Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:00:48.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of forest structure, management and landscape on bird and bat communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2016

AURELIE BOUVET ,
YOAN PAILLET Open the ORCID record for YOAN PAILLET [Opens in a new window] ,
FREDERIC ARCHAUX ,
LAURENT TILLON ,
PASCAL DENIS ,
OLIVIER GILG  and
FREDERIC GOSSELIN
AURELIE BOUVET
Affiliation:
Irstea, UR EFNO, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France
YOAN PAILLET*
Affiliation:
Irstea, UR EFNO, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France
FREDERIC ARCHAUX
Affiliation:
Irstea, UR EFNO, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France
LAURENT TILLON
Affiliation:
Office National des Forêts, Direction de l'Environnement et du Développement Durable, 2 Avenue de Saint-Mandé, F-75570 Paris Cedex 12, France
PASCAL DENIS
Affiliation:
Office National des Forêts, Direction de l'Environnement et du Développement Durable, 2 Avenue de Saint-Mandé, F-75570 Paris Cedex 12, France
OLIVIER GILG
Affiliation:
Réserves Naturelles de France, CS 67524, 21075 Dijon Cedex, France
FREDERIC GOSSELIN
Affiliation:
Irstea, UR EFNO, Domaine des Barres, F-45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France
*
*Correspondence: Yoan Paillet e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sustainable forest management aims to produce wood while preserving habitats for biodiversity, which is particularly challenging for vertebrates with local and landscape scale requirements, such as birds or bats. Managers need additional scientific evidence to help them balance conservative and integrative management methods. In this study, the relative influence of management abandonment, stand structure and landscape features on bird and bat communities in 14 managed and unmanaged forests in France is evaluated. Total birds and bats richness, richness for forest and threatened birds and edge-specialized bats significantly increased with total deadwood quantities. Richness of generalist, omnivorous and cavity-nesting birds was higher in unmanaged stands and richness of gleaner bats was positively influenced by the density of standing deadwood. By contrast, landscape variables had little influence on the different ecological groups but did have effects on individual species. Though the effects showed relatively limited magnitude, this study supports the value of deadwood and the importance of management abandonment for forest vertebrates. This study confirms that for integrated conservation strategies to be fully efficient they must be complemented by designating strict forest reserves because some target species groups depend on structural features found only at sufficient levels in those areas.

Keywords

batsbirdsdeadwoodforest managementspecies richnessstrict forest reserve
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 148 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. D., Law, B. S. & French, K. O. (2009) Vegetation structure influences the vertical stratification of open- and edge-space aerial-foraging bats in harvested forests. Forest Ecology and Management 258 (9): 2090–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, F. A., Edwards, D. P. & Hamer, K. C. (2011) Rehabilitation of logged rain forests: avifaunal composition, habitat structure, and implications for biodiversity-friendly REDD+. Biotropica 43 (4): 504–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archaux, F., Henry, P. Y. & Gimenez, O. (2012) When can we ignore the problem of imperfect detection in comparative studies? Methods In Ecology And Evolution 3 (1): 188–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archaux, F., Tillon, L., Fauvel, B. & Martin, H. (2013) Foraging habitat use by bats in a large temperate oak forest: importance of mature and regeneration stands. Le Rhinolophe 19: 47–58.Google Scholar
Bakermans, M. H., Rodewald, A. D. & Vitz, A. C. (2012) Influence of forest structure on density and nest success of mature forest birds in managed landscapes. Journal of Wildlife Management 76 (6): 1225–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barataud, M. (2012 a) Ecologie acoustique des chiroptères d'Europe: Identification des espèces, étude de leurs habitats et comportements de chasse. p.344. Montpellier, France: Biotope.Google Scholar
Barataud, M. (2012 b) Rapport d'étude: fréquentation des prairies de fauche par les chiroptères en chasse dans les Alpes du Sud (PN Mercantour; CCCV). p. 28. Rapport d’étude PN Mercantour: France.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2013) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4. R package version 1.1–7. [www document] URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 Google Scholar
Bauhus, J., Puettmann, K. & Messier, C. (2009) Silviculture for old-growth attributes. Forest Ecology and Management 258 (4): 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, J., Nilsson, S. G., Franc, A. & Menozzi, P. (2000) Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. Forest Ecology and Management 132 (1): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H. & White, J. S. S. (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 (3): 127–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollmann, K. & Braunisch, V. (2013) To integrate or to segregate: balancing commodity production and biodiversity conservation in European forests. In: Integrative Approaches as an Opportunity for the Conservation of Forest Biodiversity, eds. Kraus, D. & Krumm, F., pp. 18–31. Freiburg, Germany: European Forest Institute.Google Scholar
Brigham, R. M., Grindal, S. D., Firman, M. C. & Morissette, J. L. (1997) The influence of structural clutter on activity patterns of insectivorous bats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75 (1): 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Huyvaert, K. P. (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65 (1): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bütler, R., Lachat, T., Larrieu, L. & Paillet, Y. (2013) Habitat trees: key elements for forest biodiversity. In: Integrative Approaches as an Opportunity for the Conservation of Forest Biodiversity, eds. Kraus, D. & Krumm, F., pp. 84–91. Freiburg, Germany: European Forest Institute.Google Scholar
De Cáceres, M. & Legendre, P. (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90 (12): 3566–3574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devictor, V., Julliard, R. & Jiguet, F. (2008) Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117 (4): 507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, C., Von Helversen, O. & Nill, D. (2009) L'encyclopédie des Chauves-Souris d'Europe et d'Afrique du Nord: Biologie, Caractéristiques, Protection. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Dodd, L. E., Lacki, M. J., Britzke, E. R., Buehler, D. A., Keyser, P. D., Larkin, J. L., Rodewald, A. D., Wigley, T. B., Wood, P. B. & Rieske, L. K. (2012) Forest structure affects trophic linkages: how silvicultural disturbance impacts bats and their insect prey. Forest Ecology and Management 267: 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, P. F., Fuller, R. J., Evans, A. D. & Gough, S. J. (1998) Effects of forest management and grazing on breeding bird communities in plantations of broadleaved and coniferous trees in western England. Biological Conservation 85 (1–2): 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, J. L. & West, S. D. (2003) Associations of bats with local structure and landscape features of forested stands in western Oregon and Washington. Biological Conservation 109 (1): 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, I. & Chandler, R. (2011) Unmarked: an R Package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43 (10): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. J. & Whittington, P. A. (1987) Breeding bird distribution within Lincolnshire ash-lime woodlands: the influence of rides and the woodland edge. Acta Oecologica 8 (2): 259–268.Google Scholar
Germaine, S. S., Vessey, S. H. & Capen, D. E. (1997) Effects of small forest openings on the breeding bird community in a Vermont hardwood forest. The Condor 99 (3): 708–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. D., Vorisek, P., Van Strien, A., Gmelig Meyling, A. W., Jiguet, F., Fornasari, L., Reif, J., Chylarecki, P. & Burfield, I. J. (2007) Population trends of widespread woodland birds in Europe. Ibis 149 (Suppl. 2): 78–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagar, J. C., McComb, W. C. & Emmingham, W. H. (1996) Bird communities in commercially thinned and unthinned Douglas-fir stands of western Oregon. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24 (2): 353–365.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. (2000) Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. Annales Zoologici Fennici 37 (4): 271–280.Google Scholar
Hobson, K. A. & Bayne, E. (2000) The effects of stand age on avian communities in aspen-dominated forests of central Saskatchewan, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 136 (1–3): 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humes, M. L., Hayes, J. P. & Collopy, M. W. (1999) Bat activity in thinned, unthinned, and old-growth forests in Western Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 63 (2): 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbeau, L., Drapeau, P. & Mönkkönen, M. (2003) Are forest birds categorised as “edge species” strictly associated with edges? Ecography 26 (4): 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiguet, F., Devictor, V., Julliard, R. & Couvet, D. (2012) French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences. Acta Oecologica 44: 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokimäki, J. & Huhta, E. (1996) Effects of landscape matrix and habitat structure on a bird community in northern Finland: a multi-scale approach. Ornis Fennica 73 (3): 97–113.Google Scholar
Kalcounis, M. C., Hobson, K. A., Brigham, R. M. & Hecker, K. R. (1999) Bat activity in the boreal forest: importance of stand type and vertical strata. Journal of Mammalogy 80 (2): 673–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kéry, M. & Schmidt, B. R. (2008) Imperfect detection and its consequences for monitoring for conservation. Community Ecology 9 (2): 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanaposhtani, M. G., Kaboli, M., Karami, M. & Etemad, V. (2012) Effect of habitat complexity on richness, abundance and distributional pattern of forest birds. Environmental Management 50 (2): 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, A. J., Lacki, M. J. & Arnett, E. B. (2012) Research needs to support management and conservation of cavity-dependent birds and bats on forested landscapes in the Pacific Northwest. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 27 (3): 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laiolo, P., Rolando, A. & Valsania, V. (2004) Responses of birds to the natural re-establishment of wilderness in montane beechwoods of north-western Italy. Acta Oecologica 25 (1–2): 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassauce, A., Paillet, Y., Jactel, H. & Bouget, C. (2011) Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecological Indicators 11: 1027–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehle, C., Wigley, T. B., Rutzmoser, S., Gerwin, J. A., Keyser, P. D., Lancia, R. A., Reynolds, C. J., Thill, R. E., Weih, R., White, D. & Wood, P. B. (2005) Managed forest landscape structure and avian species richness in the southeastern US. Forest Ecology and Management 214 (1–3): 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCollin, D. (1998) Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. Ecography 21 (3): 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meffe, G. & Carrol, R. (1997) Principles of Conservation Biology. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer Press.Google Scholar
Menzel, J. M., Menzel, M. A. Jr, Kilgo, J. C., Ford, W. M., Edwards, J. W. & McCracken, G. F. (2005) Effect of habitat and foraging height on bat activity in the coastal plain of South Carolina. Journal of Wildlife Management 69 (1): 235–245.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J., Brandl, R., Buchner, J., Pretzsch, H., Seifert, S., Strätz, C., Veith, M. & Fenton, B. (2013) From ground to above canopy-bat activity in mature forests is driven by vegetation density and height. Forest Ecology and Management 306: 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, D.-A. (1999) Forest reserves. In: Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems, ed. Hunter, M. L. J., pp. 525–555. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. & Wagner, H. (2015) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.2–1. [www document] URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan Google Scholar
Paillet, Y., Bergès, L., Hjälten, J., Odor, P., Avon, C., Bernhardt-Romermann, M., Bijlsma, R. J., De Bruyn, L., Fuhr, M., Grandin, U., Kanka, R., Lundin, L., Luque, S., Magura, T., Matesanz, S., Meszaros, I., Sebastia, M. T., Schmidt, W., Standovar, T., Tothmeresz, B., Uotila, A., Valladares, F., Vellak, K. & Virtanen, R. (2010) Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conservation Biology 24 (1): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paillet, Y., Pernot, C., Boulanger, V., Debaive, N., Fuhr, M., Gilg, O. & Gosselin, F. (2015) Quantifying the recovery of old-growth attributes in forest reserves: a first reference for France. Forest Ecology and Management 346: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parviainen, J. (2005) Virgin and natural forests in the temperate zone of Europe. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 79 (1–2): 9–18.Google Scholar
Parviainen, J., Bücking, W., Vandekerkhove, K., Schuck, A. & Päivinen, R. (2000) Strict forest reserves in Europe: efforts to enhance biodiversity and research on forests left for free development in Europe (EU-COST-Action E4). Forestry 73 (2): 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Core Team, R (2012) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [www document] URL www/R-project.org Google Scholar
Regnery, B., Couvet, D., Kubarek, L., Julien, J. F. & Kerbiriou, C. (2013) Tree microhabitats as indicators of bird and bat communities in Mediterranean forests. Ecological Indicators 34: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffell, S. K., Gutzwiller, K. J. & Anderson, S. H. (1996) Does repeated human intrusion cause cumulative declines in avian richness and abundance? Ecological Applications 6 (2): 492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Römer, H., Lang, A. & Hartbauer, M. (2010) The signaller's dilemma: a cost-benefit analysis of public and private communication. PLoS ONE 5 (10): e13325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. W. (2007) The utilization of dead wood resources by woodpeckers in Britain. Ibis 149: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M. & Knight, T. M. (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19 (6): 305–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UICN France, MNHN, LPO, SOEF & ONCFS (2011) La liste rouge des espèces menacées en France. UICN: Paris, France.Google Scholar
Verheyen, K., Vellend, M., Van Calster, H., Peterken, G. & Hermy, M. (2004) Metapopulation dynamics in changing landscapes: a new spatially realistic model for forest plants. Ecology 85 (12): 3302–3312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villard, M. A., Kurtis Trzcinski, M. & Merriam, G. (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conservation Biology 13 (4): 774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarnowitz, J. E. & Manuwal, D. A. (1985) The effects of forest management on cavity-nesting birds in northwestern Washington. Journal of Wildlife Management 49 (1): 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellweger, F., Braunisch, V., Baltensweiler, A. & Bollmann, K. (2013) Remotely sensed forest structural complexity predicts multi species occurrence at the landscape scale. Forest Ecology and Management 307: 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Kissling, W. D. & He, F. (2013) Local forest structure, climate and human disturbance determine regional distribution of boreal bird species richness in Alberta, Canada. Journal of Biogeography 40 (6): 1131–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, W., Zhang, T., Zhu, Y. & Liu, J. S. (2012) Correlation pursuit: forward stepwise variable selection for index models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology 74 (5): 849–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods In Ecology And Evolution 1 (1): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bouvet supplementary material S1

Bouvet supplementary material

Download Bouvet supplementary material S1(File)
File 256.5 KB