Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:20:12.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Kirby Canyon Conservation Agreement: A Model for the Resolution of Land-use Conflicts Involving Threatened Invertebrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Dennis D. Murphy
Dennis D. Murphy
Affiliation:
Research Programs Director, Center for Conservation Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Kirby Canyon Conservation Agreement was designed to provide protection of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis) while allowing development of an extensive solid-waste landfill in the habitat of that threatened subspecies. Elements of the programme include 1) biological research; 2) habitat acquisition; 3) habitat management; 4) restoration and revegetation activities; and 5) off-site recovery, including reintroduc-tion of the Butterfly into an unoccupied suitable habitat.

The high likelihood of success of this agreement reflects the availability of detailed life-history information, the known ecological characteristics of the Butterfly, and the geographic scale of the proposed development. This agreement should provide a useful model for the resolution of potential conflicts between endangered invertebrates and resource development in urban corridors elsewhere.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , Spring 1988 , pp. 45 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ehrlich, P.R. & Murphy, D.D. (1981). The population biology of checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas). Biol. Zbl., 100, pp. 613–29, illustr.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. & Murphy, D.D. (1987 a). Conservation lessons from long-term studies of checkerspot butterflies. J. Cons. Biol., 1, pp. 122–31, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. & Murphy, D.D. (1987 b). Monitoring populations on remnants of native vegetation. Pp. 201–10 in Nature Conservation: The Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation (Eds Saunders, D. et al. ), ‘Surrey Beatty’. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R., White, R.R., Singer, M.C., McKechnie, S.W. & Gilbert, L. (1975). Checkerspot butterflies: An historical perspective. Science, 188, pp. 221–8, illustr.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, S., Murphy, D.D. & Ehrlich, P.R. (in press). Meta-population ecology of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha bayensis. Amer. Nat.Google Scholar
Murphy, D.D. (in press). Challenges to preserving biological diversity in urban areas. In Proceedings of the National Forum on Biodiversity. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Murphy, D.D. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1980). Two California Checkerspot Butterfly subspecies: One new, one on the verge of extinction. J. Lepid. Soc., 34, pp. 316–20, illustr.Google Scholar
Murphy, D.D. & Ehrlich, P.R. (in press). The conservation Biology of California's remnant native grasslands. In California Grasslands: Structure and Productivity (Eds H. A. Mooney & L.F. Heunekke). Junk, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Murphy, D.D. & Weiss, S.B. (MS). Conservation biology of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis. (Submitted to Biological Conservation.)Google Scholar
Murphy, D.D. & Weiss, S.B. (in press). A method for monitoring larval population dynamics and size in an endangered butterfly, J. Appl. Ecol.Google Scholar
Weiss, S.B., White, R.R., Murphy, D.D. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1987). Growth and dispersal of larvae of the checkerspot butterfly. Euphydryas editha. Oikos, 50, pp. 161–6, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar