Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:00:17.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant Life and Desertification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Frits W. Went  and
V. Ramesh Babu
Frits W. Went
Affiliation:
Desert Research Institute, University of Nevada System, Reno, Nevada 89506, U.S.A.
V. Ramesh Babu
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, S.S. College, Alipur, Delhi 110036, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are numerous instances where, through injudicious use, Man has contributed to desertification of the agricultural environment by increasing the aridity and decreasing the ability of the soil to support vegetation. This may come through erosion, even in areas with very high rainfall (e.g. Amazonia). But in many arid regions dedesertification has occurred under the influence of Man (e.g. Imperial Valley in California, Hungry Desert in Uzbekistan, 90-Miles Desert in Australia).

However, under certain conditions, such as those of fog-drip, an irreversible desertification can be caused by removal of the original vegetation (e.g. Central Chile).

Dew may be an important source of water for plants even in deserts, where there is a shortage cf liquid water for plant growth.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , Winter 1978 , pp. 263 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beard, J. S. (1976). The evolution of Australian desert plants. Pp. 51–64 in Evolution of Desert Biota (Ed. Goodall, D. W.). University of Texas Press, Austin & London: [not available for checking].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bharucha, F. R. (1955). The structural and physiological features of the Rajasthan Desert. Pp. 37–40 in Plant Ecology. Unesco: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. (1975). Desert expansion and the adaptive problems of the inhabitants. Pp. 255–68 in Environmental Physiology of Desert Organisms (Ed. Hadley, N. F.). Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: viii + 283 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Duvdevani, S. (1953). Dew gradients in relation to climate, soil and topography. Pp. 136–52 in Publications of the Research Council of Israel. Int. Symp. held in Jerusalem [not available for checking].Google Scholar
El-Baz, F. (1977). Desertification, a world-wide problem, creates grim bsauty but threatens crucial crop lands. Smithsonian, 8, pp. 34–41.Google Scholar
Ferri, M.G. (1974). Ecologia, temas e problemas brasilieros. Universidade de Sao Paulo: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Gindel, I. (1973). A New Ecophysiological Approach to Forest- Water Relationships in Arid Climates. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands: 142 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, D. W. (1976). Introduction. Pp. 3–6 in Evolution of Desert Biota (Ed. Goodall, D. W.). University of Texas Press, Austin & London: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Hare, F. Kenneth (1977). Connections between climate and desertification. Environmental Conservation, 4(2), pp. 81–90, 5 figsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieth, H. (1975). Primary productivity of the major vegetation units of the world. Pp. 203–16 in Primary Productivity of the Biosphere (Ed. Lieth, H. & Whittaker, R. H.). Springer-Verlag, New York–Heidelberg–Berlin: [not available for checking].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabbutt, Jack A. (1978). The impact of desertification as revealed by mapping. Environmental Conservation, 5(1), pp. 45–56, 4 maps.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcginnies, W. G. (1955). Characteristics and distribution of arid zone vegetation as related to land management in the United States. Pp. 25–28 in Plant Ecology. (Proc. of the Montpellier Symp). Unesco [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Mcginnies, W. G. (1968). Appraisal of research on vegetation of desert environments. Pp. 381–474 in Deserts of the World Ed. McGinnies, W. G., Goldman, B. J. & Paylore, P.). University of Arizona Press: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (1960). Introduction to Plant Geography and Some Related Sciences. Longmans, London, England, and McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.: xix + 640 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prospero, J. M. & Nees, R. T. (1977). Dust concentration in the atmosphere of the Equatorial North Atlantic: Possible relationship to the Sahelian drought. Science, 196, 1, 196–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranzani, G. (1963). Solos do Cerrado: Simposio sobre o Cerrado. Univ. de São Paulo: 51–92 [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Specht, R. L. (1957). Dark Island Heath (Ninety-mile plain, South Australia), IV. Soil moisture patterns produced by rainfall interception and stem flow. Austr. J. Bot., 5, pp. 137–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, E. C. (1957). Dew as an ecological factor, II. The effect of artificial dew on the survival of Pinus ponderosa and associated species. Ecology, 38, pp. 414–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudzuki, F. H. (1969). Absorción foliar de humedad atmospherica en Tamarugo, Proposis tamarugo. Phil. Univ. Chile, Faculdad de Agronomia Bol. Tech. No. 30 [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Wade, N. (1974). Sahelian drought: no victory for Western aid. Science, 185, pp. 234–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Went, F. W. (1956). Fog, mist, dew, and other sources of water. Pp. 103–9 in Yearbook of Agriculture 1956. U.S. Department of Agriculture [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Went, F. W. (1966). On the nature of Aitken condensation nuclei. Tellus, 18, pp. 549–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Went, F. W. (1975). Water vapour absorption in Prosopis. Pp. 67–75 in Physiological Adaptation to the Environment (Ed. Vernberg, F. J.). Intext Educational Publishers, New York, N.Y. [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Went, F. W. & Stark, N. (1968). Mycorrhiza. BioScience, 18, pp. 1,035–9.Google Scholar