Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:21:37.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Landscape correlates of bushmeat consumption and hunting in a post-frontier Amazonian region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

PATRICIA CARIGNANO TORRES*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 101, Travessa 14, CEP 05508-090, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
CARLA MORSELLO
Affiliation:
Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Arlindo Béttio, 1000, CEP 03828-000, Ermelino Matarazzo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
LUKE PARRY
Affiliation:
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos (NAEA), Universidade Federal do Pará, Av. Perimetral, Numero 1 – Guamá, CEP 66075-750, Belém, PA, Brazil
JOS BARLOW
Affiliation:
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Av. Magalhães Barata, 376, CEP 66040-170, Belém, Brazil
JOICE FERREIRA
Affiliation:
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro s/n, CP 48, CEP 66095-100, Belém, PA, Brazil
TOBY GARDNER
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK
RENATA PARDINI
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 101, Travessa 14, CEP 05508-090, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
*
*Correspondence: Dr Patricia Carignano Torres email: [email protected]

Summary

Identifying the drivers of bushmeat consumption and hunting is important for informing conservation strategies and recognizing challenges to human food security. However, studies often neglect the importance of landscape context, which can influence bushmeat supply and demand. Here, by quantifying bushmeat consumption and hunting in 262 households in a post-frontier region in Amazonia, we tested the hypotheses that bushmeat consumption and hunting are positively associated with two landscape characteristics: (1) forest cover, which has been shown to define game availability; and (2) remoteness, which is related to limited access to marketed meat. Bushmeat consumption was widespread but more likely in remote forested areas. Hunting was more likely in more forested areas, especially nearer to urban centres. Our findings suggest that bushmeat remains an important food source even in heavily altered forest regions and that landscape context is an important determinant of bushmeat consumption and hunting. Although people living in remote, forested areas are likely to be the most dependent on bushmeat, those living in more populous, peri-urban areas are likely the actors contributing most to total hunting effort, due to a higher probability of hunting combined with higher human population densities. This finding undermines the assumption that rural–urban migration in the tropics will deliver a much-needed reprieve for many overhunted species.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

8

Current address: Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, Box 24218, Stockholm, 104 51, Sweden

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000510

References

REFERENCES

Andrén, H. (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: A review. Oikos 71: 355366.Google Scholar
Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N.J., Bauch, S., Borner, J., Smith-Hall, C. & Wunder, S. (2014) Environmental income and rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis. World Development 64: S12S28.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. (2011) Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42 [www document]. URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Behrens, C.A. (1992) Labor specialization and the formation of markets for food in a Shipibo subsistence economy. Human Ecology 20: 435462.Google Scholar
Brashares, J.S., Golden, C.D., Weinbaum, K.Z., Barret, C.B. & Okello, G.V. (2011) Economic and geographic drivers of wildlife consumption in rural Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 1393113936.Google Scholar
Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D. (2002) Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Chaves Baía Júnior, P., Guimarães, D.A. & Le Pendu, Y. (2010) Non-legalized commerce in game meat in the Brazilian Amazon: A case study. Revista Biología Tropical 58: 10791088.Google Scholar
Chiarello, A.G. (1999) Effects of fragmentation of the Atlantic forest on mammal communities in south-eastern Brazil. Biological Conservation 89: 7182.Google Scholar
de Merode, E., Homewood, K. & Cowlishaw, G. (2004) The value of bushmeat and other wild foods to rural households living in extreme poverty in Democratic Republic of Congo. Biological Conservation 118: 573581.Google Scholar
Espinosa, M.C. (2009) What has globalization to do with wildlife use in the remote Amazon? Exploring the links between macroeconomic changes, markets and community entitlements. Journal of Developing Societies 24: 489521.Google Scholar
Fa, J.E., Albrechtsen, L., Johnson, P.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (2009) Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea. Animal Conservation 12: 599610.Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 487515.Google Scholar
Fearnside, P.M. (2005) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, rates and consequences. Conservation Biology 19: 680688.Google Scholar
Foerster, S., Wilkie, D.S., Morelli, G.A., Demmer, J., Starkey, M., Telfer, P., Steil, M. & Lewbel, A. (2012) Correlates of bushmeat hunting among remote rural households in Gabon, Central Africa. Conservation Biology 26: 335344.Google Scholar
Gardner, T. et al. (2013) A social and ecological assessment of tropical land-uses at multiple scales: The Sustainable Amazon Network. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 368: 20120166.Google Scholar
Godoy, R., Undurraga, E.A., Wilkie, D., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W.R., NcDade, T., Tanner, S., Vadez, V. & TAPS Bolivia Study Team (2010) The effect of wealth and real income on wildlife consumption among native Amazonians in Bolivia: Estimates of annual trends with longitudinal household data (2002–2006). Animal Conservation 13: 265274.Google Scholar
Golden, C.D., Wrangham, R.W. & Brashares, J.S. (2013) Assessing the accuracy of interviewed recall for rare, highly seasonal events: The case of wildlife consumption in Madagascar. Animal Conservation 16: 597603.Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2016) Grade Estatística. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro [www document]. URL ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/recortes_para_fins_estatisticos/grade_estatistica/censo_2010Google Scholar
Jorge, M.L.S.P., Galetti, M., Ribeiro, M.C. & Ferraz, K.M.P.M.B. (2013) Mammal defaunation as surrogate of trophic cascades in a biodiversity hotspot. Biological Conservation 163: 4957.Google Scholar
Ling, S. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2006) Assessment of the sustainability of bushmeat hunting based on dynamic bioeconomic models. Conservation Biology 20: 12941299.Google Scholar
McNamara, J., Kusimi, J.M., Rowcliffe, J.M., Cowlishaw, G., Brenyah, A. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2015) Long-term spatio-temporal changes in a West African bushmeat trade system. Conservation Biology 29: 14461457.Google Scholar
Mgawe, P., Mulder, M.B., Caro, T., Martin, A. & Kiffner, C. (2012) Factors affecting bushmeat consumption in the Katavi-Rukwa ecosystem of Tanzania. Tropical Conservation Science 5: 446462.Google Scholar
Michalski, F. & Peres, C.A. (2007) Disturbance-mediated mammal persistence and abundance–area relationships in Amazonian forest fragments. Conservation Biology 21: 16261640.Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E.J., Bennet, E.L. & SCB 2002 Annual Meeting Wild Meat Group (2003) Wild meat: The bigger picture. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 351357.Google Scholar
Moraes, P.E. (2016). Multiple threats and a mosaic of habitat patches of varying quality: The persistence of large mammals across a post-frontier Amazonian region. MSc Dissertation. São Paulo, Brazil: Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Moran, E.F. (1993) Deforestation and land use in the Brazilian Amazon. Humam Ecology 21: 121.Google Scholar
Nasi, R., Taber, A. & van Vliet, N. (2011) Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins. International Forestry Review 13: 355368.Google Scholar
Nuno, A., Bunnefeld, N., Naiman, L.C. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2013) A novel approach to assessing the prevalence and drivers of illegal bushmeat hunting in the Serengeti. Conservation Biology 27: 13551365.Google Scholar
Nyahongo, J.W., Holmern, T., Kaltenborn, B.P. & Roskaft, E. (2009) Spatial and temporal variation in meat and fish consumption among people in the western Serengeti, Tanzania: The importance of migratory herbivores. Oryx 43: 258266.Google Scholar
Ochoa-Quintero, J.M., Gardner, T.A., Rosa, I., Ferraz, S.F.B. & Sutherland, W.J. (2015) Thresholds of species loss in Amazonian deforestation frontier landscapes. Conservation Biology 29: 440451.Google Scholar
Pangau-Adams, M., Noske, R. & Muehlenberg, M. (2012) Wildmeat or bushmeat? Subsistence hunting and commercial harvesting in Papua (West New Guinea), Indonesia. Human Ecology 40: 611621.Google Scholar
Parry, L., Barlow, J. & Peres, C.A. (2007) Large-vertebrate assemblages of primary and secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23: 653662.Google Scholar
Parry, L., Barlow, J. & Peres, C.A. (2009a) Hunting for sustainability in tropical secondary forests. Conservation Biology 23: 12701280.Google Scholar
Parry, L., Barlow, J. & Peres, C.A. (2009b) Allocation of hunting effort by Amazonian smallholders: Implications for conserving wildlife in mixed-use landscapes. Biological Conservation 142: 17771786.Google Scholar
Parry, L., Day, B., Amaral, S. & Peres, C.A. (2010a). Drivers of rural exodus from Amazonian headwaters. Population and Environment 32: 137176.Google Scholar
Parry, L., Peres, C.A., Day, B. & Amaral, S. (2010b) Rural–urban migration brings conservation threats and opportunities to Amazonian watersheds. Conservation Letters 3: 251259.Google Scholar
Parry, L. & Peres, C.A. (2015) Evaluating the use of local ecological knowledge to monitor hunted tropical-forest wildlife over large spatial scales. Ecology and Society 20: 15.Google Scholar
Peres, C.A. (2001) Synergistic effects of subsistence hunting and habitat fragmentation on Amazonian forest vertebrates. Conservation Biology 15: 1590–1505.Google Scholar
Peres, C.A. & Palacios, E. (2007) Basin-wide effects of game harvest on vertebrate population densities in Amazonian forests: Implications for animal-mediated seed dispersal. Biotropica 39: 304315.Google Scholar
Prist, P.R., Michalski, F. & Metzger, J.P. (2012) How deforestation pattern in the Amazon influences vertebrate richness and community composition. Landscape Ecology 27: 799812.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing [www document]. URL http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Redford, K.H. (1992) The empty forest. Bioscience 42: 412422.Google Scholar
Rentsch, D. & Damon, A. (2013) Prices, poaching, and protein alternatives: An analysis of bushmeat consumption around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Ecological Economics 91: 19.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A.S.L., Ewers, R.M., Parry, L., Souza, C. Jr, Veríssimo, A. & Balmford, A. (2009) Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science 324: 14351437.Google Scholar
Sampaio, R., Lima, A.P., Magnusson, W.E. & Peres, C.A. (2010) Long-term persistence of midsized to large-bodied mammals in Amazonian landscapes under varying contexts of forest cover. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 24212439.Google Scholar
Schulte-Herbrüggen, B., Cowlishaw, G., Homewood, K. & Rowcliffe, J.M. (2013) The importance of bushmeat in the livelihoods of West African cash-crop farmers living in a faunally-depleted landscape. PLoS One 8: e72807.Google Scholar
Stoian, D. (2005) Making the best of two worlds: Rural and peri-urban livelihood options sustained by nontimber forest products from the Bolivian Amazon. World Development 33: 14731490.Google Scholar
Stoner, K.E., Vulinec, K., Wright, S.J. & Peres, C.A. (2007) Hunting and plant community dynamics in tropical forests: A synthesis and future directions. Biotropica 39: 385392.Google Scholar
Torres, P.C. (2014) Bushmeat hunting and consumption in Eastern Amazonia: Drivers and effects on the perception of forest value. PhD Dissertation. São Paulo, Brazil: Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Urquiza-Haas, T., Peres, C.A. & Dolman, P.M. (2009) Regional scale effects of human density and forest disturbance on large-bodied vertebrates throughout the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Biological Conservation 142: 134148.Google Scholar
van Vliet, N., Quiceno-Mesa, M.P., Cruz-Antia, D., Aquino, L.J.N., Moreno, J. & Nasi, R. (2014) The uncovered volumes of bushmeat commercialized in the Amazonian trifrontier between Colombia, Peru & Brazil. Ethnobiology and Conservation 3: 7.Google Scholar
Wilkie, D.S. & Godoy, R.A. (2001) Income and price elasticities of bushmeat demand in lowland Amerindian societies. Conservation Biology 15: 761769.Google Scholar
Wilkie, D.S., Starkey, M., Abernethy, K., Effa, E.N., Telfer, P. & Godoy, R. (2005) Role of prices and wealth in consumer demand for bushmeat in Gabon, Central Africa. Conservation Biology 19: 268274.Google Scholar
Wilkie, D.S., Bennett, E.L., Peres, C.A. & Cunningham, A.A. (2011) The empty forest revisited. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1223: 120128.Google Scholar
Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Wlaker, N.J., Saveliev, A.A. & Smith, G.M. (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York, NY, USA: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Torres et al supplementary material 1

Appendix

Download Torres et al supplementary material 1(File)
File 23 KB
Supplementary material: File

Torres et al supplementary material 2

Supplementary Figure

Download Torres et al supplementary material 2(File)
File 211.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Torres et al supplementary material 3

Supplementary Figure

Download Torres et al supplementary material 3(File)
File 176 KB
Supplementary material: File

Torres et al supplementary material 4

Supplementary Table

Download Torres et al supplementary material 4(File)
File 14.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Torres et al supplementary material 5

Supplementary Table

Download Torres et al supplementary material 5(File)
File 17.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Torres et al supplementary material 6

Supplementary Table

Download Torres et al supplementary material 6(File)
File 13.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Torres et al supplementary material 7

Supplementary Table

Download Torres et al supplementary material 7(File)
File 13.4 KB