Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:52:14.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does global titling sustain informal taxation? Evidence from Ecuadorian urban slums

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2018

Georgi Boichev
Georgi Boichev*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Low-income urban neighborhoods in developing countries receive low levels of public services, often not supplemented by community provision due to low rates of informal tax compliance. This paper presents evidence from low-income neighborhoods in Quito, Ecuador using an IV empirical strategy that the global titling of neighborhoods sustains informal taxation. The estimates reveal a sizable average effect of global titling on in-kind labor household that is drawn from a broad base. Evidence is also found which suggests that the possession of a global title provides a neighborhood organisation with tools that deter free-riding behavior even among the individually-titled residents.

Keywords

fiscal capacityglobal titlinginformal taxationlocal public goodsH8K42
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , pp. 721 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barr, A, Dekker, M and Fafchamps, M (2015) The formation of community-based organizations: an analysis of a Quasi-Experiment in Zimbabwe. World Development 66(C), 131–153.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, T, Blume, L and Varian, H (1986) On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics 29(1), 25–49.Google Scholar
Burgwal, G (1995) Struggle of the Poor: Neighbourhood Organization and Clientelist Practice in a Quito Squatter Settlement. Amsterdam: CEDLA.Google Scholar
Carrion, D and Sanchez, J (2003) Urban slums report: the case of Quito, Ecuador. In UN-Habitat (eds), Global Report on Human Settlements 2003, The Challenge of Slums. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Chernozhukov, V and Hansen, C (2006) Instrumental quantile regression inference for structural and treatment effect models. Journal of Econometrics 132, 491–525.Google Scholar
del Pilar Moreno-Sánchez, R and Maldonado, JH (2006) Surviving from garbage: the role of informal waste-pickers in a dynamic model of solid-waste management in developing countries. Environment and Development Economics 11, 371–391.Google Scholar
Do, QT and Iyer, L (2008) Land titling and rural transition in Vietnam. Economic Development and Cultural Change 56(3), 531–579.Google Scholar
Dosh, P (2010) Demanding the Land: Urban Popular Movements in Peru and Ecuador, 1990–2005. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Ediguias, NG (1999) Guya informative de Quito: mapas y planos. New York City, NY, USA: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Field, E (2004) Property rights, community public goods, and household time allocation in urban squatter communities: evidence from Peru. William & Mary Law Review 45(3), 837–887.Google Scholar
Field, E (2005) Property rights and investment in urban slums. Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2–3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Field, E (2007) Entitled to work: urban property rights and labor supply in Peru. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(4), 1561–1602.Google Scholar
Field, E and Torrero, M (2006) Do Property Titles Increase Credit Access Among the Urban Poor? Evidence from a Nationwide Titling Program. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Galiani, S and Schargrodsky, E (2010) Property rights for the poor: effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economics 94(9–10), 700–729.Google Scholar
Gandelman, N (2016) Inter-generational effects of titling programmes: physical vs. human capital. The Journal of Development Studies 52(3), 331–342.Google Scholar
Google Maps (2014) Quito, Ecuador. Map.Google Scholar
Green, A and Moser, C (2013) Do property rights institutions matter at the local level? Evidence from Madagascar. The Journal of Development Studies 49(1), 95–109.Google Scholar
Hammond, F (2008) Marginal benefits of land policies in Ghana. Journal of Property Research 25(4), 343–362.Google Scholar
Instituto Geográfico Militar (1992) Atlas infográfico de Quito: socio-dynámica del espacio y política urbana. Ediguías C. Ltda., Quito, Ecuador.Google Scholar
Instituto Geográfico Militar (2002) Atlas infográfico de Quito: socio-dynámica del espacio y política urbana. Ediguías C. Ltda., Quito, Ecuador.Google Scholar
iTouchMap (2014) Quito, Ecuador. Map.Google Scholar
Kinnaman, TC (2009) The economics of municipal solid waste management. Waste Management 29(10), 2615–2617.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, JO and Levy, PI (2002) Untitled: a study of formal and informal property rights in urban Ecuador. The Economic Journal 112(482), 986–1019.Google Scholar
Marx, B, Stoker, T and Suri, T (2013) The economics of slums in the developing world. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(4), 187–210.Google Scholar
Miguel, E and Gugerty, M (2005) Ethnic diversity, social sanctions and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics 89(11–12), 2325–2368.Google Scholar
Murray, MP (2006) Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of the Economic Perspectives 20(4), 111–132.Google Scholar
Njoh, AJ (2003) Self-Help Water Supply in Cameroon –Lessons on Community Participation in Public Works Projects. New York City, NY, USA: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Olken, BA (2006) Corruption and the costs of redistribution: micro evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Public Economics 90(4–5), 853–870.Google Scholar
Olken, BA and Singhal, M (2011) Informal taxation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3(4), 1–28.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E (1990) Governing the Commons. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palaniswamy, N and Krishnan, N (2012) Local politics, political institutions, and public resource allocation. Economic Development and Cultural Change 60(3), 449–473.Google Scholar
Rao, V (2005) Symbolic public goods and the coordination of collective action: a comparison of local development in India and Indonesia. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series 3685.Google Scholar
Rathi, S (2007) Optimization model for integrated municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. Environment and Development Economics 12(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
Roland, G (2000) Transitions and Economics: Politics, Markets and Firms. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roseman, SR (1996) ‘How we built the road’: the politics of memory in rural Galicia. American Ethnologist 23(4), 836–860.Google Scholar
Simelane, H (2016) Urban land management and its discontents: a case study of the Swaziland urban development project (SUDP). The Journal of Development Studies 52(6), 797–812.Google Scholar
UN (2000) State of the environment in Asia and the Pacific 2000. New York, USA: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNCHS (Habitat) (2001) The State of the World's Cities 2001. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Publications Unit.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2003) The Challenge of Slums: Global Report on Human Settlements. Sterling, VA, USA: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Warr, P, Menon, J and Rasphone, S (2015) Public services and the poor in Laos. World Development 66(C), 371–382.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Boichev supplementary material

Boichev supplementary material 1

Download Boichev supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 101.3 KB