Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:00:35.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plant fitness assessment for wild relatives of insect resistant crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Deborah K. Letourneau
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
Joy A. Hagen
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Risk assessments of new insect-resistant crops will need to estimate the potential for increased weediness of wild crop relatives as a consequence of gene flow. When field experiments are precluded by containment concerns, simulation experiments can identify hazards or measure expected differences between GMOs and parental plants. To measure plant fitness consequences of wild plant protection from Bt-susceptible herbivores, we used topical sprays of bacterial Bacillus thuringiensis larvacide (Bt) on Brassica rapa. Spontaneous crosses between B. rapa and Bt cole crops cannot be precluded, especially if adoption of Bt varieties leads to high exposure. We compared survivorship and seed output of B. rapa that were either protected from or exposed to Bt-susceptible Lepidoptera in the various conditions where hybrids are likely to occur: cultivated (disked) soil, uncultivated agricultural field margins, and nearby non-crop habitats (meadows and ruderal areas). The relative effect of herbivore protection varied among years, habitats, and populations of seedlings. In 2003–2004, Bt sprays did not result in lower herbivory on B. rapa, and plant fitness was not increased. However, in 2004–2006 B. rapa seedlings protected from Bt-susceptible herbivores lived 25% longer, on average, than those that were exposed to these herbivores. In addition, an average B. rapa seedling sprayed with Bt throughout its lifetime was twice as likely to produce siliques and had 251% of the seed output of a seedling exposed to herbivores. The fitness advantage of Bt-based plant protection was apparent in 2004–2005 in half the plants that experienced higher herbivory, and for 2005–2006, was more pronounced in agricultural habitats than in meadows with established, perennial vegetation and less disturbance. Positive effects of Bt-based plant protection and greater fitness in disturbed habitats suggest that crop-wild gene flow may benefit weed populations, and that field tests with herbivore exclusion/addition experiments are feasible alternatives when molecular containment of transgenes restricts field experiments with insect resistant crop-wild hybrids.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2009

References

Allainguillaume, J, Alexander, M, Bullock, JM, Saunders, M, Allender, CJ, King, G, Ford, CS, Wilkinson, MJ (2006) Fitness of hybrids between rapeseed (Brassica napus) and wild Brassica rapa in natural habitats. Mol. Ecol. 15: 11751184 CrossRef
Allison PD (1995) Survival analysis using SAS®: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 292 p
Ammitzboll, H, Mikkelsen, TN, Jorgensen, RB (2005) Transgene expression and fitness of hybrids between GM oilseed rape and Brassica rapa. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 312 CrossRef
Andow, DA, Zwahlen, C (2006) Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecol. Lett. 9: 196214 CrossRef
Clark, EA (2006) Environmental risks of genetic engineering. Euphytica 148: 4760 CrossRef
Colwell, RK, Norse, EA, Pimentel, D, Sharples, FE, Simberloff, D (1985) Genetic engineering in agriculture. Science 229: 111 CrossRef
Darmency, H (1994) The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: Introgression and weediness. Mol. Ecol. 3: 3740. CrossRef
Delannay, X, LaVallee, B, Proksch, R, Fuchs, R, Sims, S, Greenplate, J, Marrone, PG, Dodson, RB, Augustine, JJ, Layton, JG, Fishhoff, D (1989) Field performance of transgenic tomato plants expressing the Bacillus thuringinesis var. kurstaki insect control protein. Bio/technology 7: 12651269
Ellstrand NC (2003) Dangerous liaisons?: when cultivated plants mate with their wild relatives, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Ellstrand, NC, Prentice, HC, Hancock, JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 539563 CrossRef
FitzJohn, RG, Armstrong, TT, Newstrom-Lloyd, LE, Wilton, AD, Cochrane, M (2007) Hybridisation within Brassica and allied genera: evaluation of potential for transgene escape. Euphytica 158: 209230 CrossRef
Gould, F (1988) Evolutionary biology and genetically engineered crops. BioScience 38: 2633 CrossRef
Hails, RS (2000) Genetically modified plants - the debate continues. TREE 15: 1418
Hails, RS, Morley, K (2005) Genes invading new populations: a risk assessment perspective. TREE 20: 245252
Halfhill, MD, Sutherland, JP, Moon, HS, Poppy, GM, Warwick, SI, Weissinger, AK, Rufty, TW, Raymer, PL, Stewart, CN (2005) Growth, productivity, and competitiveness of introgressed weedy Brassica rapa hybrids selected for the presence of Bt cry1Ac and gfp transgenes. Mol. Ecol. 14: 31773189 CrossRef
Hilbeck, A (2001) Implications of transgenic, insecticidal plants for insect and plant biodiversity. Persp. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 4: 4361 CrossRef
Hoffman, CA (1990) Ecological risks of genetic engineering of crop plants: scientific and social analyses are critical to realize benefits of the new techniques. BioScience 40: 434 CrossRef
Jorgensen, RB, Andersen, B (1994) Spontaneous hybridization between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy Brassica campestris (Brassicaceae) - a risk of growing genetically-modified oilseed rape. Am. J. Bot. 81: 16201626 CrossRef
Kareiva, P, Morris, W, Jacobi, CM (1994) Studying and managing the risk of cross-fertilization between transgenic crops and wild relatives. Mol. Ecol. 3: 1521 CrossRef
Letourneau DK, Hagen JA, Robinson GS (2002) Bt-crops: Evaluating benefits under cultivation and risks from escaped transgenes in the wild. In Letourneau DK, Burrows BE, eds, Genetically Engineered Organisms: Assessing Environmental and Human Health Effects, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
Letourneau, DK, Robinson, GS, Hagen, JA (2003) Bt crops: Predicting effects of escaped transgenes on the fitness of wild plants and their herbivores. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 219246 CrossRef
Marvier M, Kareiva P (1999) Extrapolating from field experiments that remove herbivores to population-level effects of herbivore-resistant transgenes. Workshop on Ecological Effects of Pest Resistance Genes in Managed Ecosystems, Information Systems for Biotechnology, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 57–64
Mason, P, Braun, L, Warwick, SI, Zhu, B, Stewart, CN Jr (2003) Transgenic Bt-producing Brassica napus: Plutella plutella selection pressure and fitness of weedy relatives. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 263276 CrossRef
Moon, HS, Halfhill, MD, Good, LL, Raymer, PL, Stewart, CN (2007) Characterization of directly transformed weedy Brassica rapa and introgressed B. rapa with Bt cry1Ac and gfp genes. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 10011010 CrossRef
National Research Council (2002) Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC
Parker, IM, Kareiva, P (1996) Assessing the risks of invasion for genetically engineered plants: Acceptable evidence and reasonable doubt. Biol. Cons. 78: 193203 CrossRef
Ramachandran, S, Buntin, GD, All, JN, Raymer, PL, Stewart, CN (2000) Intraspecific competition of an insect-resistant transgenic canola in seed mixtures. Agron. J. 92: 368374 CrossRef
Randall, JM (1996) Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Tech. 10: 370383
Raybould, A, Cooper, I (2005) Tiered tests to assess the environmental risk of fitness changes in hybrids between transgenic crops and wild relatives: the example of virus resistant Brassica napus. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 127140 CrossRef
Riggin-Bucci, TM, Gould, F (1997) Impact of intraplot mixtures of toxic and nontoxic plants on population dynamics of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and its natural enemies. J. Econ. Ent. 90: 241251 CrossRef
SAS Institute Inc. (2004) SAS V.9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA
Snow, AA, Moran-Palma P (1997) Commercialization of transgenic plants: Potential ecological risks. BioScience 47: 206206 CrossRef
Snow, AA, Pilson, D, Rieseberg, LH, Paulsen, MJ, Pleskac, N, Reagon, MR, Wolf, DE, Selbo, SM (2003) A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecol. Appl. 12: 279286 CrossRef
Snow, AA, Andow, DA, Gepts, P, Hallerman, EM, Power, A, Tiedje, JM, Wolfenbarger, LL (2005) Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations. Ecol. Appl. 15: 377404 CrossRef
Stewart, CN, All, JN, Raymer, PL, Ramachandran, S (1997) Increased fitness of transgenic insecticidal rapeseed under insect selection pressure. Mol. Ecol. 6: 773779 CrossRef
Sutherland, JP, Justinova, L, Poppy, GM (2006) The responses of crop-wild Brassica hybrids to simulated herbivory and interspecific competition: Implications for transgene introgression. Environ. Biosafety Res. 5: 1525 CrossRef
Tabashnik, BE, Cushing, NL, Finson, N, Johnson, MW (1990) Field development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae). J. Econ. Ent. 83: 16711676 CrossRef
Tiedje, JM, Colwell, RK, Grossman, YL, Hodson, RE, Lenski, RE, Mack, RN, Regal, PJ (1989) The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms: ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology 70: 298 CrossRef
Vacher, C, Weiss, AE, Hermann, D, Kossler, T, Young, C, Hochberg, ME (2004) Impact of ecological factors on the initial invasion of Bt transgenes into wild populations of birdseed rape (Brassica rapa). Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 806814 CrossRef
Warwick SI, Stewart CN (2005) Crops come from wild plants – how domestication, transgenes, and linkage together shape ferality. In Gressel J, ed, Crop Ferality and Volunteerism, CRC/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 9–30
Warwick, SI, Simard, MJ, Legere, A, Beckie, HJ, Braun, L, Zhu, B, Mason, P, Seguin-Swartz, G, Stewart, CN (2003) Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 528539 CrossRef
Wolfenbarger, LL, Phifer, PR (2000) The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290: 2088 CrossRef
Zhu, B, Lawrence, JR, Warwick, SI, Mason, P, Braun, L, Halfhill, MD, Stewart, CN Jr (2004) Inheritance of GFP-Bt transgenes from Brassica napus in backcrosses with three wild B. rapa accessions. Environ. Biosafety Res. 3: 4554 CrossRef