Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:59:16.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Our Global Environment and the World Campaign for the Biosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Nicholas Polunin
Nicholas Polunin
Affiliation:
President of the Foundation for Environmental Conservation; Secretary-General and Editor of the International Conferences on Environmental Future; Founder and Editor of Environmental Conservation; Convener and General Editor of Environmental Monographs and Symposia, 15 Chemin F.-Lehmann, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After a requested account of how, starting from his student days, he had come gradually to ‘care about our Only One Biosphere’ and think globally (even if commonly acting only locally), the Author presents his ‘thoughts on what might best be done to [foster a World Campaign for the Biosphere] and make it operationally effective’. This Campaign should be world-wide and have the objective of educating everybody everywhere to full realization of the following facts and their often imperatively grave implications: (1) The Biosphere constitutes a single integrated whole of which all parts are often intricately interdependent, (2) we humans form an integral part of the Biosphere but are becoming far too numerous and heavily dominant for its or our own good, (3) we are absolutely dependent on the health of the Biosphere for our own subsistence and more as it constitutes our sole life-support, (4) The Biosphere in part or even in toto is in several ways fragile, but (5) it is gravely threatened by various human activities and out-sized capabilities such as those of nuclear weaponry which are said to be sufficient to destroy our civilization several times over, and conceivably even the entire Biosphere.

The second, longer part of the article is devoted to consideration of the following chosen ‘round dozen’ recommended activities through which it is thought the Campaign might best be advanced, at least in its early stages: (1) Publishing and broadcasting pertinent information and support by all appropriate means; (2) Using other vehicles of desirable publicity, including posters and stickers; (3) Instructive advertising and audienceattracting showmanship; (4) Books on the Biosphere and illustrated study manuals; (5) Specialist research and its vigorous application; (6) Need to control human numbers and behaviour; (7) National Parks, Biosphere Reserves, and Biological Gardens, etc.; (8) Pertinent conferences, meetings, and other ‘free’ deliberations; (9) Need to change human attitudes and priorities; (10) Need to establish due ethics and laws; (11) Institutional and organizational involvement towards survival; and (12) ‘Guardians of the Biosphere’ recognition and awards.

The above 12 points largely follow those presaged in the Editorial in our preceding issue, since completion of which it has emerged that this Campaign should be socalled (without reference to any time-scale), and that it might best be furthered by two United Nations agencies, an intergovernmental one, and at least one nongovernmental one—all hopefully working in concert.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Summer 1982 , pp. 115 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batisse, Michel (1980). The relevance of MAB. Environmental Conservation, 7(3), pp. 179–84, map.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batisse, Michel (1982). The Biosphere Reserve: A tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 101–11, 8 figs.Google Scholar
Cloud, Preston (1980). An International Year of the Biosphere? Environmental Conservation, 7(2), p. 92.Google Scholar
Eidsvik, Harold K. (1980). National Parks and protected areas: Some reflections on the past and prescriptions for the future. Environmental Conservation, 7(3), pp. 185–90.Google Scholar
Gaekwad, Fatesinghrao P. & Oza, G. M. (1981). Save our Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 8(2), pp. 117–8, fig.Google Scholar
Gregory, Philip H. (1973). The Microbiology of the Atmosphere, 2nd edn. (A Plant Science Monograph: General Editor, Nicholas, Polunin.) Leonard Hill, London, England, UK: xxi + 377 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Guppy, Nicholas (1980). Some crucial issues of our time. Environmental Conservation, 7(1), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Hiatt, Howard H. (1981). Foreseeable medical consequences of use of nuclear weapons. Environmental Conservation, 8(4), pp. 263–7.Google Scholar
Johnson, Stanley P. (1980). The pandominance of Man. Pp. 173–94 and following discussion to p. 207 in Polunin (1980 d, q.v.).Google Scholar
Laconte, Piene & Jones, Philip H. (1980). The World Environment and Resources Council (WERC). Environmental Conservation, 7(2), pp. 91–2.Google Scholar
Laconte, Pierre, Jones, Philip H. & Hughes-Evans, David (1980). Open Letter: Support for The World Decade of the Biosphere, 1982–92. Environmental Conservation, 7(4), pp. 257–8.Google Scholar
Meier, Fred C. & Lindbergh, Charles A. (1935). Collecting microorganisms from the arctic atmosphere… ‘with field notes and material’ by Charles A. Lindbergh. Scientific Monthly, 40, pp. 5–20.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (1951 a). Seeking airborne botanical particles about the North Poles. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, 45(2), pp. 320–54, illustr.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (1951 b). Arctic aerobiology: Pollen grains and other spores observed on sticky slides exposed in 1947. Nature (London), 168, pp. 718–21, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (1955). Arctic aeropalynology: Spores observed on sticky slides exposed in various regions in 1950. Canadian Journal of Botany, 33, pp. 401–15.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (1972). The biosphere today. Pp. 33–52 and following discussion etc. to page 64 in The Environmental Future (Ed. Polunin, Nicholas), The Macmillan Press, London & Basingstoke, England, UK, and Barnes & Noble, New York, NY: xiv + 660 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas [as N.P.] (1980 a). Editorial: Environmental education and the Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 7(2), pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas [as N.P.] (1980 b). Editorial: The forthcoming World Decade of the Biosphere, 1982–92. Environmental Conservation, 7(4), p. 257.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (1980 c). Suggested actions for the forthcoming ‘World Decade of the Biosphere’. Environmental Conservation, 7(4), pp. 271–7, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (Ed.) (1980 d). Growth Without Ecodisasters? Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Environmental Future (2nd ICEF), held in Reykjavik, Iceland, 5–11 June 1977. Macmillan, London & Basingstoke, England, UK, and Halsted Press Division of John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA: xxvi + 675 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas [as N.P.] (1982). Human aspirations, environmental care, and the much-needed World Decade of the Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 9(1), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas & Kelly, C. D. (1952). Arctic aerobiology: Fungi and Bacteria, etc., caught in the air during flights over the geographical North Pole. Nature (London), 170, pp. 314–6.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas, Pady, S. M. & Kelly, C. D. (1947). Arctic aerobiology. Nature (London), 160, pp. 867–7, map.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas, Pady, S. M. & Kelly, C. D. (1948). Aerobiological investigations in the Arctic and Subarctic. Arctic (Journal of the Arctic Institute of North America), 1(1), pp. 60–1.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, John R. (1980). Early reactions to the concept of ‘The International Year of the Biosphere’. Environmental Conservation, 7(2), pp. 97–9.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, John R. (1981). Origin of the proposal for the World Decade of the Biosphere, 1982–1992. The Environmentalist, 1(3), pp. 244–6.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, John R. (MS.). I am a ‘Save Our Biosphere’ Sticker Distributor. Typescript submitted from Burlington, Ontario, Canada: 3 pp. [Published in updated form on page 111 of this issues.—Ed.]Google Scholar
Vallentyne, John R., Strickler, J. R. & Polunin, Nicholas (1980 a). Battle for the Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 7(2), pp. 90–1.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, John R., Strickler, J. R. & Polunin, Nicholas (1980 b). Proposal: International Year of the Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 7(1), p. 2.Google Scholar
Westing, Arthur H. (1981). Environmental impact of nuclear war. Environmental Conservation, 8(4), pp. 269–73.Google Scholar
Widman, Gary L. & Schram, Gunnar G. (1980). Common laws for Earth and Mankind: A glorious hope? Pp. 515–68 and following discussion to page 579 in Polunin (1980 d, q.v.).Google Scholar
Willard, Beatrice, E., Asibey, , Emmanuel, O. A., Holdgate, , Martin, W., Fukushima, , Yoichi, & Gray, , Elizabeth, & Dodson, David (1980). Ethics of biosphere survival: A dialogue. Pp. 505–35 and following discussion to page 551 in Polunin (1980 d, q.v.).Google Scholar
Worthington, E. Barton (1982). World Campaign for the Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 93–100.Google Scholar