Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:56:03.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nature Reserves, National Parks, and Post-war Reconstruction, in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

John Sheail
John Sheail
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood Experimental Station, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE17 2LS, England, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An historical reconstruction of how key decisions were taken on Nature-conservation issues provides a context for appraising contemporary initiatives, both on a national and an international basis. This paper has been focused on one of the most important landmarks in the development of Nature conservation in Britain, namely the establishment of the Nature Conservancy in 1949. It recounts how the advocacy of pressure-groups, and the appointment of ad hoc inquiries, ensured that Nature conservation had a place in the Government's post-war reconstruction programme, and how it came to be regarded primarily as a scientific rather than a planning issue.

There was nothing inevitable about the steps that were taken in the 1940s. They owed much to the way in which key personalities perceived shifts in public opinion towards the role of central government, and exploited the opportunities thrown up by the national parks movement. Despite the projection of the Nature Conservancy as a body that was modest in status and resources, its potential proved to be enormous. It had the responsibility not only for acquiring and managing Nature reserves, and for disseminating advice on wildlife conservation generally, but also for carrying out the research which was and always will be relevant to those functions. It is, however, doubtful whether the personnel who were responsible for the main initiatives in the 1940s fully appreciated the implications of what they were striving to achieve.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1984 , pp. 29 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addison, P. (1977). The Road to 1945. Quartet Books, London, England, UK: 334 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Barker, P.A. (1979). Vegetation science and nature conservation. Pp. 247–88 in The Study of Vegetation (Ed. Werger, M.J.A.). Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands: xi + 316 pp. illustr.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. (1981). International Organization and the Conservation of Nature. Macmillan, London, England, UK: 215 pp.Google Scholar
British Ecological Society (1944). Nature conservation and nature reserves. Journal of Ecology, 32, pp. 45–82.Google Scholar
Cherry, G.E. (1975). Environmental Planning, Volume II: National Parks and Recreation in the Countryside. HMSO, London, England, UK: vii + 173 pp.Google Scholar
Conference on Nature Preservation in Post-war Reconstruction (1941). Memorandum No. 1, 8 pp. (1942). [Conference on Nature Preservation in Post-war Reconstruction] Memorandum No. 2, 4 pp. (1943a). [Conference on Nature Preservation in Post-war Reconstruction] Memorandum No. 3, 25 pp. (1943b). [Conference on Nature Preservation in Post-war Reconstruction] Memorandum No. 4, 11 pp. (1945a). [Conference on Nature Preservation in Post-war Reconstruction] Memorandum No. 5, 41 pp. (1945b). [Conference on Nature Preservation in Post-war Reconstruction] Memorandum No. 6, 77 pp. [All published by the] Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves, London, England, UK.Google Scholar
Cullingworth, J.B. (1975). Environmental Planning, Volume I: Reconstruction and Land Use Planning, 1939–1947. HMSO, London, England, UK: xv + 283 pp.Google Scholar
Dalyell, T. (1981). Wildlife and political muscle. New Scientist, 91 (1263), p. 243.Google Scholar
Donoughue, B. & Jones, G.W. (1973). Herbert Morrison, Portrait of a Politician. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London, England, UK: xvi + 696 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dower, J. (1945). National Parks in Englandand Wales. HMSO, London, England, UK: Cmd 6628, 57 pp.Google Scholar
Edelsten, H. McD. (1950–1951). John Claud Fortescue Fryer, 1886–1948. Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society. University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: Vol. 7, pp. 95–106, illustr.Google Scholar
Huxley, J.S. (1947). Conservation of Nature in England and Wales. HMSO, London, England, UK: Cmd 7122, 139 pp.Google Scholar
Lowe, P.D. (1983). Values and institutions in the history of British Nature Conservation. Pp. 329–52 in Conservation in Perspective (Ed. Warren, A. & Goldsmith, F.B.). Wiley, Chichester, England, UK: 474 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
MacEwen, A. & MacEwen, M. (1982). National Parks: Conservation or Cosmetics? Allen & Unwin, London, England, UK: xxii + 314 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
MelChett, P. (1981). Bill made Act? Ecos, 2(4), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Morrison, H. (1954). Government and Parliament: A Survey from the Inside. Oxford University Press, London, England, UK: xiii + 363 pp.Google Scholar
National Parks Committee (1947). Report. HMSO, London, England, UK: Cmd. 7121, 134 pp.Google Scholar
Nicholson, [E.] M. (1970). The Environmental Revolution. Hodder & Stoughton, London, England, UK: 366 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Nicholson, [E.] M. (1973). Foreword. Pp. v–ix in Conservation in Practice (Ed. Warren, A. & Goldsmith, F.B.). Wiley, London, England, UK: xv + 512 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pearsall, W.H. (1964). The development of ecology in Britain. Journal of Ecology, 52 Supplement, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Pinder, J. (Ed.) (1981). Fifty Years of Political and Economic Planning. Heinemann, London, England, UK: xii + 228 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
PRO—see Public Record Office (with number of citation).Google Scholar
Public Record Office (PRO) 1: HLG 92, 18; 2: HLG 92, 49; 3: CAB 87, 10; 4: HLG 93, 48; 5: CAB 132,9 & 10; 6: CAB 124, 444; 7: CAB 132, 10; 8: CAB 132, 9 & 12; 9: CAB 132, 10; 10: CAB 124, 1134.Google Scholar
Scottish Record Office (SRO) 1: DD 12, 875.Google Scholar
SRO—see Scottish Record Office.Google Scholar
Sheail, J. (1975). The concept of national parks in Great Britain, 1900–1950. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 66, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
Sheail, J. (1976). Nature in Trust: The History of Nature Conservation in Britain. Blackie, Glasgow, Scotland, UK: xiv + 270 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Sheail, J. (1981 a). Rural Conservation in Inter-war Britain. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, UK: xiv + 263 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Sheail, J. (1981 b). Sir Graham Vincent: An Appreciation. Planning History Bulletin, 3(3), pp. 14–7.Google Scholar
Sheail, J. (1982). Wild plants and the perception of land-use change in Britain: an historical perspective. Biological Conservation, 24, pp. 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheail, J. & Wells, T.C.E. (1983). The Fenlands of Huntingdonshire, England: a case study in catastrophic change. Pp. 375–93 in Mires, Swamp, Bog, Fen and Moor, B: Regional Studies (Ed. Gore, A.J.P.). Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, Netherlands: xii + 479 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Tansley, A.G. (1945). Our Heritage of Wild Nature: A Plea for Organised Nature Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: 74 pp.Google Scholar
Worthington, E.B. (1982). The ecological century. Environmental Conservation, 9(1), pp. 65–70.Google Scholar