills of the Western Ghats. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 67, pp. 535–42.Google Scholar
Davidar, E. R. C. (1963). Census of the Nilgiri Tahr, Hemitragus hylocrius (Ogilby), in the Nilgiris. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 60, pp. 251–2.Google Scholar
Gee, E. P. (1964). The Wildlife of India. Collins, London, U.K.: 224 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gee, E. P. (1966). Report on the status of the Kashmir Stag, October 1965. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 62, pp. 379–93, illustr.Google Scholar
Gee, E. P. (1967). Occurrence of the Snow Leopard, Panthera uncia (Schreber), in Bhutan. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 64, pp. 552–3.Google Scholar
Holloway, C. W. (1970 a). The Hangul in Dachigam: a census. Oryx, 10, pp. 373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, C. W. (1970 b). Management of the Gamgul Siya-Behi Sanctuary. IUCN, Morges, Switzerland: 8 pp., mimeogr.Google Scholar
Holloway, C. W., Schaller, G. B. & Wani, A. R. (1971). Dachigam Wildlife Sanctuary, Kashmir, with special reference to the status and management of the Hangul (Cervus elaphus hanglu).Proc. IUCN 11th Technical Meeting, IUCN Publ, New Series 19, pp. 109–12.Google Scholar
Hussain, M. Khader (1969). The Southern Asiatic Gaur or Indian Bison (Bos gaurus gaurus H. Smith). Cheetal, 12, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
IUCN. (1966). Survival Service Commission Red Data Book on the Endangered Mammals. IUCN, Morges, Switzerland: loose-leaf.Google Scholar
IUCN. (1972). Survival Service Commission Red Data Book on the Endangered Mammals. IUCN, Morges, Switzerland: loose-leaf.Google Scholar
Kuper, J. (1978). [Editorial note.] Tigerpaper, 5(3), p. 33.Google Scholar
Mountford, Guy (1974). International efforts to save the Tiger from extinction. Biol. Conserv., 6, pp. 48–52, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oza, G. M. (1973). Vanishing Indian wildlife. Nagarjun, 16, p. 8.Google Scholar
Oza, G. M. (1977). Habitat and food of the Kahsmir Deer or Hangul. Environmental Conservation, 4(2), pp. 149–50, figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oza, G. M. (1978). Indian wildlife and human civilization. Indian Journ. Forestry, 1, pp. 25–30, 4 figs.Google Scholar
Oza, G. M. (1980). Threat to the Chir and Fir forests of Kashmir. Environmental Conservation, 7(1), pp. 31–2, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, G. B. (1969). Observations on the Hangul or Kashmir Stag (Cervus elaphus hanglu Wagner). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 66, pp. 1–7, illustr.Google Scholar
Schaller, G. B. (1971). Observations on the Nilgiri Tahr (Hemitragus hylocrius) (Ogilby, 1838). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 67, pp. 365–89.Google Scholar
Sharma, Indra Kumar (1978). Occurrence and Survival of the Wolf in the Indian Desert. Tigerpaper, 5(3), pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
Singh, V. B. (1969). The Elephant (Elephas maximus Linnaeus) in Uttar Pradesh, India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 66, pp. 239–50.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. (1968). The ecology of the Lion-tailed Macaque. J. Bombay. Nat. Hist. Soc., 65, pp. 283–92.Google Scholar