Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:28:33.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy reform of emission taxes and environmental research and development incentives in an international Cournot model with product differentiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2013

Luis Gautier
Luis Gautier*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75799, USA. Tel:+ 1 (903) 565-5789. Fax:+ 1 (903) 566-5537. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies multilateral and unilateral policy reforms of environmental R&D subsidies and emission taxes in a two-country Cournot model with oligopolistic interdependence. The analysis indicates, inter alia, that there is a potential family of multilateral and unilateral policy reforms which can be set by pollution-intensive and pollution-moderate countries to reduce global emissions. In particular, the analysis suggests that a unilateral increase in the subsidy in the pollution-moderate country may reduce global emissions. The multilateral policy reform of the subsidy and tax in the pollution-intensive country can also reduce global emissions and increase welfare under certain conditions. The role of product differentiation in the context of policy reform is also examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , August 2014 , pp. 440 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amacher, G.S. and Malik, A.S. (2002), ‘Pollution taxes when firms choose technology’, Southern Economic Journal 68(4): 891–906.Google Scholar
Bansal, S. and Gangopadhyay, S. (2003), ‘Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(2): 333–355.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. (2006), ‘Climate treaties and “breakthrough” technologies’, American Economic Review 96(2): 22–25.Google Scholar
Belleflamme, P. and Vergari, C. (2011), ‘Incentives to innovate in oligopolies’, The Manchester School 79(1): 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, F. (2000), ‘Environmental taxation and strategic commitment in duopoly models’, Environmental & Resource Economics 15(3): 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espínola-Arredondo, A. and Zhao, H. (2012), ‘Environmental policy in a linear city model of product differentiation’, Environment and Development Economics 17(4): 461–477.Google Scholar
Fischer, C., Parry, I.W.H., and William, A.P. (2003), ‘Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(3): 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, K. (2009), ‘Environmental policies in a differentiated oligopoly revisited’, Resource and Energy Economics 31(3): 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, L. (2013), ‘Multilateral policy reform of emission taxes and abatement subsidies in a two-country model with oligopolistic interdependence’, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 15(1): 59–71.Google Scholar
Global Energy Statistical Yearbook, [Available at] http://yearbook.enerdata.net/CO2-intensity-data.html.Google Scholar
Hatzipanayotou, P., Lahiri, S., and Michael, M.S. (2005), ‘Reforms of environmental policies in the presence of cross-border pollution and public-private clean-up’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 107(2): 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoel, M. (1991), ‘Global environmental problems: the effects of unilateral actions taken by one country’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20(1): 55–70.Google Scholar
Hoel, M. and de Zeeuw, A. (2010), ‘Can a focus on breakthrough technologies improve the performance of international environmental agreements?’, Environmental & Resource Economics 47(3): 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsoulacos, Y. and Xepapadeas, A. (1996), ‘Emission taxes and market structure’, in Carraro, C., Katsoulacos, Y. and Xepapadeas, A. (eds), Environmental Policy and Market Structure, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayalica, M.Ö. and Lahiri, S. (2005), ‘Strategic environmental policies in the presence of foreign direct investment’, Environmental & Resource Economics 30(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, S. and Symeonidis, G. (2007), ‘Piecemeal multilateral environmental policy reforms under asymmetric oligopoly’, Journal of Public Economic Theory 9(5): 885–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinty, M. and de Vries, F.P. (2009), ‘Technology diffusion, product differentiation and environmental subsidies’, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy 9(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Montero, P. (2002a), ‘Permits, standards, and technology innovation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, P. (2002b), ‘Market structure and environmental innovation’, Journal of Applied Economics 5(2): 293–325.Google Scholar
Olmstead, S.M. and Stavins, R.N. (2012), ‘Three key elements of a post-2012 international climate policy architecture’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 6(1): 65–85.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ibeas, R. (2006), ‘Environmental product differentiation and environmental awareness’, Environmental & Resource Economics 36(2): 237–254.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2006), Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, London: UK Treasury.Google Scholar
Symeonidis, G. (2003), ‘Comparing Cournot and Bertrand equilibria in a differentiated duopoly with product R&D’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Turunen-Red, A. and Woodland, A.D. (2004), ‘Multilateral reforms on trade and environmental policy’, Review of International Economics 12(3): 321–336.Google Scholar
Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. (1996), ‘Trade, strategic innovation and strategic environmental policy – a general analysis’, in Carraro, C., Katsoulacos, Y. and Xepapadeas, A. (eds), Environmental Policy and Market Structure, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 181–208.Google Scholar
Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. (2007), ‘Climate change-environmental and technology policies in a strategic context’, Environmental & Resource Economics 37(1): 159–180.Google Scholar
US Department of Commerce (2010), ‘U.S. carbon dioxide emissions intensities over time: a detailed accounting of industries, government and households’, Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration, April.Google Scholar