Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:54:12.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governance in integrated coastal zone management: a social networks analysis of cross-scale collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2013

LISA ERNOUL  and
ANGELA WARDELL-JOHNSON
LISA ERNOUL*
Affiliation:
Tour du Valat Research Centre, Le Sambuc, 13200 Arles, France UMR ESPACE, Aix-Marseille Université, Aix en Provence, France
ANGELA WARDELL-JOHNSON
Affiliation:
Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
*
*Correspondence: Ms Lisa Ernoul Fax: +33 4 90 97 20 19 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The Integrated Coastal Zone Management protocol of the Barcelona Convention sets governance objectives for countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea. This protocol emphasizes collaborative approaches to acknowledge the role of local people in coastal management. Evaluating the quality of governance processes is critical if coastal zone values are to be effectively managed in times of global climate change. This study examined the structure and attributes of collaborative governance networks in two Mediterranean deltas, the Camargue (France) and Gediz Delta (Turkey). A deliberative social catchment sampling was used to target actors with physical, cultural, social or economic ties. Forty-five different organizations/professions were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire to identify the frequency and quality of contacts, information flows, and subject matter relevant to natural resource management. There were higher levels of degree centrality and reciprocal ties in the Camargue, while the Gediz Delta had a greater homogeneity of actors, with one centralized influential actor. Civil society played a greater role in the Camargue network, and government organizations were more central in the Gediz Delta. The differences between the two sites call into question the use of the same integrated management strategies and suggest the need to acknowledge the importance of existing governance models and relationships within local contexts.

Keywords

Camargueconservation strategiesGedizgovernanceintegrated coastal zone managementsocial network analysisTurkey
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 231 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagla-Gokalp, L. (2000) Quelques Approches Sociologiques De Réseaux Sociaux. ASp 27–30 [www document]. URL http://asp.revues.org/2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreteau, O., Bots, P. & Daniell, K. (2010) A framework for clarifying ‘participation’ in participatory research to prevent its rejection for the wrong reasons. Ecology and Society 15 (2): 1 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art1/Google Scholar
Bellamy, J., McDonald, G., Syme, G. & Butterworth, J. (1999) Policy review evaluating integrated resource management. Society and Natural Resources 12 (4): 337–353.Google Scholar
Bonnet, B., Aulong, S., Goyet, S., Lutz, M. & Mathevet, R. (2005) Integrated Management of Mediterranean Wetlands. MedWet/Tour du Valat. Le Sambuc, France: MedWet/Tour du Valat.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S., Everett, M. & Freeman, L. (1999) UNICET 5 for Windows. Woftward for Social Network Analysis; User's Guide. Harvard Analytic Technologies [www document]. URL http://www.analytictech.com/Netdraw/netdraw.htm.Google Scholar
Brinkley, K., Fisher, M. & Gray, S. (2001) Complexity, society and resource management: the complex adaptive systems approach. In: Environment, Society and Natural Resource Management, ed. Lawrence, G., Higgins, V. and Lockie, S., pp. 241–254. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, D., Adger, W., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L. & Young, O. (2006) Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World. Ecology and Society 11 (2): [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/.Google Scholar
Cash, D. & Moser, S. (2000) Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change 10: 109–120.Google Scholar
Cicin-Sain, B. & Knecht, R. (1998) Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management: Concepts and Practices. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Consult-Forschung, Rupprecht & Beratung GmbH (2006) Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe, Final Report. International Ocean Institute. Cologne, Germany. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/iczm/pdf/evaluation_iczm_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Csaba, Z. & Pal, J. (2010) How negative networks are forming and changing in time? Theoretical overview and empirical analysis in two high-school classes. Review of Sociology 20 (2): 69–95.Google Scholar
Cummins, V., Mahony, C. & Connolly, N. (2003) Review of ICZM and principals of best practice. Technical review. Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland [www document]. URL http://www.heritagecouncil.ie/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Marine/coastal_zone_review.pdf http://www.heritagecouncil.ie/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Marine/coastal_zone_review.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dietz, T. & Stern, P. (2009) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Duane, T. (1997) Community participation in ecosystem management. Ecology Law Quarterly 24: 771–796.Google Scholar
Enserink, B., Patel, M., Kranz, N. & Maestu, J. (2007) Cultural factors as co-determinants of participation in river basin management. Ecology and Society 12 (2):24 [www document]. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art24/Google Scholar
Ernoul, L. & Yilmaz, E. (2012) Delta Du Gediz-Turquie: Contre Les Boues Illégales Qui Détient Les Clés De L'action? Espaces Naturels 38: 14–15.Google Scholar
European Commission (2000) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Integrated Coastal Zone Management: A Strategy for Europe”. Technical Report. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
European Commission (2007) Report to the European Parliament and the Council: An Evalaution of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Europe. Evaluation Report. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Everett, M. & Borgatti, S. (2005 a) Extending centrality. In: Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Volume 27. Strutctural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Everett, M. & Borgatti, S. (2005 b) Ego network betweenness. Social Networks 27 (1): 31–38.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2003) Social Capital, London, UK and New York, NY, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guattari, F. (2000) The Three Ecologies. London, UK: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Hanneman, R. & Riddle, J. (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California, Riverside, California, USA: 322 pp. [www document]. URL: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/Google Scholar
Hershman, M., Good, J., Bernd-Cohen, T., Lee, V. & Pogue, P. (1999) The effectiveness of coastal zone management in the United States. Coastal Management 28: 29–37.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Labianca, G. & Brass, D. (2006) Exploring the social ledger: negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE 31 (3): 596–614.Google Scholar
Magnin, G. & Yarar, M. (1997) Important Bird Areas in Turkey. ed. Dogal Hayati Koruna Dernegi. MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Margerum, R. (2007) Overcoming locally based collaboration constraints. Society and Natural Resources 20 (2): 135–152.Google Scholar
Mathevet, R. (2004) Camargue Incertaine: Sciences, Usages et Natures. Paris, France. Buchet-Chastel Editions.Google Scholar
Mela, A. (1995) Innovation, communication networks and urban mileus: a sociological approach. In Technological Change, Economic Development and Space, ed. Bertuglia, C.S., Fischer, M.M. & Preto, G.. pp. 75–91. Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Mermet, L., Billé, R., Leroy, M., Narcy, J. & Poux, X. (2005) L'analyse stratégique de la gestion environnementale: un cadre théorique pour penser l'efficacité en matière d'environnement. Natures Sciences Sociétés 13 (2): 127–137.Google Scholar
Moon, B. (2001) The impact of post-structuralism in theories informing public sector natural resource management practice. In: Environment, Society and Natural Resource Management, ed. Lawrence, G., Higgins, K.M. & Lockie, S.. pp. 255–269. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Moore, M. & Westley, F. (2011) Surmountable chasms: networks and social innovation for resilient systems. Ecology and Society 16 (1): 5.Google Scholar
Mullins, E. (2009) The Camargue. Portrait of a Wilderness. Oxford, UK: Signal Books Limited.Google Scholar
Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Quinn, C. & Reed, M. (2007) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. SRI Papers: 22 [www document]. URL http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/sriGoogle Scholar
Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Quinn, C. & Reed, M. (2008) Who's in the network?: when stakeholders influence data analysis. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21 (6): 443–458.Google Scholar
Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Quinn, C. & Reed, M. (2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 22 (6): 501–518.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsar (2007) Le Manuel De La Convention De Ramsar: Guide De La Convention Sur Les Zones Humides. Fourth Edition. Ramsar [www document]. URL http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/lib/lib_manual2006f.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sekercioglu, C.H., Anderson, S., Akçay, E., Bilgin, R., Can, Ö.E., Semiz, G., Tavzanoglu, C., Yokeş, M.B., Soyumert, A., Ipekdal, K., Saglam, I.K., Yücel, M. & Dalfes, H.M. (2011) Turkey's globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biological Conservation 144: 2752–2769.Google Scholar
Shipman, B. & Stojanovic, S. (2007) Facts, fictions and failures of integrated coastal zone management in Europe. Coastal Management 35 (2): 375–398.Google Scholar
Skvoretz, J. & Willer, D. (1993) Exclusion and power: a test of four theories of power in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 58 (6): 801–818.Google Scholar
Sorensen, J. (2000) Building a Global Database of ICM Efforts. Boston, CT, USA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J., Ellison, N. & Lampe, C. (2009) Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pp. 245–254 [www document]. URL https://www.msu.edu/~nellison/SteinfieldDiMiccoEllisonLampe2009.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stringer, L., Dougill, A., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C. & Reed, M. (2006) Unpacking ‘participation’ in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11 (2): 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trærup, S. (2012) Informal networks and resilience to climate change impacts: a collective approach to index insurance. Global Environmental Change 22 (1): 255–267.Google Scholar
Trumbic, I. (2009) Mediterranean protocol on integrated coastal zone management. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference/Workshop on the State of the Art of ICM in the Mediterranean and Black Sea: Immediate Needs for Research, Education/Training and Implementation, MED and BLACK SEA ICM 08, 14–18 October 2008, Akyaka, Mugla, ed, Ozhan, E.. Ankara, Turkey: MEDCOAST, Middle East Technical University: 225 pp.Google Scholar
Vickers, W. (1994) From opportunism to nascent conservation. Human Nature 5: 307–337.Google Scholar
Wardell-Johnson, A. (2005) Social relationships in landscape systems: identifying values and variables that drive social interactions. Proceedings from 11th ANZSYS/Managing the Complex V conference, New Zealand [www document]. URL http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/183006793Google Scholar
Wardell-Johnson, A. (2007) People in context: critical social dimensions in complex landscape systems. PhD thesis, Environmental Sociology, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia.Google Scholar
Wardell-Johnson, A. (2011) Value connections between people and landscapes. In Biodiversity and Social Justice: Practices for an Ecology of Peace, ed. Wardell-Johnson, A., Amram, N., Selvaratnam, R. & Ramakrishna, S., pp. 15–29. Perth, WA, Australia: Black Swan Press.Google Scholar
Wardell-Johnson, A., Selvaratnam, R. & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) Peace, justice and biodiversity. In Biodiversity and Social Justice: Practices for an Ecology of Peace, ed. Wardell-Johnson, A., Amram, N., Selvaratnam, R. & Ramakrishna, S., pp. 1–13. Perth, WA, Australia: Black Swan Press.Google Scholar
Westmacott, S. (2002) Where should the focus be in tropical integrated coastal management? Coastal Management 30 (1): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zikos, D. (2010) Community involvement in the implementation of the WFD in Greece. Ambientalia Special Issue Series (II): Ten Years of the Water Framework Directive: an Overview from Multiple Disciplines, pp. 1–20. Granada, Spain: Edificio Politécnico.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

ERNOUL et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download ERNOUL et al. supplementary material(File)
File 74.2 KB