Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:57:19.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community perceptions of the Cross River National Park, Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Dr Uwem E. Ite
Dr Uwem E. Ite*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom
*
* Uwem E. Ite Tel: +44 1524 593301, Fax: +44 1524 847099 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

National Parks have become the most widely-used category of protected areas in developing countries, including sub-Saharan Africa. Several studies have shown that local-community support for National Parks is based mainly on perceptions of benefits and costs against the background of social, cultural, political and economic considerations. This paper examines the experience in the Cross River National Park (CRNP) in southeast Nigeria using data collected through rapid rural appraisal techniques, household questionnaire surveys, focus group discussions and guided interviews. The results show that in spite of a high level of community awareness of the need to conserve the forests of the study area, there is a low level of local support for the CRNP forest conservation initiative. Four main factors are identified as the main influences on the support extended to the project, namely: reality and expectations of socio-economic development, the pace of project implementation, the relationship between park staff and communities, and the historical rights of local people to the forest of the study area. The implications of the findings relate to the long-term sustainability of the CRNP as a protected forest area.

Keywords

protected arealocal peoplecommunity supportNigeria
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 351 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. & Grove, R. (eds) (1987) Conservation in Africa: People, Policies and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 355 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1996) Good and bad at game. The Economist 6 July: 105–6.Google Scholar
Atte, O.D. (1994) Lands and forests of Cross River State: A participatory appraisal of rural peoples perceptions and preferences. Cross River. State Forestry Project Working Paper no. 9: Forestry Department Headquarters: Calabar.Google Scholar
Brechin, S.R., West, P.C., Harmon, D. & Kutay, K. (1991) Resident peoples and protected areas: a framework for inquiry. In: Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation, ed. West, P.C. & Brechin, S.R., pp. 5–28. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. (1991) Building community support for protected areas: the case of Tortuguero National Park, Costa Rica. MA Thesis, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA: vii + 184 pp.Google Scholar
Caldecott, J. (1996) Designing Conservation Projects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 312 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldecott, J.O., Oates, J.F. & Ruitenbeek, H.J. (1990) Cross River National Park (Okwangwo Division): Plan for developing the park and its support zone. Godalming: WWF-UK: 108 pp.Google Scholar
Cartwright, J. (1991) Is there hope for conservation in Africa? The Journal of Modern African Studies 29(3): 355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. (1983) Rural Development: Putting the Last First. London: Longman, Scientific and Technical: 246 pp.Google Scholar
Federal Government of Nigeria (1991) Decree 36 – National Parks Decree 1991 Official Gazette No. 4 Vol. 78. Federal Government Printer, Lagos.Google Scholar
Fiallo, E.A. & Jacobson, S.K. (1995) Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 22(3): 241–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, J.D. & Leinbach, T.R. (1996) Focus groups as alternative research practice: experience with transmigrants in Indonesia. Area 28(2): 115–123.Google Scholar
Hales, D. (1989) Changing concepts of National Parks. In: Conservation for the Twenty-first Century. eds. Western, D. & Pearl, M., pp. 139–44. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hannah, L. (1992) African People, African Parks: An Evaluation of Development Initiatives as a Means of Improving Protected Area Conservation in Africa. Washington: USAID/Biodiversity Support Program/Conservation International: 76 pp.Google Scholar
Harcourt, A.H., Pennington, H. & Weber, A.W. (1986) Public attitudes to wildlife and conservation in the Third World. Oryx 20(3): 152–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, A.H., Stewart, K.J. & Inahoro, I.M. (1989) Gorilla quest in Nigeria. Oryx 23(1): 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinen, J.T. (1993) Park-people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: a socio-economic analysis. Environmental Cnservation 20(1): 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmgren, P., Masakha, E.J. & Sjoholm, H. (1994) Not all African land is being degraded: a recent survey of trees on farms in Kenya reveals rapidly increasing forest resources. Ambio 23(7): 390–5.Google Scholar
Hough, J.L. (1988) Obstacles to effective management of conflicts between national parks and surrounding human communities in developing countries. Environmental Conservation 15(2): 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, F. & Thompson, H. (1994) A Review of the Okwangwo Division of the Cross River National Park. Unpublished Final Report, 24th July 1994. Godalming: WWF-UK: 41 pp.Google Scholar
Infield, M. (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 45: 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ite, U.E. (1995) Agriculture and Tropical Forest Conservation in Southeast Nigeria. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge, UK: xv + 329 pp.Google Scholar
Ite, U.E. (1997) Small farmers and forest loss in Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Geographical Journal 163(1): in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (1994) Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: 95 pp.Google Scholar
Lado, C. (1992) Problems of wildlife management and land use in Kenya. Land Use Policy 9(3): 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D., Kaweche, G.B. & Mwenya, A. (1990) Wildlife conservation areas outside protected areas – lessons from and experiment in Zambia. Conservation Biology 4(2): 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, R.G. (1984) Forestry and forest conservation in Nigeria. Commonwealth Forestry Review 63(2): 129–36.Google Scholar
Mkanda, F.X. & Munthali, S.M. (1994) Public attitudes and needs around Kasungu National Park, Malawi. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, W.D., Leonard, N.L., Sariko, H.I. & Gamassa, D.M. (1993) Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biological Conservation 63: 177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J.F., White, D., Gadsby, E.L. & Bisong, P.O. (1990) Conservation of gorillas and other species. Appendix 1. In: Cross River National Park (Okwangwo Division): Plan for developing the park and its support zone, eds. Caldecott, J.O., Oates, J.F. and Ruitenbeek, H.J.. Godalming, UK: World Wildlife Fund, UK. 108 pp.Google Scholar
Wells, M., Brandon, K. & Hannah, L. (1992) People and Parks: Linking Protected Areas Management and Local Communities. Washington: World Bank/WWF/USAID: 99 pp.Google Scholar
Wells, M.P. (1996) The social role of protected areas in the new South Africa. Enviromental Conservation, 23(4): 322–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, D. (1990) Okwangwo Division Species Lists. Appendix 9. In: Cross River National Park (Okwangwo Division): Plan for developing the park and its support zone, eds. Caldecott, J. O., Oates, J.F. and Ruitenbeek, H.J., Godalming, UK: World Wildlife Fund, UK: 108 pp.Google Scholar