Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:01:57.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Cost-evaluation Technique for Restoration of Seagrass and Other Plant Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Mark S. Fonseca ,
W. Judson Kenworthy  and
Ronald C. Phillips
Mark S. Fonseca
Affiliation:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, Beaufort Laboratory, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516, USA.
W. Judson Kenworthy
Affiliation:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, Beaufort Laboratory, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516, USA.
Ronald C. Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Natural and Mathematical Life Sciences, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, Washington 98119, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Coastal habitat loss must be reduced either through conservation or mitigative efforts. Implementation of mitigation depends largely on accurate cost-assessment of the projects that are involved. We centre our discussion here on seagrass transplanting as an exemplary mitigative tool.

The technology of restoring seagrass communities has received increasing attention in recent years. However, the methods used have had varying degrees of success, a largely unknown factor being the cost of the technique that is used.

In this paper is presented a universal format that includes consideration of the essential factors in our costanalysis, such as planning, planting, and monitoring activities, geographic location, tidal influence, labour, and materials (both expendable and non-expendable). Cost per (successfully established) shoot or seed or fruit is recommended as the best indicator of cost effectiveness for a given technique. Incorporation and presentation of this information is urged in future projects to motivate wider application of seagrass and other essential plantcommunity restoration.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1982 , pp. 237 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addy, C.E. (1947). Eelgrass planting guide. Maryland Conservationist, 24, pp. 16–7.Google Scholar
Breedveld, J.F. Van (1975). Transplanting of seagrass with emphasis on the importance of substrate. Florida Mar. Res. Publ., 17, pp. 1–26, illustr.Google Scholar
Churchill, C.A., Cok, A.E. & Riner, M.I. (1978). Stabilization of subtidal sediments by the transplantation of the seagrass Zostera marina L. New York Sea Grant Inst., Albany, New York, USA: NYSSGP-RS-78–15, 48 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Eleuterius, L.N. (1975). Submergent vegetation for bottom stabilization. Pp. 439–56 in Estuarine Research, Vol. 2: Geology and Engineering (Ed. Cronin, E.L.). Academic Press, New York, NY, USA: xiv + 587 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Fonseca, M.S., Kenworthy, W.J., Homziak, J. & Thayer, G.W. (1979). Transplanting of eelgrass and shoalgrass as a potential means of mitigating a recent loss of habitat. Pp. 279–326 in Proc. Sixth Ann. Conf. on the Restoration and Creation of Wetlands. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida, USA: iii + 357 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Goforth, H.W. & Peeling, T.J. (1979). Intertidal and subtidal Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.). Transplant studies in San Diego Bay, California. Pp. 324–56 in Proc. Sixth Ann. Conf. on the Restoration and Creation of Wetlands. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida, USA: iii + 357 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. A., Fuss, C.M. & Hall, J. R. (1971). The transplanting and survival of Turtle-grass, Thalassia testudinum, in Boca Ciega Bay, Florida. Fish. Bull., 69, pp. 273–80, illustr.Google Scholar
Phillips, R.C. (1960). Observations on the ecology and distribution of the Florida seagrasses. Florida St. Bd Cons. Mar. Lab., St Petersburg, Spec. Sci. Rep. No. 4., 72 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Phillips, R.C. (1974). Transplantation of seagrasses with special emphasis on Eelgrass, Zostera marina L. Aquaculture, 4, pp. 161–76, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R.C. (1978). Habitat Development Field Investigations, Port St Joe Seagrass Demonstration Site, Port St Joe, Florida, (Dredged Mat. Res. Prog. Tech. Rep. D-78-33.) U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, USA: 52 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ranwell, D.S., Wyer, D.W., Boorman, L.A., Pizzey, J.M. & Waters, R.J. (1974). Zostera transplants in Norfolk and Suffolk, Great Britain. Aquaculture, 4, pp. 185–98, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riner, M.I. (1976). A Study on Method, Techniques and Growth Characteristics for Transplanted Portions of Eelgrass (Zostera marina). Unpublished MS Thesis, Department of Biology, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, USA: ix + 118 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.)Google Scholar
Robilliard, G.A. & Porter, P.E. (1976). Transplantation of Eelgrass (Zostera marina) in San Diego Bay. Consultation for Naval Undersea Center, San Diego, California, USA: NUC TN 1701, 36 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Thorhaug, A. (1974). Transplantation of the seagrass, Thalassia testudinum Konig. Aquaculture, 4, pp. 177–83, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorhaug, A. & Austin, C.B. (1976). Restoration of seagrass: With economic analysis. Environmental Conservation, 3 (4), pp. 259–67, illustr.Google Scholar