Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:09:02.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratic decentralization in sub-Saharan Africa: its contribution to forest management, livelihoods, and enfranchisement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

J. C. RIBOT ,
J. F. LUND  and
T. TREUE
J. C. RIBOT*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Illinois, 607 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
J. F. LUND
Affiliation:
Forest & Landscape Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
T. TREUE
Affiliation:
Forest & Landscape Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
*Correspondence: Dr J. C. Ribot e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Efforts to promote popular participation in forest management in Sub-Saharan Africa have faced many obstacles and disappointments. Although promises of improvements in relation to forest management, rural livelihoods and local enfranchisement have been achieved in some cases, accounts of frustration outnumber those of success. Focusing on participation through democratic decentralization (namely the transfer of meaningful discretionary powers to local representative authorities), this paper reviews recent empirical studies on the outcomes of popular participation in forest management. The implementation of decentralization of forest management, and ecological, livelihood and democracy outcomes are examined, and misconceptions in analyses of decentralized forestry are explored. The expected benefits of democratic decentralization within forestry are rarely realized because democratic decentralization is rarely established. In most cases, local authorities do not represent the local population or their space of discretion is so narrow that they have little effect on management. There is little official local management taking place, even under so-called decentralized or participatory management arrangements. If ever significant space for local discretion under democratic authorities is created, researchers will have the opportunity to study whether democratic decentralization can deliver the theoretically promised positive outcomes. Nevertheless, some cases shed light on effects of local decision making. Three general observations are made on effects of decentralization. First, environmental, livelihood and democracy objectives are not always mutually reinforcing, and under some circumstances they may be at odds. Second, environmental effects of improved forest management often result in benefits accruing to distant or higher-scale aggregate populations, while local communities carry the costs. Third, poor peoples' use of natural resources to maintain their livelihoods often conflicts with profit and revenue interests of local elites, national commercial interests and governments. A negotiated minimum social and environmental standards approach to decentralization of forest management may safeguard essential ecological functions and at the same time protect essential livelihood and economic values of forests at all scales of society. The remainder of decisions, such as how forests are used, by whom and for what, could then be safely placed at the discretion of responsive local representatives.

Keywords

Africacommunity-baseddecentralizedforestlivelihoodmanagement
Type
THEMATIC SECTION: Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 1)
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 37 , Issue 1: Thematic section. Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 1) , March 2010 , pp. 35 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. (2005) Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, USA: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Chhatre, A. (2006) Explaining success on the commons: community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Development 34: 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Ribot, J.C. (1999) Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and African cases. Journal of Developing Areas 33: 473–502.Google Scholar
Assembe Mvondo, S. (2006) Decentralized forest resources and access of minorities to environmental justice: an analysis of the case of the Baka in Southern Cameroon. International Journal of Environmental Studies 63: 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banana, A.Y., Vogt, N.D., Bahati, J. & Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W. (2007) Decentralized governance and ecological health: why local institutions fail to moderate deforestation in Mpigi district of Uganda. Scientific Research and Essay 2: 434–445.Google Scholar
Bandiaky, S. (2007) Engendering exclusion in Senegal's democratic decentralization: subordinating women through participatory natural resource management. Representation, Equity and Environment Working Paper Series. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Bates, R.H. (1981) Markets and States in Tropical Africa. The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. Los Angeles, USA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bazaara, N. (2003) Decentralization, politics and environment in Uganda. Environmental Governance in Africa Working Paper No. 7. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Bazaara, N. (2006) Subjecting nature to central authority: the struggle over public goods in the formation of citizenship. African Development 31:21–37.Google Scholar
Benjamin, C.E. (2008) Legal pluralism and decentralization: natural resource management in Mali. World Development 36: 2255–2276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, P. (2006) Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34: 1942–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, T., Pfliegner, K., Isango, J., Zahabu, E., Ahrends, A. & Burgess, N.D. (2008) Seeing the wood for the trees: an assessment of the impact of participatory forest management on forest condition in Tanzania. Oryx 42: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockington, D. (2007) Forests, community conservation and local government performance: the village forest reserves of Tanzania. Society and Natural Resources 20: 835–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buur, L. & Kyed, H.M., eds (2007) State Recognition and Democratization in sub-Saharan Africa. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B., Mandodo, A., Nemarundwe, N., Sithole, B., Dejong, W., Luckert, M., & Matose, F. (2001) Challenges to proponents of common property resource systems: despairing voices from the social forests of Zimbabwe. World Development 29: 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B.M., Jeffrey, S., Kozanayi, W., Luckert, M., Mutamba, M. & Zindi, C. (2002) Household Livelihoods in the Semi-Arid Regions: Options and Constraints. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
Cavendish, W. (2000) Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of African rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development 28: 1979–2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. (1994) Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development. In: Power and Participatory Development. Theory and Practice, ed. Nelson, N. & Wright, S., pp. 30–42. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1996) The Anti-Politics Machine. Development, Depolitization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feyissa, D. (2006) Decentralization as ethnic closure, with special reference to a declining negotiated access to natural resources in Western Ethiopia. Africa Development 31: 243–260.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, A. (1998) Survey article: subsidiarity. Journal of Political Philosophy 6:190–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, C.P., Lund, J.F. & Treue, T. (2009) Neither fast, nor easy. The implementation of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Ghana. International Forestry Review 11: 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobley, M., ed. (1996) Participatory forestry: the process of change in India and Nepal. Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 3. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Kajembe, G.C., Nduwamungu, J. & Luoga, E.J. (2006) The impact of community based forest management and joint forest management on the forest resource base and local people's livelihoods: case studies from Tanzania. Commons Southern Africa occasional series 8. Zimbabwe: University of Harare.Google Scholar
Kulipossa, F.P. (2004) Decentralisation and democracy in developing countries: an overview. Development in Practice 14: 768–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A.M. (2003) Decentralization and forest management in Latin America: towards a working model. Public Administration and Development 23 (3): 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A.M. & Ribot, J.C. (2007) The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field. Sustainability Science 2: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, J. (1998) Designing legal space: law as an enabling tool in community-based management [www document]. URL http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/97605/conatrem/conatrem/documents/Lindsay-Ppt.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lund, J.F. (2007) Is small beautiful? Village level taxation of natural resources in Tanzania. Public Administration and Development 27: 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, J.F. & Treue, T. (2008) Are we getting there? Evidence of decentralized forest management from the Tanzanian miombo woodlands. World Development 36: 2780–2800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, J.F., Balooni, K. & Casse, T. (2009) Change we can believe in? Reviewing studies on the conservation impact of popular participation in forest management. Conservation and Society 7 (2): 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, J.F., Helles, F. & Treue, T. (2007) Decentralised forest management: reasons for official ambiguities and guide to donors [www document]. URL http://en.sl.life.ku.dk/upload/policy_briefs_no_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Madondo, A. & Kozanayi, W. (2006) Demand-driven model of decentralized land-use planning and natural resource management: experiences from Chiredzi District of Zimbabwe. Africa Development 31: 103–122.Google Scholar
Manin, B., Przeworski, A. & Stokes, S. (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manor, J. (1999) The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington DC, USA: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mawhood, P. (1983) Local Government in the Third World. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Meshack, C.K., Adhikari, B., Doggart, N. & Lovett, J.C. (2006) Transaction costs of community-based forest management: empirical evidence from Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 44: 468–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhereza, F. (2003) Environmental decentralization and the management of forest resources in Masindi District, Uganda. Environmental Governance in Africa working paper 8. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Muhereza, F. (2006) Decentralizing natural resource management and the politics of institutional resource management in Uganda's forest sub-sector. Africa Development 31: 67–102.Google Scholar
Mustalahti, I. & Lund, J.F. (2010) Where and how can participatory forest management succeed? Learning from Tanzania, Mozambique and Laos. Society and Natural Resources 23: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemarundwe, N. (2004) Social characters and organisation for access to woodlands: institutional implications for devolving responsibilities for resource management to the local level in Chivi District, Zimbabwe. Society and Natural Resources 17: 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2004) One step forward, two steps back? Paradoxes of natural resources management decentralization in Cameroon. Journal of Modern African Studies 42: 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2005) The social and organisational roots of ecological uncertainties in Cameroon's forest management decentralization model. In: Democratic Decentralization Through a Natural Resource Lens, ed. Ribot, J.C. & Larson, A.M., pp. 174–191. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oyono, P.R. & Efoua, S. (2006) Qui represente qui ? Choix organisationnels, identites sociales et formation d'une elite forestiere au Cameroon. Africa Development 31: 147–182.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, S.K. & Sills, E.O. (2001) Do tropical forests provide natural insurance? The microeconomics of non-timber forest product collection in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Economics 77: 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persha, L. & Blomley, T. (2009) Management decentralization and montane forest conditions in Tanzania. Conservation Biology 23: 1485–1496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrasek, D., El Tom, F. & Archer, R. (2002) Local rule: decentralisation and human rights. Geneva, Switzerland: International Council on Human Rights Policy.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. (1998) Theorizing access: forest profits along Senegal's charcoal commodity chain. Development and Change 29: 307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, J.C. (1999) Decentralization and participation in Sahelian forestry: legal instruments of central political-administrative control. Africa 69: 24–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, J.C. (2004) Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. (2009) Access over authority: recentralizing benefits in Senegal's forestry decentralization. Development and Change 40: 105–129. See film version of this article [www document]. URL http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498292104301059460#CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, J.C. & Mearns, R. (2008) Steering community driven development? A desk study of NRM choices. WRI Environmental Governance in Africa Working Paper series [www document]. URL http://www.wri.org/publication/steering-community-driven-development.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. & Oyono, R. (2005) The politics of decentralization. In: Toward a New Map of Africa, ed. Wisner, B., Toulmin, C. & Chitiga, R., pp. 88–113. London, UK: Earthscan Press.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. & Oyono, R. (2006) Decentralization in Africa: an overview. Africa Development 31: 1–19.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. & Peluso, N.L. (2003) A theory of access, Rural Sociology 68: 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, J.C., Chhatre, A. & Lankina, T. (2008) Institutional choice and recognition in the formation and consolidation of local democracy. Representation, Equity and Environment Working Paper Series. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Rihoy, E.C. & Maguranyanga, B. (2007) Devolution and democratisation of natural resource management in Southern Africa: a comparative analysis of CBNRM policy processes in Botswana and Zimbabwe. CASS-PLAAS CBNRM Occasional Paper No 18. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Western Cape.Google Scholar
Roe, D., Nelson, F. & Sandbrook, C., eds (2009) Community management of natural resources in Africa: impacts, experiences and future directions. Natural Resource Issues No. 18. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Rocher, F. & Rouillard, C. (1998) Decentralization, subsidiarity, and neoliberalism in Canada: when the tree hides the forest. Canadian Public Policy-Analyse de Politiques 24: 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito-Jensen, M. & Jensen, C.B. (2010) Rearranging social space boundary-making in a Joint Forest Management project, Andhra Pradesh, India. Conservation and Society (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. & Abdallah, J.M. (2007) Forest diversity, tobacco production and resource management in Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics 9: 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreckenberg, K. & Luttrell, C. (2009) Participatory forest management: a route to poverty reduction? International Forestry Review 11: 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoke, P. (2003) Decentralisation in Africa: goals, dimensions, myths and challenges. Public Administration and Development 23: 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderlin, W., Hatcher, J. & Liddle, M. (2008) From exclusion to ownership? Challenges and opportunities in advancing forest tenure reform. Washington, DC, USA: Rights and Resources Initiative.Google Scholar
Tacconi, L., Siagian, Y., & Syam, R. (2006) On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods, Environmental Management and Development Occasional Papers No. 09. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Topp-Jørgensen, E., Poulsen, M.K., Lund, J.F. & Massao, J.F. (2005) Community-based monitoring of natural resource use and forest quality in montane forests and miombo woodlands in Iringa District, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2653–2677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turyahambwe, N., Geldenhuys, C.J., Watts, S. & Obua, J. (2007) Local organizations and decentralized forest management in Uganda: roles, challenges and policy implications. International Forestry Review 9: 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Benda-Beckmann, K. (1981) Forum shopping and shopping forums: dispute processing in a Minangkabau Village in West Sumatra. Journal of Legal Pluralism 19: 117–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyamana, V. (2009) Participatory forest management in the Eastern Arc mountains of Tanzania: who benefits? International Forestry Review 11: 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardell, D.A. & Lund, C. (2006) Governing access to forests in Northern Ghana: micro-politics and the rents of non-enforcement. World Development 34: 1887–1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, S. (2003) The effects of communal land resource management on forest conservation in northern and north-eastern Namibia. Development Southern Africa 20: 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wily, L.A. (2001) Forest management and democracy in East and Southern Africa: lessons from Tanzania. Gatekeeper Series 95. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Wily, L.A. (no date, c. 2000) Making woodland management more democratic: cases from Eastern and Southern Africa. International Institute for Environment and Development. [www document]. URL http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/9029IIED.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wittayapak, C. & Vandergeest, P., eds (2009) The Politics of Decentralization: Natural Resource Management in Asia. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Mekong Press.Google Scholar
World Bank/WWF Alliance (2002) Forest Law Assessment in Selected African Countries. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Wurster, K. (2010) Does management matter? Assessing the effects of charcoal production and management on woodland regeneration in Senegal. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
Zulu, L.C. (2008) Community forest management in Southern Malawi: solution or part of the problem? Society and Natural Resources 21: 687–703.Google Scholar