Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:03:10.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of the network of protected areas of the South Caucasus at representing terrestrial ecosystems after the dissolution of the Soviet Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2016

CRISTIAN S. MONTALVO MANCHENO ,
NUGZAR ZAZANASHVILI  and
GIORGI BERUCHASHVILI
CRISTIAN S. MONTALVO MANCHENO*
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, 3/5 K. Cholokashvili Ave., 0162 Tbilisi, Georgia WWF Caucasus Programme Office, 11 M. Aleksidze Street, 0193 Tbilisi, Georgia
NUGZAR ZAZANASHVILI
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, 3/5 K. Cholokashvili Ave., 0162 Tbilisi, Georgia WWF Caucasus Programme Office, 11 M. Aleksidze Street, 0193 Tbilisi, Georgia
GIORGI BERUCHASHVILI
Affiliation:
WWF Caucasus Programme Office, 11 M. Aleksidze Street, 0193 Tbilisi, Georgia
*
*Correspondence: Cristian S. Montalvo Mancheno Tel: +593 2 450 2851; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Protected areas (PAs) have long been the foundation of conservation strategies to halt biodiversity losses and ecosystem degradation. In the South Caucasus (SC), coverage of PAs increased after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, yet how well biodiversity is represented in them is unknown. We utilized the PA downgrading, downsizing and degazettement (PADDD) conceptual framework and the gap analysis approach to assess how changes in the PAs of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia between 1991 and 2014 have affected the representation of biodiversity. Throughout this period, vegetation formations associated with high mountain ecosystems changed (≥17% representation). Colchic lowland vegetation formations which are only present in Georgia, also changed from unrepresented (0%) to under-represented (from 0% to <17%). The effect of PADDD events on biodiversity representation varied among countries depending on the amount of area gazetted after 1991. There is an inherent bias in the expansion of PAs in the SC. Our findings could be a first step towards changing the status quo by helping conservationists to strategically allocate resources towards ecosystems that are below 17% representation. Yet this will require governments in the SC to shift their views about PAs from being only national efforts to being key pieces of a larger-scale conservation strategy.

Keywords

representativenessgap analysisprotected area downgradingdownsizing and degazettement (PADDD)conservation planningvegetation formationsCaucasus ecoregion
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 158 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892916000424

