Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:52:21.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategies for coexistence of GM and non-GM soyfrom import to feed processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2009

Nicolas Gryson ,
Mia Eeckhout ,
Aurélie Trouillier ,
Marianne Le Bail  and
Louis-Georges Soler
Nicolas Gryson
Affiliation:
Laboratory AgriFing, Faculty of Biosciences and Landscape Architecture, University College Ghent, Ghent University Association, Voskenslaan 270, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Laboratory of Cereal and Feed Technology, Faculty of Biosciences and Landscape Architecture, University College Ghent, Ghent University Association, Voskenslaan 270, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Mia Eeckhout
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Cereal and Feed Technology, Faculty of Biosciences and Landscape Architecture, University College Ghent, Ghent University Association, Voskenslaan 270, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Aurélie Trouillier
Affiliation:
INRA-SAE2, Unité ALISS, 65 Boulevard de Brandebourg, 94205 Ivry-sur-Seine, France
Marianne Le Bail
Affiliation:
UMR SADapt, Département Sciences et Ingénierie Agronomiques, Forestières, de l'Eau et de l'Environnement, AgroParisTech, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75631 Paris, France
Louis-Georges Soler
Affiliation:
INRA-SAE2, Unité ALISS, 65 Boulevard de Brandebourg, 94205 Ivry-sur-Seine, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Regulations 1829/2003/CE and 1830/2003/CE have allowed the placing on the European market of GM products in food and feed chains, and have defined their rules of traceability and labeling. For some supply chains, like for soy and its derived products that are used in the production of feed, manufacturers have to face both non-GM and GM production, although there are no labeling requirements for animal products derived from animals fed with GMOs. This study presents the strategies of stakeholders involved in the feed production chain to maintain concurrent production of compound feed with GM and non-GM soy products, by dealing with the coexistence between those two crops. The stakeholders include importers, traders, soy processors, feed processors and retailers. The study shows that many tools are in place to ensure and maintain the current coexistence. However, a profound harmonization of procedures and methods at a European level should be encouraged.

Keywords

GMOcoexistencesegregationRoundup Ready soybeancarry-overfeed chaintraceabilityadmixture
Type
Research Article
Information
Environmental Biosafety Research , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 153 - 159
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2009

References

Commission Recommendation 2003/556/EC of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Off. J. Eur. Communities L 189: 36–47
Devos, Y, Reheul, D, De Schrijver A (2005) The coexistence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 71–87 CrossRef
Gryson, N, Messens, K, Van Laere, D, Eeckhout, M (2007) Co-existence and traceability of GM and non-GM products in the feed chain. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 226: 81–85 CrossRef
ISO 2859. Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes. ISO, Geneva
James C (2006) Preview: Global status of commercialized transgenic crops: 2006. ISAAA Briefs 35, Ithaca, USA
Messéan A, Angevin F, Gómez-Barbero M, Menrad K, Rodríguez-Cerezo E (2006) New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM-crops in European agriculture. European Commission, Directorate General, Joint Research Centre, Technical Report EUR 22102
Oehen B, Costa-Font M, Morgner M, Gil JM, Stolze M (2007) Co-existence in maize supply chains in Spain and Switzerland. Proceedings of the 3rd QLIF Congress, Hohenheim, Germany, March 20–23. http://orgprints.org/10379/
Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Off. J. Eur. Communities L 268: 1–23
Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Off. J. Eur. Communities L 268: 24–28
Shoemaker R, Harwood J, Day-Rubenstein K, Dunahay T, Heisey P, Hoffman L, Klotz-Ingham C, Lin W, Mitchell L, McBride W, Fernandez-Cornejo J (2001) Economic issues in agricultural biotechnology. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Information Bulletin 762. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib762
Van Gelder JW, Dros JM (2002) Corporate actors in the South American soy production chain. A research paper prepared for World Wide Fund for Nature Switzerland. Profundo/AIDEnvironment, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 82 p
Waiblinger H-U, Graf N, Mäde D, Woll K, Busch U, Holland B, Pilsl H, Naeumann G, Reiting R, Ehrentreich B, Schulze M, Tschirdewahn B, Brünen-Nieweler C, Hempel G, Weidner M, Winterstein AR (2007) “Technically unavoidable” in terms of genetically modified organisms – an approach for food control. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2: 126–129