Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:14:18.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(Dis)agreements in the management of conservation conflicts in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2020

Malena Oliva ,
Eduardo García-Frapolli Open the ORCID record for Eduardo García-Frapolli [Opens in a new window] ,
Luciana Porter-Bolland  and
Salvador Montiel
Malena Oliva
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex-Hacienda San José de la Huerta, CP 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
Eduardo García-Frapolli*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex-Hacienda San José de la Huerta, CP 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
Luciana Porter-Bolland
Affiliation:
Red de Ecología Funcional, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., El Haya, Xalapa, Veracruz91070, Mexico
Salvador Montiel
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología Humana, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Unidad Mérida, México, Km. 6 antigua carretera a Progreso, Mérida, Yucatán97310, Mexico
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Eduardo García-Frapolli, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

To manage widespread conservation conflicts, building a shared understanding among the parties involved has been considered key. However, there is little empirical evidence of the role this understanding might play in the context of imposed biosphere reserves. Using semi-structured and in-depth interviews in two communities within the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, we explored whether or not there is a shared understanding of conflicts between local people and reserve managers, and we analysed its contribution to conflict management. We found that a shared understanding is not a determining factor when the conflict solution demands actions that exceed stakeholders’ functions. While a shared understanding helps with the global process of conflict management, there are other challenges: local impairment resulting from the exclusionary creation and the operation of protected areas and the need for action to solve a conflict that exceeds the functions of stakeholders.

Keywords

local livelihoodsprotected areasshared understandingstakeholders’ perspectives
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 295 - 303
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, MW, Teisl, MF, Noblet, CL (2016) Whose values count: is a theory of social choice for sustainability science possible? Sustainability Science 11: 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baynham-Herd, Z, Redpath, S, Bunnefeld, N, Molony, T, Keane, A (2018) Conservation conflicts: behavioural threats, frames, and intervention recommendations. Biological Conservation 222: 180–188.Google Scholar
Bennett, NJ, Dearden, P (2014) Why local people do not support conservation: community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy 44: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, S, Athreya, V, Grenyer, R, Macdonald, DW (2013) Understanding the role of representations of human–leopard conflict in Mumbai through media-content analysis. Conservation Biology 27: 588–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CBD (2011) Aichi Biodiversity Targets [www document]. URL https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets Google Scholar
Chape, S, Harrison, J, Spalding, M, Lysenko, I (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Science 360: 433–455.Google ScholarPubMed
CONANP (1999) Programa de Manejo de la Reserva de la Biosfera Calakmul, México. Distrito Federal, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Ecología.Google Scholar
CONANP (2015) Estudio Previo Justificativo para la modificación de la declaratoria de la Reserva de la Biosfera Calakmul. Campeche, Mexico: CONANP.Google Scholar
Cumming, GS (2016) The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the Anthropocene. Anthropocene 13: 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Pourcq, K, Thomas, E, Arts, B, Vranckx, A, León-Sicard, T, Van Damme, P (2015) Conflict in protected areas: who says co-management does not work? PLoS ONE 10(12): e0144943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dower, N (2015) Conservation conflicts: ethical issues. In: Redpath, SM, Gutiérrez, RJ, Wood, KA, Young, JC (eds), Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating towards Solutions (pp. 137–148). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, AA (2008) Towards a shared systems model of stakeholders in environmental conflict. International Transactions in Operational Research 15: 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, JA (2006) A participatory approach to conservation in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Campeche, Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning 74: 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galindo-Leal, C (1999) La gran región de Calakmul: prioridades biológicas de conservación y propuesta de modificación de la Reserva de la Biosfera. Distrito Federal, Mexico: World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
García-Frapolli, E, Ramos-Fernández, G, Galicia, E, Serrano, A (2009) The complex reality of biodiversity conservation through Natural Protected Area policy: three cases from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Land Use Policy 26: 715–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halffter, G (2011). Reservas de la Biósfera: Problemas y Oportunidades en México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 27: 177–189.Google Scholar
Holland, A (2015) Philosophy, conflict and conservation. In: Redpath, SM, Gutiérrez, RJ, Wood, KA, Young, JC (eds), Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating towards Solutions (pp. 19–29). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INEGI (1996) Plano producido para el Registro Agrario Nacional. Ejido NCPE Centauro del Norte , Clave 103 . Distrito Federal, Mexico: INEGI.Google Scholar
INEGI (2010) Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010 [www document]. URL https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2010/default.html Google Scholar
Karst, HE, Nepal, SK (2019) Conservation, development and stakeholder relations in Bhutanese protected area management. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 26: 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecuyer, L, White, RM, Schmook, B, Calmé, S (2018) Building on common ground to address biodiversity conflicts and foster collaboration in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 220: 217–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Marshall, K, White, R, Fischer, A (2007) Conflicts between humans over wildlife management: on the diversity of stakeholder attitudes and implications for conflict management. Biodiversity Conservation 16: 3129–3146.Google Scholar
Masterson, VA, Spierenburg, M, Tengö, M (2019) The trade-offs of win–win conservation rhetoric: exploring place meanings in community conservation on the Wild Coast, South Africa. Sustainability Science 14: 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathevet, R, Thompson, JD, Folke, C, Chapin, FS (2016) Protected areas and their surrounding territory: socioecological systems in the context of ecological solidarity. Ecological Applications 26: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newing, H (2011). Conducting Research in Conservation: A Social Science Perspective, New York, NY, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oliva, M, García-Frapolli, E, Porter-Bolland, L, Montiel, S (2019) Early detection of conflicts for the management of protected areas: the case of charcoal production in the Los Petenes Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Environmental Management 64: 52–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacheco, P, Benatti, JH (2015) Tenure security and land appropriation under changing environmental governance in lowland Bolivia and Pará. Forests 6: 464–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Periódico, Oficial (2000) Aviso de Deslinde de Terreno de Presunta Propiedad Nacional. San Francisco de Campeche, Mexico: Periódico Oficial.Google Scholar
Ranger, S, Kenterb, JO, Bryce, R, Cumming, G, Dapling, T, Lawes, E, Richardson, PB (2016) Forming shared values in conservation management: an interpretive deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices. Ecosystem Services 21: 310–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redpath, SM, Gutiérrez, RJ, Wood, KA, Sidaway, R, Young, JC (2015a) An introduction to conservation conflicts. In: Redpath, SM, Gutiérrez, RJ, Wood, KA, Young, JC (eds), Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating towards Solutions (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redpath, SM, Gutiérrez, RJ, Wood, KA, Young, JC (2015b) Finding a way out of conservation conflicts. In: Redpath, SM, Gutiérrez, RJ, Wood, KA, Young, JC (eds), Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating towards Solutions (pp. 287–300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redpath, SM, Young, J, Evely, A, Adams, WM, Sutherland, WJ, Whitehouse, A et al. (2013) Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 100–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz-Mallén, I, Corbera, E, Calvo-Boyero, D, Reyes-García, V, Brown, K (2015a) How do biosphere reserves influence local vulnerability and adaptation? Evidence from Latin America. Global Environmental Change 33: 97–108.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Mallén, I, Corbera, E, Calvo-Boyero, D, Reyes-García, V, Brown, K (2015b) Participatory scenarios to explore local adaptation to global change in biosphere reserves: Experiences from Bolivia and Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy 54: 398–408.Google Scholar
Sosa-Montes, M, Durán-Ferman, P, Hernández-García, MA (2012) Relaciones socioambientales entre comunidades y áreas naturales protegidas. Reserva de la Biosfera Calakmul: entre el conflicto y la conservación. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 18: 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouwborst, A (2015) Law and conservation conflicts. In: Redpath, SM, Gutiérrez, RJ, Wood, KA, Young, JC (eds), Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating towards Solutions (pp. 108–118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venter, O, Fuller, RA, Segan, DB, Carwardine, J, Brooks, T, Butchart, SH et al. (2014) Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biology 12(6): e1001891.Google ScholarPubMed
Visconti, P, Butchart, SHM, Brooks, TM, Langhammer, PF, Marnewick, D, Vergara, S et al. (2019) Protected area targets post-2020. Outcome-based targets are needed to achieve biodiversity goals. Science 364: 239–241.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, E, Bedelian, C, Dawson, N, Barnes, P (2018) Social impacts of protected areas: exploring evidence of trade-offs and synergies. In: Schreckenberg, K, Mace, G, Poudyal, M (eds), Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation: Trade-offs and Governance (pp. 222–240). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, E, Homewood, KM, Beauchamp, E, Clements, T, McCabe, JT, Wilkie, D, Milner-Gulland, EJ (2015) Guiding principles for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on human well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B370: 20150103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, JC, Marzano, M, White, RM, McCracken, DI, Redpath, SM, Carss, DN et al. (2010) The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: characteristics and management strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 3973–3990.Google Scholar
Young, JC, Searle, K, Butler, A, Simmons, P, Watt, AD, Jordan, A (2016) The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts. Biological Conservation 195: 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar