Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:56:04.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wealth and population growth under dynamic average utilitarianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

Rintaro Yamaguchi Open the ORCID record for Rintaro Yamaguchi [Opens in a new window]
Rintaro Yamaguchi*
Affiliation:
Urban Institute, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In wealth accounting and sustainability assessments, we characterize the non-declining wealth criterion under dynamic average utilitarianism (DAU) as defined by Dasgupta (2001). Under DAU, the objective function consists of total intergenerational well-being divided by the present discounted sum of population from the present to the future. It is shown that, in order for an economy to be on a sustainable path, inclusive wealth should grow at a rate higher than the difference between the discount rate and the share of current population of the discounted future population. Our application to the inclusive wealth index shows that, among other results, the DAU criterion changes sustainability assessments for some developing countries with future demographic change, implying that wealth does not accumulate sufficiently in light of DAU. We also show empirical estimates of the value of population change under total utilitarianism, average utilitarianism, and DAU.

Keywords

genuine savingsinclusive wealthpopulation changevalue of populationdynamic average utilitarianismsustainable development
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, KJ, Dasgupta, P and Mäler, K-G (2003) The genuine savings criterion and the value of population, Economic Theory 21(2–3), 217–225.Google Scholar
Arrow, K, Dasgupta, P, Goulder, L et al. (2004) Are we consuming too much?, Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, 147–172.Google Scholar
Arrow, KJ, Dasgupta, P, Goulder, LH, Mumford, KJ and Oleson, K (2012) Sustainability and the measurement of wealth, Environment and Development Economics 17(3), 317–353.Google Scholar
Asheim, GB (2000) Green national accounting: why and how?, Environment and Development Economics 5(1), 25–48.Google Scholar
Asheim, GB (2003) Green national accounting for welfare and sustainability: a taxonomy of assumptions and results, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 50(2), 113–130.Google Scholar
Asheim, GB (2004) Green national accounting with a changing population, Economic Theory 23(3), 601–619.Google Scholar
Asheim, GB and Buchholz, W (2004) A general approach to welfare measurement through national income accounting, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106(2), 361–384.Google Scholar
Asheim, GB and Zuber, S (2014) Escaping the repugnant conclusion: rank-discounted utilitarianism with variable population, Theoretical Economics 9(3), 629–650.Google Scholar
Cairns, RD (2013) Sustainability or the measurement of wealth?, Environment and Development Economics 18(5), 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P (2001) Human Well-being and the Natural Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P and Mäler, K-G (2000) Net national product, wealth, and social well-being, Environment and Development Economics 5, 69–93.Google Scholar
Fenichel, EP and Abbott, JK (2014) Natural capital: from metaphor to measurement, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerland, P, Raftery, AE, Ševčíková, H et al. (2014) World population stabilization unlikely this century, Science 346(6206), 234–237.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K and Clemens, M (1999) Genuine savings rates in developing countries, World Bank Economic Review 13, 333–356.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, JC (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility, Journal of Political Economy 63(4), 309–321.Google Scholar
Marchiori, L and Schumacher, I (2011) When nature rebels: international migration, climate change, and inequality, Journal of Population Economics 24, 569–600.Google Scholar
Parfit, D (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pezzey, JC (2004) One-sided sustainability tests with amenities, and changes in technology, trade and population, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48(1), 613–631.Google Scholar
United Nations Population Division (2013) World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision.Google Scholar
UNU-IHDP and UNEP (2012) Inclusive Wealth Report 2012. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
UNU-IHDP and UNEP (2014) Inclusive Wealth Report 2014. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viscusi, WK and Aldy, JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1), 5–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, ML (1976) On the welfare significance of national product in a dynamic economy, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 90(1), 156–162.Google Scholar
Weitzman, ML (2003) Income, Wealth, and the Maximum Principle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (2012) World Development Indicators 2012. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, R (2014) Inclusive wealth with a changing but aging population, Economics Letters 124(1), 21–25.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, R (2017) Intergenerational discounting with intragenerational inequality in consumption and the environment, Athens: European Association of Environmental and Resources Economists.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, R and Managi, S (2017) New financing for sustainable development: the case for NNP- or inclusive wealth-linked bonds, The Journal of Environment & Development 26(2), 214–239.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, R, Sato, M and Ueta, K (2016) Measuring regional wealth and assessing sustainable development: an application to a disaster-torn region in Japan, Social Indicators Research 129(1), 365–389.Google Scholar
Zuber, S and Asheim, GB (2012) Justifying social discounting: the rank discounted utilitarian approach, Journal of Economic Theory 147, 1572–1601.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Yamaguchi supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Yamaguchi supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 5.6 MB