Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:32:44.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing an offsetting programme: tensions, dilemmas and difficulties in biodiversity market-making in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2015

ANDY LOCKHART
ANDY LOCKHART*
Affiliation:
Department of Town and Regional Planning, University Of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
*
*Correspondence: Andy Lockhart e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In 2011, the UK government set in motion a process to establish a formal biodiversity offsetting programme in England, as an attempt to tackle biodiversity loss as a result of development. Drawing on critical approaches to the commodification of nature, this article traces the dilemmas encountered by the UK government in its endeavours to roll out a biodiversity offsetting programme in the English planning system. Based on 34 in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, documentary analysis and participant observation at policy-focused events, the paper aims to show how the promise of reconciling development and conservation proved difficult to deliver. In government attempts to enrol sympathetic actors, disputes emerged over the purpose and fine detail of the proposals. Deeper tensions were revealed in clashes between governmental emphasis on deregulation and advocates’ calls for strong mandatory rules and well-resourced oversight, while efforts to balance complex ecology with market demands for simplicity and certainty undermined the promise of objective biodiversity metrics delivering uncontroversial hard numbers. Though the English case is in many ways context-specific, the problems experienced raise wider political questions around establishing meaningful offsetting schemes in any part of the world.

Keywords

biodiversitybiodiversity offsettingcommodification of natureEnglandmarket environmentalismregulationUK
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 42 , Issue 4: Thematic section: Tradable Rights in Conservation , December 2015 , pp. 335 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldersgate Group (2013) Written evidence submitted by the Aldersgate Group [www document]. URL http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmenvaud/750/75012.htm Google Scholar
Bakker, K. & Bridge, G. (2006) Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’. Progress in Human Geography 30 (1): 5–27.Google Scholar
Bayon, R. & Jenkins, M. (2010) The business of biodiversity. Nature 466: 184–185.Google Scholar
Benabou, S. (2014) Making up for lost nature? A critical review of the international development of voluntary biodiversity offsets. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 5 (1): 103–123.Google Scholar
BIS [UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills] (2013) Better Regulation Framework Manual: Practical Guidance for UK Government Officials [www document]. URL https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/better-regulation-framework-manual Google Scholar
British Ecological Society (2013) Biodiversity offsetting. What does the science say? Report [www document]. URL http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/Biodiversity-offsetting-BES-report-FINAL.pdf Google Scholar
Burgin, S. (2008) BioBanking: an environmental scientist's view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 17 (4): 807–816.Google Scholar
Büscher, B., Dressler, W. & Fletcher, R. eds (2014) Nature Inc.: Environmental Conservation in the Neoliberal Age. Second edition. Tucson, AZ, USA: University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büscher, B., Sullivan, S., Neves, K., Igoe, J. & Brockington, D. (2012) Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism 23 (2): 4–30.Google Scholar
Carton, W. (2014) Environmental protection as market pathology? Carbon trading and the dialectics of the ‘double movement’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (6): 1002–1018.Google Scholar
Castree, N. (2003) Commodifying what nature? Progress in Human Geography 27 (3): 273–297.Google Scholar
Castree, N. (2008 a) Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A 40 (1): 131–152.Google Scholar
Castree, N. (2008 b) Neoliberalising nature: processes, effects, and evaluations. Environment and Planning A 40 (1): 153–173.Google Scholar
Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (2013) Consultation Response: Biodiversity Offsetting in England Green Paper (Defra) [www document]. URL http://www.cieem.net/data/files/Resource_Library/Policy/Consultation_Responses/CIEEM_offsetting_response_FINAL.pdf Google Scholar
Curran, M., Hellweg, S. & Beck, J. (2013) Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy? Ecological Applications 24 (4): 617–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David Tyldesley and Associates (2012) Planning policy and biodiversity offsets: report on phase II research. Effectiveness of the application of current planning policy in the town and country planning system [www document]. URL http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=10054_PhaseIIFINALREPORTPDF.pdf Google Scholar
Davies, W. (2014) The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
DCLG (2005) Planning Policy Statement 9: Biodiversity and Geological Conservation [www document]. URL http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/planning/planningpolicyandlegislation/previousenglishpolicy/ppgpps/pps9 Google Scholar
DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework [www document]. URL https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf Google Scholar
Defra (2011) The Natural Environment White Paper: the natural choice. Securing the value of nature [www document]. URL https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228842/8082.pdf Google Scholar
Defra (2013) Biodiversity offsetting in England: Green Paper [www document]. URL https://consult.defra.gov.uk/biodiversity/biodiversity_offsetting/supporting_documents/20130903Biodiversity%20offsetting%20green%20paper.pdf Google Scholar
Elliott, L. (2014) UK economic recovery? Don't bet the house on it, warns IMF [www document]. URL http://www.theguardian.com/business/economics-blog/2014/jun/06/uk-economy-dont-bet-house-imf-larry-elliott Google Scholar
EMTF (2013) Realising nature's value: the final report of the Ecosystem Markets Task Force [www document]. URL http://www.defra.gov.uk/ecosystem-markets/files/Ecosystem-Markets-Task-Force-Final-Report-.pdf Google Scholar
Energy, UK (2013) Response to Defra consultation on Biodiversity Offsetting in England: Green Paper [www document]. URL http://www.energy-uk.org.uk/publication/finish/158/973.html Google Scholar
Environmental Audit Committee (2013) Biodiversity offsetting. Sixth report of session 2013–14 [www document]. URL http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmenvaud/750/750.pdf Google Scholar
Environment Bank (2013) Environment Bank response to Defra consultation on Green Paper on biodiversity offsetting [www document]. URL http://www.environmentbank.com/files/eb-defra-gp-response-final.pdf Google Scholar
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee (2012) Natural Environment White Paper. Fourth report of session 2012–13, Volume II [www document]. URL http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmenvfru/492/492vw.pdf Google Scholar
European Commission (2015) REFIT: making EU law lighter, simpler and less costly [www document]. URL http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/refit/index_en.htm Google Scholar
Evans, S. (2013) Biodiversity offsetting pilots: one year on. The ENDS Report 459: 38–42.Google Scholar
Gardner, T., Von Hase, A., Brownlie, S., Ekstrom, J., Pilgrim, J., Savy, C., Stephens, R., Treweek, J., Ussher, G., Ward, G. & ten Kate, K. (2013) Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss. Conservation Biology 27 (6): 1254– 1264.Google Scholar
Gomez-Baggethun, E. & Ruiz-Perez, M. (2011) Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography 35 (5): 613–628.Google Scholar
Heynen, N., Kaika, M. & Swyngedouw, E. (2006) Urban political ecology: politicizing the production of urban natures. In: In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, ed. Heynen, N., Kaika, M. & Swyngedouw, E., pp. 1–20. London, UK and New York, USA: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heynen, N., McCarthy, J., Prudham, S. & Robbins, P., eds (2007) Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Home Builders Federation (2013) Written evidence submitted by the Home Builders Federation [www document]. URL http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3032 Google Scholar
Jowit, J. (2010) Spending review: ‘Greenest government ever’ reserves worst cuts for Defra [www document]. URL http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/oct/20/spending-review-cuts-environment Google Scholar
Kaminski, I. (2014) Europe urged to copy UK's red tape challenge [www document]. URL http://www.endsreport.com/45737/europe-urged-to-copy-uks-red-tape-challenge Google Scholar
Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Kandy, D. & Bennett, G. (2011) 2011 Update: State of Biodiversity Markets [www document]. URL http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/reports/2011_update_sbdm Google Scholar
Maron, M., Hobbs, R., Moilanen, A., Matthews, J., Christie, K., Gardner, T., Keith, D., Lindenmayer, D. & McAlpine, C. (2012) Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation 155 (3): 141–148.Google Scholar
Mathiesen, K. (2013) Is biodiversity offsetting a ‘license to trash nature’? [www document]. URL http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/nov/12/biodiversity-offsetting-license-trash-nature Google Scholar
McAfee, K. (1999) Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17 (2): 133–154.Google Scholar
Milne, R. (2012) Minister criticises ‘regulatory creep’ of EU rules on planning [www document]. URL http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/general/news/stories/2012/dec12/131212/131212_2 Google Scholar
Newey, G. (2012) Nurturing nature: policy to protect and improve biodiversity [www document]. URL http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/images/publications/nurturing%20nature.pdf Google Scholar
Oxford, M. (2013) Ecological capacity and competence in local planning authorities: what is needed to deliver statutory obligations for biodiversity? [www document]. URL http://www.cieem.net/data/files/Resource_Library/News/ALGE_Report_on_Ecological_Competence_and_Capacity.pdf Google Scholar
Penca, J. (2013) Marketing the Market: The Ideology of Market Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation. Transnational Environmental Law 2 (2): 235–257.Google Scholar
Prudham, S. (2009) Commodification. In: A Companion to Environmental Geography, eds Castree, N., Demeritt, D., Liverman, D., & Rhoads, B., pp. 123–142. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, M. (2004) The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35 (3): 361–373.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. (2006) The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (3): 367–387.Google Scholar
RSPB (2013) Consultation on the Green Paper on Biodiversity Offsetting [www document]. URL https://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/biodiversity-offsetting_tcm9--358604.pdf Google Scholar
Sukhdev, P. (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB [www document]. URL http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf Google Scholar
Takacs, D. (1996) The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
ten Kate, K., Bishop, J. & Bayon, R. (2004) Biodiversity offsets: views, experience, and the business case [www document]. URL http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/bdoffsets.pdf Google Scholar
Government, UK (1990) Town and country planning act 1990. Section 106 [www document]. URL http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/8/section/106 Google Scholar
Vadrot, A. (2014) The Politics of Knowledge and Global Biodiversity. London, UK and New York, USA: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, S., Brower, A., Stephens, R. & Lee, W. (2009) Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters 2 (4): 149–157.Google Scholar