Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T12:59:36.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Export of environmental goods: India's potential and constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2015

Van Son Nguyen  and
Kaliappa Kalirajan
Van Son Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, School of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Australia E-mail: [email protected]
Kaliappa Kalirajan
Affiliation:
Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. Tel: 61258258, Fax: 61258448. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using data from the period 1996–2010, this paper identifies the nature of constraints that make India, which is one of the emerging environmental goods and services (EGS) exporters, unable to realize its export potential of environmental goods (EG). The empirical results show that the growth of India's exports of EG was negatively affected by ‘behind the border’ constraints such as weak infrastructure and institutions, while the effect of ‘explicit beyond the border’ constraints such as partner countries' tariffs and exchange rates on the exports of EG was relatively small. The reduction of India's trading partners' ‘implicit beyond the border’ constraints such as weak infrastructure and institutions significantly contributed toward India's exports of EG, especially during the period 2005–2010.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 158 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alavi, R. (2007), An Overview of Key Markets, Tariffs and Non-tariff Measures on Asian Exports of Select Environmental Goods, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.E. (1979), ‘A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation’, American Economic Review 69(1): 106–116.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.E. and Wincoop, E.V. (2001), Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balineau, G. and de Melo, J. (2011), ‘Stalemate at the negotiations on environmental goods and services at the Doha Round’, International Working Paper No. 28, Fondation Pour Les Études Et Recherches sur le Développement, Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1997), ‘Is regionalism simply a diversion? Evidence from the evolution of the EC and EFTA’, in Ito, T. and Krueger, A.O. (eds) Regionalism Versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, NBER-EASE Vol. 6, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 141–168.Google Scholar
Bergstrand, J.H. (1989), ‘The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics 71(1): 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BERR (2009), ‘Low carbon and environmental goods and services sector strategy’, draft report prepared for the Department for Business Enterprises and Regulatory Reform (BERR), UK by Innovas Solutions Ltd, [Available at] http://issuu.com/nwda/docs/lcegs-draft-sector-strategy#.Google Scholar
Coelli, T.J. (1996), ‘A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: a computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation’, CEPA Working Paper Vol. 96, No. 7, University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
Cosbey, A. (2011), ‘Trade, sustainable development and a green economy: benefits, challenges and risks’, Paper presented at UN Conference on Sustainable Development, 20–22 June 2012, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
Deardorff, A. (1998), ‘Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world?’, in Frankel, J.A. (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 7–32.Google Scholar
Egger, P. and Pfaffermayr, M. (2003), ‘The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: a three-way model with bilateral interaction effects’, Empirical Economics 28(3): 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, R.C. (2002), ‘Border effects and the gravity equation: consistent methods for estimation’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49(5): 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamwey, R., Hoffmann, U., Vikhlyaev, A. and Vossenaar, R. (2003), ‘Liberalization of international trade in environmental goods and services’, Paper presented at the Sub-regional Brainstorming Workshop on the Trade and Environmental Issues Contained in Paragraphs 31 and 32 of the WTO Doha Ministerial Declaration, 30 July–1 August, Bangkok, UNCTAD Secretariat, Geneva.Google Scholar
JEMU (Joint Environmental Markets Unit) (2002), Market Opportunity Brief, Water, Sewage and Solid Waste Sector Report: South West China, London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Jha, V. (2008), Environmental Priorities and Trade Policy for Environmental Goods: A Reality Check, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalirajan, K. (2008), ‘Gravity model specification and estimation: revisited’, Applied Economics Letters 15(13): 1037–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katti, V. (2005), ‘Environmental goods and services: issues for negotiations for India’, [Available at] http://www.slideshare.net/jannap/environmental-goods-services-india-vijaya-katti.Google Scholar
Khan, I.U. and Kalirajan, K. (2011), ‘The impact of trade costs on exports: an empirical modeling’, Economic Modelling 28(3): 1341–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khatun, F. (2010), Trade Negotiations on Environmental Goods and Services in the LDC Context, New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Lema, R. and Lema, A. (2012), ‘Technology transfer? The rise of China and India in green technology sectors’, Innovation and Development 2(1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, M. (2014), Greening India's Growth: Costs, Valuations and Trade-offs, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matyas, L. (1998), ‘The gravity model: some econometric considerations’, World Economics 21(3): 397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, J. (1995), ‘National borders matter: Canada–US regional trade patterns’, American Economic Review 85(3): 615–623.Google Scholar
Mikic, M. (2010), ‘Trade in climate smart goods: trends and opportunities in Asia and the Pacific’, Paper presented at International Seminar on Outstanding Issues on Services, Trade and Development, 3–5 May 2011, Manila.Google Scholar
Monkelbaan, J. (2011), Trade Preferences for Environmentally Friendly Goods and Services, Geneva: ICTSD Global Platform on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainable Energy, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD/Eurostat (1999), The Environmental Goods and Services Industry: Manual on Data Collection and Analysis, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Sahoo, P., Nataraj, G., and Dash, R.K. (2013), Foreign Direct Investment in South Asia: Policy, Impact, Determinants and Challenges, New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. (2005), ‘Environmental goods: a comparison of the APEC and OECD lists’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2005-4, OECD, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugathan, M. (2013), ‘List of environmental goods: an overview’, Information Note, Environmental Goods and Services Series, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, J. (1962), Shaping the World Economy; Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
World Bank (2007), International Trade and Climate Change: Economic, Legal, and Institutional Perspectives, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
WITS (World Integrated Trade Solution) (2013), Website, [Available at] http://wits.worldbank.org/.Google Scholar