Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:31:18.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of water connections in Central American cities: a revealed preference study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

CÉLINE NAUGES ,
JON STRAND  and
IAN WALKER
CÉLINE NAUGES*
Affiliation:
Toulouse School of Economics, LERNA-INRA, Manufacture des Tabacs, 21 Allée de Brienne, 31000 Toulouse, France. Tel: +33 5 61 12 85 17. Fax: +33 5 61 12 85 20. Email: [email protected].
JON STRAND
Affiliation:
Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund
IAN WALKER
Affiliation:
The World Bank
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We estimate annualized values of access to home tap water in three cities in El Salvador, and marginal ‘barrios’ in four Guatemalan cities, using a hedonic price method for studying changes in capitalized home values from obtaining a water connection. A tap water connection is found to add from 10 per cent to 52 per cent to sales values of homes in our sample. The estimated mean values of gaining tap water access represent 1–5 per cent of real household income, differing by city and with generally higher values in El Salvador. On average this gain eliminates between 1 per cent and 3 per cent of the initial difference in real incomes between the groups of connected and unconnected households. We also find large differences in the value of a tap connection depending on the main source of non-tap water, with lowest values when the source is a private well in El Salvador.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 349 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateman, I.J., Day, B., Lake, I., and Lovett, A.A. (2000), ‘The effect of road traffic on residential property values: a literature review and hedonic pricing study’, Report to The Scottish Office, Development Department, Edinburgh, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
Boyle, K.J., Poor, J., and Taylor, L. (1999), ‘Estimating the demand for protecting freshwater lakes from eutrophication’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 1118–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, R., Daniere, A., and Harwood, S. (1997), ‘The contributions of environmental amenities to low-income housing: a comparative study of Bangkok and Jakarta’, Urban Studies 24: 1495–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniere, A. (1994), ‘Estimating willingness to pay for housing attributes: an application to Cairo and Manila’, Regional Science and Urban Economics 24: 577–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J.G. (1993), Estimation and Inference in Econometrics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Day, B. (2001), ‘The theory of hedonic markets: obtaining welfare measures for changes in environmental quality using hedonic market data’, Economics for the Environment Consultancy (Eftec), London.Google Scholar
Epple, D. (1987), ‘Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products’, The Journal of Political Economy 95: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estache, A., Foster, V., and Wodon, Q. (2002), Accounting for Poverty in Infrastructure Reform, WBI Development Studies, Washington, DC:The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, A.M. (1993), The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. (1997). Econometric Analysis, Third Edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hall, A.R., Rudebusch, G.D., and Wilcox, D.W. (1996), ‘Judging instrument relevance in instrumental variables estimation’, International Economic Review 37: 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiwanji, M. (2000), ‘The demand for water in developing countries’, M. Sc. Dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Kmenta, J. (1986), Elements of Econometrics, Second Edition, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Komives, K. (2003), ‘Infrastructure, property values, and housing choice: an application of property value models in the developing country context’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Department of City and Regional Planning.Google Scholar
Lake, I., Lovett, A., Bateman, I.J., and Langford, I.H. (1998), ‘Modelling environmental influences on property prices in an urban environment’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 22: 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, J.H. and Griffin, C.C. (1993), ‘Water source as a housing characteristic: hedonic property valuation and willingness to pay for water’, Water Resources Research 29: 1923–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, R.B. (1991), ‘Hedonic methods’, in Braden, J.B. and Kolstad, C.D. (eds), Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality: Contributions to Economic Analysis, Amsterdam: North-Holland, chapter IV.Google Scholar
Palmquist, R.B. (2000), ‘Hedonic methods’, in Mäler, K.G. (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. (1974), ‘Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in perfect competition’, Journal of Political Economy 82: 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, J. and Vågnes, M. (2001), ‘The relationship between property values and railroad proximity: a study based on hedonic prices and real estate brokers’ appraisals’, Transportation 28: 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, J. and Walker, I. (2003), ‘The pricing and allocation of water in Central America: analysis of metered and coping water demand in 17 Central American cities’, Report to the Inter-American Development Bank, University of Oslo/ESA Consultores.Google Scholar
Strand, J. and Walker, I. (2005), ‘Water markets and demand in Central America: results based on household sample surveys from 17 cities’, Environment and Development Economics 10: 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. (2003), ‘The hedonic method’, in Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J. and Brown, T.C. (eds), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Doordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 331–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yusuf, A.A. and Koundouri, P. (2005), ‘Willingness to pay for water and location bias in hedonic price analysis: evidence from the Indonesian housing market’, Environment and Development Economics 10: 821–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar