Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:42:14.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: special issue on the environment, resources and pollution – new challenges for economic development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2020

Inma Martínez-Zarzoso Open the ORCID record for Inma Martínez-Zarzoso [Opens in a new window] ,
Christian Oberst  and
Camélia Turcu
Inma Martínez-Zarzoso*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany Department of Economics, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain INFER e.V. – International Network for Economic Research, www.infer-research.eu, Cologne, Germany
Christian Oberst
Affiliation:
INFER e.V. – International Network for Economic Research, www.infer-research.eu, Cologne, Germany German Economic Institute (IW), Cologne, Germany
Camélia Turcu
Affiliation:
INFER e.V. – International Network for Economic Research, www.infer-research.eu, Cologne, Germany University of Orléans – LEO CNRS, Orléans, France
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This special issue contains a selection of six articles in the field of environmental and resource economics, which were presented in INFER workshops and supported events over the last two years. The topics include the effects of income inequality and freedom of the press on environmental stringency; the trade-environment nexus in China; the behavior of cross-country growth rates with respect to resource abundance and dependence; a stochastic frontier analysis to show that technological change is biased more towards energy rather than labor; how recycling and environmental taxes can affect the imbalances between the availability of and the demand for rare earth elements; and the interaction between demographic features and environmental constraints in Caribbean small island developing states. The papers include three empirical contributions and three methodological approaches, which help to improve our understanding of these topics.

Keywords

Caribbean regionChinaenvironmental policyincome inequalitynatural resourcespollutiontechnological changetransparency

JEL classification

O13: Agriculture • Natural Resources • Energy • Environment • Other Primary Products Q3: Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation Q56: Environment and Development • Environment and Trade • Sustainability • Environmental Accounts and Accounting • Environmental Equity • Population Growth O10: General
Type
Introduction
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 25 , Special Issue 6: The Environment, Resources and Pollution – New Challenges for Economic Development , December 2020 , pp. 529 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ba, BS, Combes-Motel, P and Schwartz, S (2020) Challenging pollution and the balance problem from rare earth extraction: how recycling and environmental taxation matter. Environment and Development Economics 25, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X20000054.Google Scholar
Cassin, L (2020) The effects of migration and pollution on cognitive skills in Caribbean economies: a theoretical analysis. Environment and Development Economics 25, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X20000236.Google Scholar
Clootens, N and Kirat, D (2020) Threshold regressions for the resource curse. Environment and Development Economics 25, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X20000297.Google Scholar
Copeland, BR and Taylor, MS (1994) North-South trade and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 755–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, BR and Taylor, MS (1995) Trade and transboundary pollution. The American Economic Review 85, 716–737.Google Scholar
Copeland, BR and Taylor, MS (2003) Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawsey, J, Rucker, P, Dennis, B and Mooney, C (2018) Trump on climate change: People like myself, we have very high levels of intelligence but we're not necessarily such believers. Washington Post, November 28, 2018. Available at .Google Scholar
Freedom House (2019) Freedom in the World 2019: Democracy in Retreat. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Golev, A, Scott, M, Erskine, PD, Ali, SH and Ballantyne, GR (2014) Rare earths supply chains: current status, constraints and opportunities. Resources Policy 41, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, GM and Krueger, AB (1991) Environmental Impacts of A North American Free Trade Agreement. Technical Report NBER Working Paper No. 3914, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Z, Roseta-Palma, C and Ramalho, JJS (2020) Directed technological change, energy and more: a modern story. Environment and Development Economics 25, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X2000008X.Google Scholar
IEA (2019) World Energy Balances 2019. Paris: International Energy Agency. Available at https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-balances-2019.Google Scholar
Martinez-Zarzoso, I and Philips, J (2020) Freedom of the press, inequality and environmental policy. Environment and Development Economics 25, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X20000339.Google Scholar
Sachs, J and Warner, AM (1995) Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 5398. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Tharoor, I (2019) Bolsonaro, Trump and the nationalists ignoring climate disaster. Washington Post, August 23, 2019. Available at .Google Scholar
Zhang, Y (2020) Free trade and the environment – evidence from Chinese cities. Environment and Development Economics 25.Google Scholar