Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T12:49:45.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Household and local forest impacts of Morocco's argan oil bonanza

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2010

TRAVIS J. LYBBERT ,
NICHOLAS MAGNAN  and
ABDELLAH ABOUDRARE
TRAVIS J. LYBBERT
Affiliation:
Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Email: [email protected]
NICHOLAS MAGNAN
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2033 K Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA
ABDELLAH ABOUDRARE
Affiliation:
Département de Machinisme Agricole, École Nationale d'Agriculture de Meknès, Meknès, Morocco
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morocco's argan oil is now the most expensive edible oil in the world. Growing high-value argan markets have sparked a bonanza of argan activity. NGOs, international and domestic development agencies, and argan oil cooperatives have promoted the win–win aim of simultaneously benefiting locals and the argan forest. We test this win–win claim by surveying households before and after rapid appreciation in argan prices. The argan boom has benefited some rural households. Those well positioned to benefit increased their goat herds more than other households, which bodes poorly for forest impacts, and were more likely to send their girls to secondary school. While locals are keeping their goats out of argan trees during the harvest, they may also be resorting to more aggressive harvesting techniques. The boom has made households vigilant guardians of fruit on their own trees, but has not incited investments in longer term tree and forest health.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 439 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelsen, A. and Wunder, S. (2003), ‘Exploring the Forest – Poverty Link: Key Concepts, Issues and Research Implications’, CIFOR Occasional Paper No.70, Jakarta, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E.M. and Perez, M.R. (2001), ‘Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives?’, Ecological Economics 39 (3): 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benchekroun, F. (1990), Un Systeme Typique D'agroforesterie Au Maroc: L'arganeraie, Séminaire Maghrébin d'Agroforesterie, Jebel Oust, Tunisia.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. (2009), Microeconometrics Using Stata, College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Direction de la Statistique (1999), Enquete Nationale Sur Les Niveaux De Vie Des Menages 1998/99: Premiers Resultats, Rabat, Morocco.Google Scholar
Dove, M.R. (1993), ‘A revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development’, Environmental Conservation 20 (1): 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Aich, A., El Assouli, N., Fathi, A., Morand-Fehr, P., and Bourbouze, A. (2007), ‘Ingestive behavior of goats grazing in the Southwestern Argan (Argania spinosa) forest of Morocco’, Small Ruminant Research 70 (2–3): 248–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobal, J. and Aldana, U. (2003), ‘Are nontimber forest products the antidote to rainforest degradation? Brazil nut extraction in Madre De Dios, Peru’, World Development 31 (11): 1873–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M.I. (1993), ‘Conservation by commercialization’, in Hladik, C.M., Hladik, A., Linares, O.F., Pagezy, H., Semple, A., and Hadley, M. (eds.), Tropical Forests, People and Food: Biocultural Interactions and Applications to Development, Pearl River, N.Y.: Parthenon Pub. Group, pp. 815–822.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. (2004), ‘Household welfare and forest dependence in southern Malawi’, Environment and Development Economics 9 (2): 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugerty, M.K. and Kremer, M. (2004), ‘The Rockefeller Effect’, Poverty Action Lab Paper, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Jodha, N.S. (1986), ‘Common property resources and rural poor in dry regions of India’, Economic and Political Weekly 21: 1169–1181.Google Scholar
Larocca, A. (2007), ‘Liquid Gold in Morocco’, New York Times, November 18, 2007.Google Scholar
Lopez-Feldman, A., Mora, J., and Taylor, J.E. (2007), ‘Does natural resource extraction mitigate poverty and inequality? Evidence from rural Mexico and a Lacandona Rainforest Community’, Environment and Development Economics 12 (2): 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Feldman, A. and Wilen, J.E. (2008), ‘Poverty and spatial dimensions of non-timber forest extraction’, Environment and Development Economics 13 (5): 621–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lybbert, T.J. (2007), ‘Patent disclosure requirements and benefit sharing: a counterfactual case of Morocco's argan oil’, Ecological Economics 64: 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lybbert, T.J., Barrett, C.B., and Narjisse, H. (2002), ‘Market-based conservation and local benefits: the case of argan oil in Morocco’, Ecological Economics 41 (1): 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lybbert, T.J., Barrett, C.B., and Narjisse, H. (2003), ‘Does resource commercialization induce local conservation? A cautionary tale from southwest Morocco’, Society and Natural Resources 17: 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Hirit, O., Benzyane, M., Benchekroun, F., El, S.M. Yousfi, and Bendaanoun, M. (1998), ‘L'arganier: Une Espece Fruitiere-Forestiere a Usages Multiples’, Report for Mardaga, Sprimont, Belgium.Google Scholar
Morton, J. and Voss, G. (1987), ‘The argan tree (argania sideroxylon, sapotaceae), a desert source of edible oil’, Economic Botany 41 (2): 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, R.P. and Hirsch, E. (2000), Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research, Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., and Walker, J. (1994), Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattanayak, S.-K. and Sills, E.-O. (2001), ‘Do tropical forests provide natural insurance? The microeconomics of non-timber forest product collection in the Brazilian Amazon’, Land Economics 77 (4): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, C.M. (1994), Sustainable Harvest of Non-Timber Plant Resources in Tropical Moist Forest: An Ecological Primer, Washington, DC: Biodiversity Support Program.Google Scholar
Reddy, S.R.C. and Chakravarty, S.P. (1999), ‘Forest dependence and income distribution in a subsistence economy: evidence from India’, World Development 27 (7): 1141–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. and Yogo, M. (2005), ‘Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression’, in Andrews, D.W.K., Stock, J.H., and Rothenberg, T.J. (eds.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenburg, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–108.Google Scholar
Witkowski, E.T.F., Lamont, B.B., and Obbens, F.J. (1994), ‘Commercial picking of banksia hookeriana in the wild reduces subsequent shoot, flower and seed production’, Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 508–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunder, S. (2001), ‘Poverty alleviation and tropical forests – what scope for synergies?’, World Development 29 (11): 1817–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar