Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:28:57.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Income and environmental R&D: empirical evidence from OECD countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2001

MARINUS H.C. KOMEN ,
SHELBY GERKING  and
HENK FOLMER
MARINUS H.C. KOMEN
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Policy, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
SHELBY GERKING
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA
HENK FOLMER
Affiliation:
Department of General Economics, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper extends previous empirical studies of the environmental Kuznets curve by examining the role of rising incomes in promoting development of new technologies directed toward environmental improvements. The main result, based on an analysis of data from 19 OECD countries for the period 1980–94, shows that the income elasticity of public research and development funding for environmental protection is positive, and may be close to unity. This finding suggests that emissions of at least some pollutants may decline with income after a threshold level of income is reached. However, this should be interpreted cautiously in light of: (1) the small size of public research and development funding relative to overall spending on environmental protection, (2) the ability of a country to substitute between public and private research and development expenditures, as well as among alternative policy instruments, and (3) the possibility that public research and development funding may be a form of industrial subsidy in some countries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , November 1997 , pp. 505 - 515
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the STIR Foundation at Wageningen Agricultural University and the University of Wyoming College of Business for partial financial support and Edward Barbier, Charles Perrings, John List, Stef Proost, Jason Shogren, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.