Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:30:11.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uncertainty and the double dividend hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

EFTICHIOS S. SARTZETAKIS
Affiliation:
Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Macedonia, 156 Egnatia Str., Thessaloniki 54006, Greece. Email: [email protected].
PANAGIOTIS D. TSIGARIS
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Thompson Rivers University

Abstract

This paper examines the double dividend hypothesis in the presence of labour income uncertainty. Empirical evidence shows that uncertainty over labour income is particularly significant in developing, while not negligible in developed countries. Under uncertainty, and assuming incomplete capital markets, the tax system plays a role in providing social insurance, and a green tax reform influences its effectiveness. We show that the increase in environmental tax reduces consumption risk, while the balanced budget decrease in labour income tax increases income risk. We find that the total welfare effect of a green tax reform differs substantially from the case of certainty. The critical parameters determining the existence of a second dividend are the lump-sum transfers, the relative substitutability of the two goods for leisure, and the initial tax rates relative to their optimal that determine also the response of labour supply to a change in the tax mix.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K.J. (1971), ‘Insurance, risk and resource allocation’, in Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Ballard, C.L. and Fullerton, D. (1992), ‘Distortionary taxes and the provision of public goods’, Journal of Economics Perspectives 6: 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, C.L., Goddeeris, J.H., and Kim, S.-K. (2005), ‘Non-homothetic preferences and the non-environmental effects of environmental taxes’, International Tax and Public Finance 12: 115130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, R.M. and Zolt, E.R. (2005), ‘The limited role of the personal income tax in developing countries’, Journal of Asian Economics 16: 928946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluffstone, R.A. (2003), ‘Environmental taxes in developing and transition economies’, Public Finance and Management 3: 143175.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, L. (1999), ‘Green tax reforms and the double dividend: an updated reader's guide’, International Tax and Public Finance 6: 421443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, L. and Goulder, L.H. (1996), ‘Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general equilibrium analysis’, American Economic Review 86: 9851000.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, L. and De Mooij, R.A. (1994), ‘Environmental levies and distortionary taxes’, American Economic Review 84: 10851089.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, L. and De Mooij, R.A. (1997), ‘Environmental levies and distortionary taxation: reply’, American Economic Review 87: 252253.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, L. and van der Ploeg, F. (1998), ‘Consequences of environmental tax reform for unemployment and welfare’, Environmental and Resource Economics 12: 137150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, R. and Looney, A. (2006), ‘Consumption smoothing and the welfare consequences of social insurance in developing economies’, Journal of Public Economics 90: 23512356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrsitiansen, V. (1996), ‘Green taxes: a note on the double dividend and the optimum tax rate’, CES working paper, No. 107, University of Munich.Google Scholar
Dalby, B. (1998), ‘Progressive taxation and the social marginal cost of public funds’, Journal of Public Economics 67: 105122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mooij, R.A. (2000), Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend, Baltimore: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J. and Rosen, H.S. (1980a), ‘Labor supply, uncertainty and efficient taxation’, Journal of Public Economics 14: 365374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J. and Rosen, H.S. (1980b), ‘Optimal redistributive taxation and uncertainty’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 95: 357364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floden, M. (2006), ‘Labour supply and saving under uncertainty’, The Economic Journal 116: 721737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullerton, D. (1997), ‘Environmental levies and distortionary taxation: comment’, American Economic Review 87: 245251.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.H. and Varian, H.R. (1988), ‘Intergenerational risk sharing’, Journal of Public Economics 37: 185202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, L.G. (1995), ‘Environmental taxation and the double dividend: a reader's guide’, International Tax and Public Finance 2: 157183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, L.G. (1996), ‘Efficiency impact of pollution taxes, quotas and permits: the importance of pre-existing market distortions’, in Schwab, R. (ed.), Environmental Economics and Public policy: Essays in Honour of Wallace E. Oates, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Goulder, L.G., Parry, I., and Burtaw, D. (1997), ‘Revenue raising vs. other approaches to environmental protection: the critical significance of pre-existing tax distortions’, RAND Journal of Economics 28: 708731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J.A. (1985), ‘Taxes and labor supply’, in Auerbach, A.J. and Feldstein, M.S. (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 213263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S.-R. (2002), ‘Optimal environmental regulation in the presence of other taxes: the role of non-separable preferences and technology’, Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 1: 10251025.Google Scholar
Koskela, E., Schob, R., and Sinn, H.-W. (1998), ‘Pollution, factor taxation, and unemployment’, International Tax and Public Finance 5: 379396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskela, E. and Schob, R. (1999), ‘Alleviating unemployment: the case for green tax reforms’, European Economic Review 43: 17231746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, R. (2006), ‘Happiness and public policy: a challenge to the profession’, The Economic Journal 116: C2433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, H. (2005), ‘Self-insurance in a life-cycle model of labor supply and savings’, Review of Economic Dynamics 8: 945975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundholm, M.L. (1992), ‘Efficient taxation under wage uncertainty’, Public Finance 47: 248256.Google Scholar
Menezes, C.F. and Wang, X.H. (2005), ‘Duality and the Slutsky income and substitution effects of increases in wage rate uncertainty’, Oxford Economic Papers 57: 545557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffit, R. (1992), ‘Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: a review’, Journal of Economic Literature 30: 161.Google Scholar
Morduch, J. (1999a), ‘Between the state and the market: Can informal insurance patch the safety net?’, The World Bank Research Observer 14: 187207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morduch, J. (1999b), ‘The role of subsides in microfinance: evidence from the Grameen Bank’, Journal of Development Economics 60: 229248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morduch, J. (2006), ‘Micro-insurance: the next revolution?’, in Banerjee, A. V., Benabou, R., and Mookherjee, D. (eds.), Understanding Poverty, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ng, Y.K. (1980), ‘Optimal corrective taxes or subsidies when revenue raising imposes an excess burden’, American Economic Review 70: 744751.Google Scholar
Oates, W.E. (1993), ‘Pollution charges as a source of public revenues’, in Giersch, H. (ed.), Economic Progress and Environmental Concerns, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Oates, W.E. (1995), ‘Green taxes: can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same time?’, Southern Economic Journal 61: 914922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormiston, M.B. and Schlee, E.E. (1994), ‘Wage uncertainty and competitive equilibrium in labour markets’, Economica 61: 137145.Google Scholar
Parker, S.C., Belghitar, Y., and Barmby, T. (2005), ‘Wage uncertainty and the labour supply of self-employed workers’, The Economic Journal 115: 190207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, I. (1995), ‘Pollution taxes and revenue recycling’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: S64S77.Google Scholar
Parry, I. (1996), ‘Environmental taxes and quota in the presence of distorting taxes in factor markets’, Resource and Energy Economics 19: 203220.Google Scholar
Parry, I. (2003), ‘Fiscal interactions and the case for carbon taxes over grandfathered carbon permits’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19: 385399.Google Scholar
Pearce, D.W. (1991), ‘The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming’, Economic Journal 101: 938948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repetto, R., Dower, R.C., Jenkins, R., and Geoghegan, J. (1992), ‘Green fees: how a tax shift can work for the environment and the economy’, Working Paper, Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1975), ‘Optimal taxation in the presence of externalities’, Swedish Journal of Economics 77: 8698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1998), ‘Redistribution and the marginal cost of public funds’, Journal of Public Economics 70: 365382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, K. (1997), ‘Involuntary unemployment and environmental policy: the double dividend hypothesis’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 99: 4559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J. and Repetto, R. (1997), ‘Nonseparable utility and the double dividend debate’, Working Paper, World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Townsend, R. (1994), ‘Risk and insurance in village India’, Econometrica 62: 539591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, R. (1995), ‘Consumption insurance: an evaluation of risk-bearing systems in low income economies’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 83102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tressler, J.H. and Menezes, C.F. (1980), ‘Labour supply and wage rate uncertainty’, Journal of Economic Theory 23: 425436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H.R. (1980), ‘Redistributive taxation as social insurance’, Journal of Public Economics 31: 237251.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.D. (1991), ‘Optimal public good provision with limited lump-sum taxation’, American Economic Review 81: 153166.Google Scholar