Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:09:19.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pesticide use in Brazil in the era of agroindustrialization and globalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2001

Susmita Dasgupta
Affiliation:
Development Economics Research Group, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433
Nlandu Mamingi
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of the West Indies, P.O. Box 64, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados, West Indies.
Craig Meisner
Affiliation:
Development Economics Research Group, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433

Abstract

This study examines the trend in pesticide use in Brazil in the 1990s in the context of agroindustrialization and globalization (trade liberalization). It also seeks to document the environmental costs and human health hazard associated with pesticide use in Brazil. Results from time series data indicate that agricultural trade liberalization has led to increased pesticide use in Brazil, particularly in export crops. Results from cross-section municipality-level data point to higher incidence of pesticide use in municipalities with high income, higher levels of education, large-size farms, predominance of export crops, and with high prevalence of sharecropping. Finally, the study finds that Brazil's agricultural growth in the era of trade liberalization has been clouded by serious human health problems and environmental damage caused by pesticide use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to acknowledge the work of IBGE, Brazil for collaboration and support. Our thanks to Ken Chomitz, Subhendu Roy, Scott Swinton, David Wheeler, anonymous referees, the editor, Guilherme Bastos Soria, Christian Pieri and Michael Howard for the many useful comments and suggestions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent.