Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:12:59.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The MINK Project: A New Methodology for Identifying Regional Influences of, and Responses to, Increasing Atmospheric CO2 and Climate Change*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Norman J. Rosenberg  and
Pierre R. Crosson
Pierre R. Crosson
Affiliation:
Respectively Director & Senior Fellow, Climate Resources Program, Energy & Natural Resources Division, Resources for the Future, 1616 P Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a study that was recently completed at Resources for the Future, the impacts of a future change in climate on the total economy of the Missouri–Iowa–Nebraska–Kansas (MINK) region were assessed, as were the possibilities of response (including adaptation) to the climatic change. Impacts on agriculture, forestry, water resources, and energy, were emphasized. The study was future-oriented, focusing on the year 2030, by which time the effects of ‘greenhouse’ warming may be felt. The records of the AD 1930s were used to provide an analog of the kinds of climate change (warmer and drier) that climate models predict will occur in the MINK region.

Our results indicate that impacts of the projected climate change on agriculture, at least in the future, are expected to be profound, but that likely-to-be available technologies should facilitate substantial adaptation; that current water-resource limitations in the region would be exacerbated and lead to an eastward shift in irrigation; that impacts on forestry would be severe, and that opportunities for forestry adaptation would be very limited unless biomass production were to become economically viable; and that the net impacts on energy supply and demand would be small and adaptation to them relatively simple.

Climate change in the MINK region could, of course, go somewhat beyond the conditions represented by the AD 1930s analog, in which case the findings of this study may be too optimistic. However, the future-oriented ‘MINK methodology’ is not scenario-dependent, and can be used to test other, more severe (or benign), scenarios as well. Further, the capacity for adaptation to climate change demonstrated in this study, may remain applicable even in more stringent circumstances.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , Winter 1991 , pp. 313 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alward, G.S. (1986). IMPLAN Version 2.0: Methods Used to Construct the 1982 Regional Economic Data Base. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-000 (draft), Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA: 59 pp., tables, diagrams + appendices not paginated.Google Scholar
Alward, G.S. (1988). Micro IMPLAN: Methods for Constructing Regional Economic Accounts. A paper presented at the Conference on Input—Output Modeling and Economic Development Application, 02 28–03 2, 1989, Kansas City, Missouri, USA: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Crosson, P.R. (1989). The Long-term Adequacy of Agricultural Land in the United States: Economic and Environmental Issues. Unpublished manuscript, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA: c. 300 pp. (typescr.).Google Scholar
Gates, W.L. (1985). The use of general circulation models in the analysis of the ecosystem impacts of climate change. Climatic Change, 7, pp. 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (1990). The IPCC Scientific Assessment: Report Prepared for IPCC by Working Group I (Eds Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J. & Ephraums, J.J.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: xxxix + 365 pp., tables, maps, diagrams.Google Scholar
Manabe, S. & Wetherald, R.T. (1986). Reduction in summer soil wetness induced by an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 232, pp. 626–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavet, E.F., Cervera, J. Sancho y & Arias, D. P-G. (1978). Droughts in Mexico: Their History and Characteristics. Paper presented at the Conference Drought and Man, held in Mar del Plata, Argentina, 4–8 12 1978: 10 pp. (typescr.).Google Scholar
Parry, M.L., Carter, T.R. & Konijn, N.T. (Eds) (1988). The Impact of Climatic Variations on Agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Volume 1: Assessments in Cool Temperate and Cold Regions: xii + 876 pp., illustr., tables, maps, diagrams; Volume 2: Assessments in Semi-arid Regions: xii + 764 pp., illustr., tables.Google Scholar
Perlack, R.D. & Geyer, W.A. (1987). Wood energy plantation economics in the Great Plains. J. Energy Engineering, 113, pp. 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N.J., Kimball, B.A., Martin, P. & Cooper, C.F. (1990). From Climate and CO2 Enrichment to Evapotranspiration. Chapter 7, pp. 151–75 in Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources (Ed. Waggoner, P.E.). John Wiley, New York, NY, USA: xiii + 496 pp., illustr., tables.Google Scholar
Scott, M.J. & Yohe, G.W. (1990). Informal Conference Report: International Workshop on the Natural Resources and Economic Consequences of Global Climate Change. PNL-SA-19410, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA: 14 pp. (typescr.).Google Scholar
Smith, J.B. & Tirpak, D. (Eds) (1989). The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States: Appendix C-Agriculture. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, EPA-230-05-89-053: xxvi + 275 pp., tables, maps, diagrams.Google Scholar
Solomon, A.M. (1986). Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: Simulation modeling experiments in eastern North America. Oecologia, 68, pp. 567–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockle, C.O., Williams, J.R., Rosenberg, N.J. & Jones, C.A. (1992 a). Estimation of the effects of CO2-induced climate change on growth and yield of crops, I: Modification of the EPIC model for climate change analysis. Agricultural Systems [38 pp. in press].Google Scholar
Stockle, C.O., Dyke, P.T., Williams, J.R., Jones, C.A. & Rosenberg, N.J. (1992 b). Estimation of the effects of CO2-in-duced climate change on the growth and yield of crops, II: Assessing the impact on maize, wheat, and soybean in the midwestern USA. Agricultural Systems [38 pp. in press].Google Scholar
US Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis (1990). Regional Projections to 2040. Vol. 1: States. Washington, DC, USA: v + 126 pp., tables.Google Scholar
Williams, J.R., Jones, C.A. & Dyke, P.T. (1984). A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 27, pp. 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar