Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:41:15.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conceivable Ecodisasters and the Reykjavik Imperative*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Extract

An ecodisaster is here characterized as ‘any major and widespread misfortune to, or seriously detrimental change operating through, Man's or Nature's habitat—whether or not it is engendered by Man himself, and whether or not it affects him directly’.

From this wide perspective but leaving aside such ‘old favourites’ as world famine and nuclear holocaust, and not yet dealing with population swarming and biotic invasion, are selected the following half-dozen items as being particularly pertinent: (1) Build-up of atmospheric carbon dioxide; (2) Disappearance of more and more of the life-support system; (3) Water shortage and salt build-up with continuing irrigation; (4) Loss of genetic diversity; (5) Increasing complexity of human existence and health-hazards; and (6) The Beirut syndrome of human slaughter.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borgstrom, Georg (in press). Ecological constraints of global food production. In Growth Without Ecodisasters?, Edited by Nicholas Polunin. Macmillan, London & Basingstoke, and Halsted-Wiley, New York: [in press for Autumn 1979].Google Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, John L. (1977). What is an ecodisaster? Environmental Conservation, 4 (1), pp. 66–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, Walter R. (1978). Additional range expansion in Florida of the introduced Walking Catfish. Environmental Conservation, 5 (4), pp. 273–5, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, Walter R. (1979). Continued range expansion in Florida of the Walking Catfish. Environmental Conservation, 6 (1), p. 20, map.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul R. & Holdren, John P. (1975). Eight thousand million people by the year 2010? Environmental Conservation, 2 (4), pp. 243–4.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul R., Ehrlich, Anne H. & Holdren, John P. (1977). Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, California: xv + 1051, illustr.Google Scholar
Flohn, Hermann (in press). Man's increasing impact on climate: Atmospheric processes. In Growth Without Ecodisasters?, Edited by Nicholas Polunin. Macmillan, London & Basingstoke, and Halsted-Wiley, New York: [in press for Autumn 1979].Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (Ed.) (1972). The Environmental Future. Macmillan, London & Basingstoke, and Barnes & Noble, New York: xiv + 660 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (1974). Thoughts on some conceivable ecodisasters. Environmental Conservation, 1 (3), pp. 177–89.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (1976 a). A short selection of conceivable ecodisasters. Pp. 327–34 in Science for Better Environment: Proceedings of the International Congress on the Human Environment (HESC), Kyoto, 1975, published by The Asaki Evening News, C.P.O. Box 555, Tokyo, Japan: xiv + 992 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (as ‘N.P.’) (1976 b). The Beirut Syndrome. Environmental Conservation, 3 (1), p. 2.Google Scholar
Polunin, Nicholas (Ed.) (in press). Growth Without Ecodisasters? Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Environmental Future (2nd ICEF), held in Reykjavik, Iceland, 5–11 June 1977. Edited by Nicholas Polunin. Macmillan, London & Basingstoke, and Halsted-Wiley, New York: [in press for Autumn 1979].Google Scholar
Revelle, Roger R. & Shapero, Donald C. (1978). Energy and climate. Environmental Conservation, 5 (2), pp. 8191.Google Scholar
Vida, Gabor (1978). Genetic diversity and environmental future. Environmental Conservation, 5 (2), pp. 127–32.Google Scholar