References

Akhalkatsi, M. & Tarkhnashvili, D. (2012) Habitats of Georgia [www document]. URL https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233151704_Habitats_of_Georgia Google Scholar
APA (2014a) Protected areas [www document]. URL http://www.apa.gov.ge/en/protected-areas Google Scholar
APA (2014b) Agency of protected areas of Georgia: annual report [www document]. URL http://apa.gov.ge/uploads/other/1/1937.pdf Google Scholar
Askerov, E., Talibov, T., Manvelyan, K., Zazanashvili, N., Malkhasyan, A., Fatullayev, P. & Heidelberg, A. (2015) South-eastern lesser Caucasus: the most important landscape for conserving the leopard (Panthera pardus) in the Caucasus region (Mammalia: Felidae). Zoology in the Middle East 61: 95–101.Google Scholar
Bernard, E., Penna, L. A. O. & Araújo, E. (2014) Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil. Conservation Biology 28: 939–950.Google Scholar
Bohn, U., Gollub, G., Hettwer, C., Neuhäuslová, Z., Raus, T., Schlüter, H. & Weber, H. (2004) Interaktive CD-ROM zur Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas [www document]. URL http://www.floraweb.de/vegetation/dnld_eurovegmap.html Google Scholar
Brooks, T. M., Bakarr, M. I., Boucher, T., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Hilton-Taylor, C., Hoekstra, J. M. et al. (2004) Coverage provided by the global protected-area system: is it enough? BioScience 54: 1081–1091.Google Scholar
Carroll, C., Dunk, J. R. & Moilanen, A. (2010) Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Global Change Biology 16: 891–904.Google Scholar
Carwardine, J., Klein, C. J., Wilson, K. A., Pressey, R. L. & Possingham, H. P. (2009) Hitting the target and missing the point: target-based conservation planning in context. Conservation Letters 2: 4–11.Google Scholar
CBD (2004) COP 7 Decision VII/30. Strategic plan: future evaluation of progress [www document]. URL http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7767 Google Scholar
CBD (2010) COP 10 Decision X/2. Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 [www document]. URL http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268 Google Scholar
CBD (2014) Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 [www document]. URL https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo4/publication/gbo4-en-hr.pdf Google Scholar
CEPF (2003) Ecosystem profile: Caucasus biodiversity hotspot [www document]. URL http://www.cepf.net/Documents/final.caucasus.ep.pdf Google Scholar
Chape, S., Harrison, J., Spalding, M. & Lysenko, I. (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 360: 443–455.Google Scholar
Chazdon, R. L., Harvey, C. A., Komar, O., Griffith, D. M., Ferguson, B. G., Martínez-Ramos, M. et al. (2009) Beyond reserves: a research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41: 142–153.Google Scholar
DeClerck, F. A. J., Chazdon, R., Holl, K. D., Milder, J. C., Finegan, B., Martinez-Salinas, A. et al. (2010) Biodiversity conservation in human-modified landscapes of Mesoamerica: past, present and future. Biological Conservation 143: 2301–2313.Google Scholar
DeFries, R., Hansen, A., Turner, B. L., Reid, R. & Liu, J. (2007) Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecological Applications 17: 1031–1038.Google Scholar
Dietz, M. S., Belote, R. T., Aplet, G. H. & Aycrigg, J. L. (2015) The world's largest wilderness protection network after 50 years: an assessment of ecological system representation in the U.S. national wilderness preservation system. Biological Conservation 184: 431–438.Google Scholar
Eken, G., Bozdoğan, M., İsfendiyaroğlu, S., Kılıç, D. T. & Lise, Y. (2006) Türkiye'nin önemli doğa alanları [www document]. URL http://www.dogadernegi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/01_ONYAZI_CILT_1.pdf Google Scholar
ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
Fischer, J., Hartel, T. & Kuemmerle, T. (2012) Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation Letters 5: 167–175.Google Scholar
Fraser, S. E. M., Beresford, A. E., Peters, J., Redhead, J. W., Welch, A. J., Mayhew, P. J. & Dytham, C. (2009) Effectiveness of vegetation surrogates for parasitoid wasps in reserve selection. Conservation Biology 23: 142–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, A. J. & DeFries, R. (2007) Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecological Applications 17: 974–988.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. B., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. (2000) Conservation of insect diversity: a habitat approach. Conservation Biology 14: 1788–1797.Google Scholar
IUCN (1992) Protected Areas of the World: A Review of National Systems. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Joppa, L. N. & Pfaff, A. (2009) High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE 4: e8273.Google Scholar
Kozhevnikov, G. A. (1909) О необходимости устройства заповедных участков для охраны русской природы. In: Труды Всероссийского юбилейного аклиматизационного съезда 1908, pp. 18–30. Moscow.Google Scholar
Krever, V., Stishov, M. & Onufrenya, I. (2009) National Protected Areas of the Russian Federation: Gap Analysis and Perspective Framework. Moscow: WWF.Google Scholar
Krever, V., Zazanashvili, N., Jungius, H., Williams, L. & Petelin, D., eds. (2001) Biodiversity of the Caucasus Ecoregion: An Analysis of Biodiversity and Current Threats and Initial Investment Portfolio. Tbilisi: WWF.Google Scholar
Makhdoum, M. F. (2008) Management of protected areas and conservation of biodiversity in Iran. International Journal of Environmental Studies 65: 563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascia, M. B. & Pailler, S. (2011) Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conservation Letters 4: 9–20.Google Scholar
Mascia, M. B., Pailler, S., Krithivasan, R., Roshchanka, V., Burns, D., Mlotha, M. J. et al. (2014) Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, 1900–2010. Biological Conservation 169: 355–361.Google Scholar
Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan (2000) Action plan for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity's Programme of Work on Protected Areas [www document]. URL http://www.cbd.int/doc/world/az/az-nbsap-powpa-en.pdf Google Scholar
Ministry of Nature Protection of Armenia (1999) First national report to the Convention on Biological Diversity: a country study on the biodiversity of Armenia [www document]. URL http://www.cbd.int/doc/world/am/am-nr-01-en.pdf Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R. A., Robles Gil, P., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C. G. et al. eds. (2004) Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Mexico City: CEMEX, Agrupación Sierra Madre.Google Scholar
Montesino Pouzols, F., Toivonen, T., Di Minin, E., Kukkala, A. S., Kullberg, P., Kuustera, J. et al. (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516: 383–386.Google Scholar
Moravec, J. (1998) Reconstructed natural versus potential natural vegetation in vegetation mapping: a discussion of concepts. Applied Vegetation Science 1: 173–176.Google Scholar
Nakhutsrishvili, G., Zazanashvili, N., Batsatsashvili, K. & Montalvo Mancheno, C. S. (2015) Colchic and Hyrcanian forests of the Caucasus: similarities, differences and conservation status. Flora Mediterranea 25: 185–192.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Brooks, T. M. (2007) Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: the effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 713–737.Google Scholar
Rogers, H. M., Glew, L., Honzák, M. & Hudson, M. D. (2010) Prioritizing key biodiversity areas in Madagascar by including data on human pressure and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 96: 48–56.Google Scholar
Seiferling, I. S., Proulx, R., Peres-Neto, P. R., Fahrig, L. & Messier, C. (2011) Measuring protected-area isolation and correlations of isolation with land-use intensity and protection status. Conservation Biology 26: 610–618.Google Scholar
Sokolova, V. E. & Syroechkovskii, E. E., eds. (1990) Эароведники СССР: Эароведники Кавкаэа;. Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar
Venter, O., Fuller, R. A., Segan, D. B., Carwardine, J., Brooks, T., Butchart, S. H. M. et al. (2014) Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biology 12: e1001891.Google Scholar
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515: 67–73.Google Scholar
Williams, L., Zazanashvili, N., Sanadiradze, G. & Kandaurov, A., eds. (2006) An Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasus. Tbilisi: WWF, BMZ, KfW, CEPF, MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
Woodley, S., Bertzky, B., Crawhall, N., Dudley, N., Londoño, J. M., MacKinnon, K. et al. (2012) Meeting Aichi target 11: what does success look like for protected area systems? Parks 18: 23–36.Google Scholar
WWF (2009) Database on Protected Areas and Forest in the South Caucasus (2008–2013). Tbilisi: WWF.Google Scholar
WWF (2015) Promotion of eco-corridors in the southern Caucasus [www document]. URL http://wwf.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/armenia/projects/ongoing/eco_corridors/ Google Scholar
Zazanashvili, N. (2005) Application of the map of natural vegetation of Europe in developing a protected areas network in the Caucasus ecoregion. In: Application and Analysis of the Map of Natural Vegetation of Europe, eds. Bohn, U., Hettwer, C. & Gollub, G., pp. 251–262. Bonn: Budesamt für Naturschutz (BfN).Google Scholar
Zazanashvili, N. & Mallon, D., eds. (2009) Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Montalvo Mancheno supplementary material S1

Supplementary Figure

Download Montalvo Mancheno supplementary material S1(Image)
Image 41.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Montalvo Mancheno supplementary material S2

Supplementary Figure

Download Montalvo Mancheno supplementary material S2(Image)
Image 935.4 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Montalvo Mancheno supplementary material S3

Supplementary Table

Download Montalvo Mancheno supplementary material S3(PDF)
PDF 62.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Montalvo Mancheno supplementary material S4

Supplementary Table

Download Montalvo Mancheno supplementary material S4(PDF)
PDF 62.4 KB