Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:57:35.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multinationals and environmental regulation: are foreign firms harmful?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Evangelina Dardati  and
Meryem Saygili
Evangelina Dardati
Affiliation:
Complex Engineering Systems Institute and Center for Applied Economics, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. Email: [email protected]
Meryem Saygili
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, C3100 Austin, TX 78712, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rise of globalization has directed the attention of economists to the effect of trade and multinational production on the environment. We explore whether multinational firms, frequently the target of environmentalists, are harmful for a host country's environment. We introduce environmental regulation in a two-country model of heterogeneous firms with monopolistic competition. Using plant-level data from Chile, we test the model implications. We find that foreign firms are cleaner than domestic plants even after controlling for productivity that is likely to be negatively correlated with emissions. We also show that increasing the stringency of environmental regulations in a previously unregulated market affects the domestic firms more than the multinationals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 163 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albornoz, F., Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R., and Ercolani, M.G. (2009), ‘In search of environmental spillovers’, World Economy 32(1): 136–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., and Taylor, M.S. (2001), ‘Is free trade good for the environment?’, American Economic Review 91(4): 877–908.Google Scholar
Berman, E. and Bui, L.T.M. (2001), ‘Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries’, Review of Economics and Statistics 83(3): 498–510.Google Scholar
Bustos, P. (2011), ‘Trade liberalization, exports and technology upgrading: evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinean firms’, American Economic Review 101(1): 304–340.Google Scholar
Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R., and Shimamoto, K. (2005), ‘Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50(1): 121–143.Google Scholar
Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R., and Strobl, E. (2008), ‘Multinationals and environmental spillovers: the role of ownership, training and experience’, Ecological Economics 65(3): 538–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskeland, G.S. and Harrison, A.E. (2003), ‘Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis’, Journal of Development Economics 70(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D.C. and Porter, M.E. (2002), ‘Ranking national environmental regulation and performance: a leading indicator of future competitiveness?’, Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002, Chapter 2.1, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esty, D.C. and Porter, M.E. (2005), ‘National environmental performance: an empirical analysis of policy results and determinants’, Environment and Development Economics 10(4): 391–434.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. (2010), ‘US environmental regulation and FDI: evidence from a panel of US-based multinational firms’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(3): 158–189.Google Scholar
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., and Yeaple, S. (2003), ‘Exports versus FDI’, NBER Working Paper No. 9439, National Bureau pf Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., and Yeaple, S. (2004), ‘Exports versus FDI with heterogeneous firms’, American Economic Review 94(1): 300–316.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A., Peterson, S., Portney, P., and Stavins, R. (1995), ‘Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?’, Journal of Economic Literature 33(1): 132–163.Google Scholar
Javorcik, B.S. and Wei, S.J. (2004), ‘Pollution havens and Foreign Direct Investment: dirty secret or popular myth?’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy (Contributions) 3(2): 8.Google Scholar
Keller, W. and Levinson, A. (2002), ‘Pollution abatement costs and Foreign Direct Investment inflows to U.S. States’, Review of Economics and Statistics 84(4): 691–703.Google Scholar
Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A. (2003), ‘Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables’, Review of Economic Studies 70(2): 317–342.Google Scholar
Melitz, M. (2003), ‘The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica 71(6): 1695–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, J.P., Sanchez, J.M., and Katz, R. (2002), ‘A market-based environmental policy experiment in Chile’, Journal of Law and Economics 45(1): 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olley, G.S. and Pakes, A. (1996), ‘The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry’, Econometrica 64(6): 1263–1297.Google Scholar
Ramondo, N. (2009), ‘Foreign plants and industry productivity: evidence from Chile’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111(4): 789–809.Google Scholar
Schreifels, J. (2008), ‘Emission trading in Santiago, Chile: a review of the Emission Offset Program of Supreme Decree No. 4’, Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
The Economist (2008), ‘Greener, not leaner’, September 4.Google Scholar