Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:32:52.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic behaviour and environmental commons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2013

Ariel Dinar  and
Georges Zaccour
Ariel Dinar
Affiliation:
Water Science and Policy Center, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Georges Zaccour
Affiliation:
Game Theory and Management, GERAD, HEC Montréal, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction to the Special Issue
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 18 , Special Issue 1: Strategic behaviour and environmental commons , February 2013 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrett, S. (2001),‘ International cooperation for sale’, European Economic Review 45: 1835–1850.Google Scholar
Caparrós, A. and Péreau, J.-C. (2013),‘ Forming coalitions to negotiate North–South climate agreements’, Environment and Development Economics 18; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000411.Google Scholar
Houba, H., Pham Do, K.H., and Zhu, X. (2013),‘ Saving a river: a joint management approach to the Mekong River Basin’, Environment and Development Economics 18; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000435.Google Scholar
Jentoft, S., McCay, B.J., and Wilson, D.C. (1998),‘ Social theory and fisheries co-management’, Marine Policy 22(4–5): 423–436.Google Scholar
Munro, G.R. (2008), ‘Game theory and the development of resource management policy: the case of international fisheries’, in Dinar, A., Albiac, J. and Sanchez-Soriano, J. (eds), Game Theory and Policy Making in Natural Resources and the Environment, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pavlova, Y. and de Zeeuw, A. (2013),‘ Asymmetries in international environmental agreements’, Environment and Development Economics 18; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000289.Google Scholar
Pevnitskaya, S. and Ryvkin, D. (2013),‘ Environmental context and termination uncertainty in games with a dynamic public bad’, Environment and Development Economics 18; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000423.Google Scholar
Zhosan, D. and Gardner, R. (2013),‘ Problems of the commons: group behavior, cooperation and sanctioning in a two-harbor experiment’, Environment and Development Economics 18; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000381.Google Scholar