Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:52:09.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commons as insurance: safety nets or poverty traps?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

PHILIPPE DELACOTE
PHILIPPE DELACOTE*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 356 Économie Forestière, F-54 000 Nancy, FranceAgroparistech, Engref, Laboratoire d'économie forestière, F-54 000 Nancy, FranceBeta, BETA-CNRS, Université de Nancy, Faculté de Droit Economie et Gestion, F-54 000 Nancy, France. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common property resources are often used by households of developing countries as insurance in case of economic stress. The aim of this paper is to consider the potential poverty-trap implications of this use. If the capacity of the resource is low, or if the population in need of insurance is too large, the households are trapped in CPR extraction activity and cannot get more than their subsistence requirement. In this context, cooperation between households and the introduction of a cooperative insurance mechanism may sustain an equilibrium outside the poverty trap and relax pressure on the resource. Moreover, private insurance schemes could also be a potential solution to this poverty trap.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 305 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, B. (1991), ‘Social security and the family: coping with seasonnality and calamity in rural India’, in Ahmad, E.J.Dreze, J., Hills, J., and Sen, A. (eds.), Social Security in Developing Countries, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 171–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C., Locker, L., and Nugent, R. (2002), ‘Microcredit, social capital, and common pool resources’, World Development 30 (1): 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelsen, A., Sunderlin, W., Ahmad Dermawan, D., and Rianto, E. (2001), ‘Economic crisis, small farmer well-being, and forest cover change in Indonesia’, World Development 29 (5).Google Scholar
Angelsen, A. and Wunder, S. (2002), ‘Exploring the forest-poverty link’, CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 40.Google Scholar
Azariadis, C. and Stachurski, J. (2005), ‘Poverty traps’, in Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Elsevier, pp. 295–384.Google Scholar
Baland, J. and Francois, P. (2005), ‘Commons as insurance and the welfare impact of privatization’, Journal of Public Economics 89 (2–3): 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D. and Chavas, J. (1989), ‘On risk, transactions and economic development in the semiarid tropics’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 37: 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das Gupta, M. (1987), ‘Informal security mechanisms and population retention in rural India’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 36 (1): 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Maler, K. (1993), ‘Poverty, institutions and the environmental resource base’, Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 3, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delacote, P. (2007), ‘Agricultural expansion, forest products as safety nets and deforestation’, Environment and Development Economics 12 (2): 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godoy, R., O'Neill, K., Groff, S., Kostishack, P., Cubas, A., Demmer, J., McSweeney, K., Overman, J., Wilkie, D., Brokaw, N. and Martinez, M. (1997), ‘Household determinants of deforestation by Amerindians in Honduras’, World Development 25 (6): 977–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodha, N. (1986), ‘Common property resources and rural poor in dry regions of India’, Economic and Political Weekly 21 (27): 1169–1182.Google Scholar
McSweeney, K. (2003), ‘Tropical forests as safety nets? The relative importance of forest product sale as smallholder insurance, Eastern Honduras’, Society and Natural Resources 17 (1): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSweeney, K. (2005), ‘Natural insurance, forest access, and compounded misfortune: forest resources in smallholder coping strategies before and after Hurricane Mitch, Northeastern Honduras’, World Development 33 (9): 1453–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, R. and Hirsch, E. (2000), ‘Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: a review’, Technical report, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia and FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, S. and Sills, E. (2001), ‘Do tropical forests provide natural insurance? The microeconommics of non-timber forest product collection in the Brazilian Amazon’, Land Economics 77 (4): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, S. and Chakravaty, S. (1999), ‘Forest dependence and income distribution in a subsistence economy’, World Development 27 (7): 1141–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunder, S. (2001), ‘Poverty alleviation and tropical forests: what scope for synergies?’, World Development 29 (11): 1817–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar