Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:47:30.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The economic potential of payments for ecosystem services in water conservation: a case study in the upper reaches of Shiyang River basin, northwest China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2012

Zeng Tang ,
Yulan Shi ,
Zhibiao Nan  and
Zhongmin Xu
Zeng Tang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730020, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Yulan Shi
Affiliation:
Cold and Arid Regions Environment and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Zhibiao Nan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, PR China. Tel: +86 931 8661047. Fax: +86 931 8910979. Email: [email protected]
Zhongmin Xu
Affiliation:
Cold and Arid Regions Environment and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we conduct an investigation to assess the economic potential of payments for ecosystem services to conserve water through the conversion of land under irrigation into rain-fed land in the upper reaches of the Shiyang River basin, located in northwest China. We use an approach developed by Antle and Valdivia (2006, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 50: 1–15) to estimate the supply of water. The analysis shows that it is theoretically possible to reduce agricultural water consumption and subsequently increase the water supply, which would aid the prevention of environmental degradation in the middle and lower reaches of the Shiyang River basin. In addition to the conservation of water, considerable income would be generated by local farmers, which would help to alleviate poverty. Furthermore, the analysis also suggests that more complete data on ecosystem services rates, transaction costs and other related factors would be of value for achieving a more comprehensive assessment.

Type
Theory and Applications
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 445 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antle, J.M. and Capalbo, S.M. (2001), ‘Econometric-process models for integrated assessment of agricultural production systems’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2): 389–401.Google Scholar
Antle, J.M. and Valdivia, R.O. (2006), ‘Modeling the supply of ecosystem services from agriculture: a minimum data approach’, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 50: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antle, J.M., Capalbo, S.M., Mooney, S., Elliott, E.T., and Paustian, K.H. (2003), ‘Spatial heterogeneity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(2): 231–250.Google Scholar
Antle, J.M., Diagana, B., Stoorvogel, J., and Valdivia, R.O. (2010), ‘Minimum-data analysis of ecosystem service supply in semi-subsistence agricultural systems’, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54: 601–617.Google Scholar
Dinar, A. (2000), The Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., and Wunder, S. (2008), ‘Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues’, Ecological Economics 65(4): 663–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2007), The State of Food and Agriculture: Paying Farmers for Environmental Services, Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Government of Wuwei (2007), The Program of Municipal Water Price Reform in Wuwei, Wuwei, China.Google Scholar
Immerzeel, W., Stoorvogel, J., and Antle, J.M. (2008), ‘Can payments for ecosystem services secure the water tower of Tibet?’ Agricultural Systems 96: 52–63.Google Scholar
Kang, S.Z., Su, J., Shen, Q., Shi, P., and Yang, X. (2004), ‘Strategy for water resources utilization and water-saving agriculture development models in Shiyang River basin’, Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering 15(4): 1–8.Google Scholar
Landell-Mills, N. and Porras, I. (2002), Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and their Impact on the Poor, London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).Google Scholar
Ma, Z.M. (1998), ‘Studies on the effect of limited irrigation on evapotranspiration and yields’, Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology 12: 8–10.Google Scholar
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005), Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Synthesis, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
MWR (Ministry of Water Resources) (2004), Pilot Experiences of Establishing a Water-saving Society in China, Beijing: China Water Press.Google Scholar
Pautsch, G.R., Kurkalova, L.A., Babcock, B.A., and Kling, C.L. (2001), ‘The efficiency of sequestering carbon in agricultural soils’, Contemporary Economic Policy 19: 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruan, L.S. and Xu, F.A. (1996), ‘Studies on the effect of limited irrigation on the evapotranspiration in wheat field’, Research of Agricultural Modernization 17(3): 168–171.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T.R., Tanner, C.B., and Bennett, J.M. (1998), ‘Water-use efficiency in crop production source’, BioScience 34(1): 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, F. (2009), ‘Minimum-data analysis of ecosystem service supply with risk averse decision makers’, Master's thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman.Google Scholar
Statistics Bureau of Tianzhu (2009), Statistical Yearbook of Tianzhu, Tainzhu, China.Google Scholar
Tang, Z., Huang, J.L., and Xu, Z.M. (2010a), ‘Modeling the supply of ecosystem services: a case study in Ganzhou District, Heihe River’, Acta Ecologica Sinica 30(9): 2354–2360.Google Scholar
Tang, Z., Xu, Z.M., Wu, C.F., and Liu, J.G. (2010b), ‘Determination of the eco-compensation criteria: an application in Minqin, Gansu’, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 32(5): 1044–1048.Google Scholar
Tu, X.F., Wang, H.Z., Ding, D.F., and Tang, M.Y. (2010), ‘The economic benefits and the costs of the first stage of the western route of the South-to-North water transfer project’, Yellow River 23(10): 30–31.Google Scholar
Wunder, S. (2005), ‘Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts’, Occasional Paper No. 42, CIFOR, Bogor.Google Scholar
Wunder, S., Engel, S., and Pagiola, S. (2008), ‘Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries’, Ecological Economics 65(4): 834–852.Google Scholar
Yang, Y.Z., Feng, Z.M., Huang, H.Q., and Lin, Y.M. (2008), ‘Climate-induced changes in crop water balance during 1960–2001 in Northwest China’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 127: 107–117.Google Scholar