Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:05:22.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enumerating lepidopteran species associated with maize as a first step in risk assessment in the USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2004

John E. Losey ,
Ruth A. Hufbauer  and
Robert G. Hartzler
John E. Losey
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Ruth A. Hufbauer
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Robert G. Hartzler
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, IA 50011, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pest management can have substantial impacts on non-target species both within and outside the units being managed. Assessment of these impacts is hampered by the lack of even the most basic checklist of the species present in most systems. The maize agroecosytem is of particular interest because of the large area covered and the intensity of widely varying forms of pest management. In this study a database of lepidopteran species that occur within the maize agroecosystem in the United States was compiled. The process was initiated by developing a list of plants present in maize using published sources and the first-hand knowledge of “weed” experts. This list of plant species associated with maize was then cross-listed with lepidopteran host feeding records using published sources. Finally, phenological profiles and conservation rankings were added. Although our list is not exhaustive, we found 132 plant species in 33 families associated with maize, and 229 lepidopteran species in 21 families that feed on these plants. The database of plants and lepidopteran species can be a starting point for assessment of risk to non-target Lepidoptera in maize from chemical control, biological control, and the use of transgenic Bt maize. The lepidopteran species associated with maize were found to be significantly less imperiled, as measured by their conservation rankings, than lepidopteran species as a whole in all habitats. This finding suggests that rare or endangered lepidopteran species are unlikely to be impacted by pest management in maize. Based on the likely lack of impact of pest management in maize on individual species, future studies should focus on potential impacts on the ecological services that lepidopteran species provide.

Keywords

Bt maizetransgenicGMOnon-target speciesrisk assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
Environmental Biosafety Research , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 2003 , pp. 247 - 261
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2003

References

Biddinger, DJ, Felland, CM, Hull, LA (1994) Parasitism of tufted apple bud moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in conventional insecticide and pheromone-treated Pennsylvania apple orchards. Environ. Entomol. 23: 1568–1579 CrossRef
Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP (1996) The Forgotten Pollinators. Island Press, Washington DC
Cardina, J, Regnier, E, Harrison, K (1991) Long-term tillage effects on seed banks in three Ohio USA soils. Weed Sci. 39: 186–194
Engelhardt GP (1946) The North American Clear-wing Moths of the Family Aegeriidae. Bulletin 190. Smithsonian Institution United States National Museum. Washington DC
Ebner JA (1970) The butterflies of Wisconsin. Board of Trustees, Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI
Economic Research Service – USDA (2002) http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Corn/background.htm;
Foreign Agriculture Service – USDA (2002) http://www.fas.usda.gov/grain/circular/2002/03-02/cgra_tbl.pdf;
Forbes WTM (1969) Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states. Entomological Reprint Specialists. Lansing, MI
Glenn, S, Phillips, WH, Kalnay, P (1997) Long-term control of perennial broadleaf weeds and triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11: 436–440
Hardwick DF (1996) A monograph to the North American Heliothentinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ottawa
Hoffmann, MP, Walker, DL, Shelton, AM (1995) Biology of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) reared on Ostriniae nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and survey for additional hosts. Entomophaga 40: 387–402 CrossRef
Howe WH (1975) The Butterflies of North America. Garden City, New York
Johnson, KS, Scriber, JM, Nitao, JK, Smitley, DR (1995) Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurtstaki to three nontarget Lepidoptera in field studies. Environ. Ent. 24: 288–297 CrossRef
Julien MH, Griffiths MW (1998) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds/compiled and edited by Oxon. 4th edn. CABI Publishers, New York
Klots AB (1979) A Field Guide to the Butterflies: North America, east of the Great Plains. Houghton Mifflin. Boston, MA
National Agricultural Statistics Service – USDA (2000) Crop Production: 1999 Summary
NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application] (2001) Version 1.6. Arlington, Virginia, USA: NatureServe. Available: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: October 3, 2002)
Opler PA (1999) Field guide to western butterflies. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MI
Opler PA, Krizek GO (1984) Butterflies East of the Great Plains: an illustrated natural history. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, MD
Orr DB, Garcia-Salazar C, Landis DA (2000) Trichogramma nontarget impacts: A method for biological control risk assessment. In Follet, Duan, eds, Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer Acad. Publ. pp 111–126
Padgitt M, Newton D, Penn R, Sandretto C (2001) Production Practices for Major Crops in USA Agriculture, 1990-1997. Economic Research Service – USDA
Pavuk, DM, Stinner, BR (1991) New lepidoptera-parasitoid associations in weedy corn plantings: A potential alternate host for Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) parasitoids. The Great Lakes Entomologist 24: 219–223
Peacock, JW, Schweitzer, DF, Carter, JL, Dubois, NR (1998) Laboratory assessment of the effects of Bacillus thuringiensis on native lepidoptera. Environ. Entomol. 27: 450–457 CrossRef
Pyle RM (1992) The Audubon Society field guide to North American butterflies. New York
Richard J, Hietzman JE (1987) Butterflies and moths of Missouri. Missouri Dept. of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO
SAS Institute (1996) SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.12 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
Schweizer, EE, Westra, P, Lydecker, DW (1998) Seedbank and emerged annual weed populations in cornfields (Zea mays) in Colorado. Weed Technol. 12: 243–248
Scott JA (1986) The butterflies of North America: A natural history and field guide. Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Shull EM (1987) Butterflies of Indiana. Indiana Academy of Science, Bloomington, IN
Tietz HM (1972) North American Lepidoptera. (Vols. 1 and 2). Allyn Museum. Sarasota, FL
U.S. Grains Council (2002) http://www.grains.org/grains/corn.html;
Wax LM, Fwacett RS, Isely D (1981) Weeds of the North Central States, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Webster, TM, Cobble, HD (1997) Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol. 11: 308–318
Western D (1989) Conservation without parks: Wildlife in the rural landscape. In Western D, Pearl M, eds, Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 158–165
Wright MG, Hoffmann MP, Kuhar TP, Pitcher SA, Gardner J, Assessing risks of biological control introductions: a probabilistic risk-assessment approach. (unpublished)
Zhang B (1994) Index of economically important Lepidoptera. CAB International, Wallingford http://ipmwww.ncsu.edu/AG271/corn_sorghum/granulate_cutworm.html http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extpubs/plantsci/rowcrops/eb25w-6a.htm http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/distr/lepid/BFLYUSA/bflyusa.htm;