Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:25:13.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Coasts Under Stress project: a Canadian case study of interdisciplinary methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2010

ROSEMARY E. OMMER
ROSEMARY E. OMMER*
Affiliation:
History, Social Sciences and Mathematics Building, Room B320, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 2Y2
*
*Correspondence: Dr Rosemary E. Ommer 1203 Beddis Road, Salt Spring Island, British Columbia, CanadaV8K 2C8 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Interdisciplinary research requires scholars to learn by doing, and thus interdisciplinary work will be constantly undergoing development. This paper reviews how a large truly integrated interdisciplinary research team capable of handling complex interdependent social and environmental issues was created, developed and managed. The Canadian Coasts Under Stress bicoastal research project (CUS) constitutes a case study, aimed at providing a detailed analysis of a successful relatively ‘mature’ template for interdisciplinary team research that can be transferred to other teams and other research problems. CUS was created to address coastal social-ecological stress, and it uncovered linkages (‘pathways’) between the main drivers of social-ecological health in both human and environmental communities. In so doing, the team produced a comprehensive new way to understand restructuring and its impact on social-ecological health. In organizational terms, the team was divided into two coastal sub-teams (east and west) and five main research components that were reflected in the team logo as the arms of a seastar. To achieve integration of all components and subcomponents, a methodology for research construction and integration was employed that operated in tandem with the methodologies employed in the various subcomponents. Team members shared their vision of what they wished to achieve and meetings were facilitated in a variety of ways such that cross-fertilization and discussion were ongoing, and team members always knew exactly where their work fitted into the greater whole. In the process, significant student training occurred, and the challenge of equitable publication processes were met such that the output of the team achieved both disciplinary rigour and interdisciplinary understanding.

Keywords

Coasts Under Stress programmefisheries managementinterdisciplinaryshared visionsocial-ecologicalteam research
Type
THEMATIC ISSUE: Interdisciplinary Progress in Environmental Science & Management
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 37 , Issue 4: Thematic section. Interdisciplinary Progress in Environmental Science and Management , December 2010 , pp. 478 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albo, G. & Roberts, C. (1998) The MAI and the world economy. In: Dismantling Democracy: The Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) and Its Impact, ed. Jackson, A. & Sanger, M., pp. 283–318. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.Google Scholar
Beneria, L. & Lind, A. (1995) Engendering International Trade: Concepts, Policy and Action. New York, NY, USA: GSD Working Paper Series No. 5, July, Gender, Science and Development Programme and United Nations Development Fund for Women.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Folke, C. & Colding, J. (2000) Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blasco, F., Aizpuru, M. & Gers, C. (2001) Depletion of the mangroves of continental Asia. Wetland Ecology and Management 9 (3): 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundtland, G., ed. (1987) Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Capistrano, A.D. & Kiker, C.F. (1995) Macro-scale economic influences on tropical forest depletion. Ecological Economics 14 (1): 21–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F.S. III, Trainor, S.F., Huningdon, O., Lovecraft, A., Zavaleta, E., Natcher, D.C., McGuire, A.D., Nelson, J.L., Ray, L., Calef, M., Fresco, N., Huntington, H., Rupp, T.S., DeWilde, L. & Naylor, R.L. (2008) Increasing wildfire in Alaska's Boreal Forest: causes, consequences, and pathways to potential solutions of a wicked problem. Bioscience 58: 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, R.A. (1998) The resource cycle in forestry and fishing. Canadian Geographer 42 (2): 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coward, H., Ommer, R.E. & Pitcher, T.J., eds (2000) Just Fish: Ethics and Canadian Marine Fisheries. St John's, Canada: ISER BooksGoogle Scholar
Dolan, A.H., Taylor, S.M., Neis, B., Eyles, J., Ommer, R., Schneider, D.C. & Montevecchi, W.A. (2005) Restructuring and health in Canadian coastal communities: a social-ecological framework of restructuring and health. EcoHealth 2 (3) 195–208. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-005-6333-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2003) Fisheries Management: 2. The Ecosystem Approach to Management. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries Volume 4 Supplement 2. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Harris, R.P. & Steele, J.H., eds. (2004) Regime shifts in the ocean: reconciling observations and theory. Progress in Oceanography 6 (2–4): special issue.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J. & Hanson, C.E.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. (1993) Uncertainty, resource exploitation and conservation: lessons from history. Science 260: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackenzie, S. & Norcliffe, G. (1997) Restructuring in the Canadian Newsprint Industry. The Canadian Geographer 41 (1): 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, H.-P. & Schumann, H. (1998) The Global Trap: Globalization and the Assault on Democracy and Prosperity. New York, NY, USA: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Motos, L. & Wilson, D.C., eds (2006) The Knowledge Base for Fisheries Management. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Ommer, R. ed. (2002) The Resilient Outport: Ecology, Economy and Society in Rural; Newfoundland. St John's, NL, Canada: ISER BooksGoogle Scholar
Ommer, R. (2004) Nature and community in the global market. In: The Twenty-first Century Confronts its Gods: Globalization, Technology and War, ed. Hawken, D.J., pp. 59–78. New York, NY, USA: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Ommer, R. (2006) Coasts Under Stress: Policy Reflections. St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada: ISER Books.Google Scholar
Ommer, R. & Team, (2007) Coasts Under Stress: Restructuring and Social-Ecological Health. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ommer, R., Perry, I., Cochrane, K. & Cury, P., eds (2010) World Fisheries: a Social-Ecological Analysis. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell (in press).Google Scholar
Petras, J. & Veltmeyer, H. (2003) System in Crisis: The Dynamics of Free Market Capitalism. London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Piore, M. & Sabel, C. (1986) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rapport, D. J., Costanza, R. & McMichael, A.J. (1998) Assessing ecosystem health. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 13: 397–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, P. & Ommer, R., eds (2006) Power and Restructuring: Shaping Canada's Coastal Society and Environment. St John's, NL, Canada: ISER Books.Google Scholar
Starfield, A.M. & Jarre, A. (2010) Interdisciplinary modelling for an ecosystem approach to management in marine social-ecological systems’. In: World Fisheries: a Social-Ecological Perspective, ed. Ommer, R.E., Perry, R.I., Cury, P. & Cochrane, K. (in press). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sumaila, U.R., Boyer, D., Skogan, M.D. & Steinshamn, S.I. (2004) Namibia's Fisheries. Ecological, Economic and Social Aspects. Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tiessen, H., Brklacich, M., Breulmann, G. & Menezes, R.S.C. (2007) Communicating Global Change Science to Society: an Assessment and Case Studies. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar