Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-6rxlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T03:57:52.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural capital and aggregate income growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2024

Dale T. Manning*
Affiliation:
Baker School and Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
Edward B. Barbier
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Dale T. Manning; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

We explore the theoretical conditions in which natural capital improves explanations of aggregate income growth from factor changes. With positive total factor productivity (TFP) growth, including natural capital better explains growth if natural capital growth rates exceed physical capital growth rates. With negative TFP growth and higher natural capital growth rates, natural capital worsens explanations of growth. Using a comprehensive dataset on natural resource stocks and income shares in GDP, we perform an empirical analysis with 99 countries over three time periods between 2001 and 2015 and find that 41 per cent of country-time periods meet the conditions for improved growth explanation with natural capital. Of these, 59 per cent occur because TFP growth is negative, and physical capital growth exceeds that of natural capital. In these cases, including natural capital simultaneously reduces bias in factor shares and TFP estimates and improves the share of growth explained by changes in factors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arrow, KJ, Dasgupta, P, Goulder, LH, Mumford, KJ and Oleson, K (2012) Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environment and Development Economics 17, 317353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avila, AFD and Evenson, RE (2010) Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: the role of technological capital. In Pingali, PL and Evenson, RE (eds), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, vol. 4. Burlington, The Netherlands: Academic Press, pp. 37693822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badeeb, RA, Lean, HH and Clark, J (2017) The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: a critical literature survey. Resources Policy 51, 123134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, EB (2017) Natural capital and wealth in the 21st century. Eastern Economic Journal 43, 391405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, EB (2019) The concept of natural capital. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 35, 1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J and Spiegel, MM (1994) The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 143173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, N, Schreyer, P and Zipperer, V (2017) Productivity measurement with natural capital. Review of Income and Wealth 63, S7S21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, F (2005) Accounting for cross-country income differences. In Aghion, P and Durlauf, S (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1. Elsevier, pp. 679741.Google Scholar
Caselli, F and Feyrer, J (2007) The marginal product of capital. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, 535568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelli, TJ and Rao, DSP (2005) Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000. Agricultural Economics 32, 115134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P, Managi, S and Kumar, P (2022) The inclusive wealth index and sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science 17, 899903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, RC, Inklaar, R and Timmer, MP (2015) The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review 105, 31503182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, D, Inklaar, R and Diewert, WE (2021) Natural resources and missing inputs in international productivity comparisons. Review of Income and Wealth 67, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallardo-Albarrán, D and Inklaar, R (2021) The role of capital and productivity in accounting for income differences since 1913. Journal of Economic Surveys 35, 952974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, K (2006) Where is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Hamilton, JD and Monteagudo, J (1998) The augmented Solow model and the productivity slowdown. Journal of Monetary Economics 42, 495509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, CT and Klenow, PJ (2010) Development accounting. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2, 207223.Google Scholar
Hulten, CR (2010) Growth accounting. In Hall, B and Rosenberg, N (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2. North-Holland, pp. 9871031.Google Scholar
Kremer, M, Willis, J and You, Y (2022) Converging to convergence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 36, 337412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, GM, Wodon, Q and Carey, K (eds) (2018) The Changing Wealth of Nations 2018: Building a Sustainable Future. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashitew, AA, Ross, ML and Werker, E (2021) What drives successful economic diversification in resource-rich countries? The World Bank Research Observer 36, 164196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Managi, S and Kumar, P (2018) Inclusive Wealth Report 2018. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, NG, Romer, D and Weil, DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, DT, Taylor, JE and Wilen, JE (2018) General equilibrium tragedy of the commons. Environmental and Resource Economics 69, 75101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monge-Naranjo, A, Sánchez, JM and Santaeulalia-Llopis, R (2019) Natural resources and global misallocation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 11, 79126.Google Scholar
Nin-Pratt, A and Yu, B (2008) Developing countries and total factor productivity growth in agriculture: new evidence using a Malmquist Index with constrained implicit shadow prices. Conference papers 331744, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.Google Scholar
Schoellman, T (2012) Education quality and development accounting. The Review of Economic Studies 79, 388417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgill, B (2012) The relationship between factor shares and economic development. Journal of Macroeconomics 34, 10441062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgill, B (2014) Back to the basics: revisiting the development accounting methodology. Journal of Macroeconomics 42, 5268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgill, B and Zuleta, H (2017) Variable factor shares and the index number problem: a generalization. Economics Bulletin 37, 3037.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, F (2011) Natural resources: curse or blessing? Journal of Economic Literature 49, 366420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, AJ (2016) Using natural resources for development: why has it proven so difficult? Journal of Economic Perspectives 30, 161184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollrath, D (2024) The elasticity of aggregate output with respect to capital and labor. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 16, 470504.Google Scholar
World Bank (2018) Building the World Bank's wealth accounts: methods and data. Environment and Natural Resources Global Practice. World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2021) The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zuleta, H (2008) An empirical note on factor shares. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 17, 379390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuleta, H (2012) Variable factor shares, measurement and growth accounting. Economic Letters 114, 9193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuleta, H and Sturgill, B (2015) Getting growth accounting right. Documento CEDE, 2015–29. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2677385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Manning and Barbier supplementary material

Manning and Barbier supplementary material
Download Manning and Barbier supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB