Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:44:31.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Reuse and optimal waste policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2013

Hide-Fumi Yokoo  and
Thomas C. Kinnaman
Hide-Fumi Yokoo
Affiliation:
Department of International Studies, Division of Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha 5-1-5, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8563, Japan; and National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Thomas C. Kinnaman
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Bucknell University, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Electronic waste generated from the consumption of durable goods in developed countries is often exported to underdeveloped countries for reuse, recycling and disposal with unfortunate environmental consequences. The lack of efficient disposal policies within developing nations coupled with global free trade agreements make it difficult for consumers to internalize these costs. This paper develops a two-country model, one economically developed and the other underdeveloped, to solve for optimal tax policies necessary to achieve the efficient allocation of economic resources in an economy with a durable good available for global reuse without policy measures in the underdeveloped country. A tax in the developed country on purchases of the new durable good combined with a waste tax set below the domestic external cost of disposal is sufficient for global efficiency. The implication of allowing free global trade in electronic waste is also examined, where optimal policy resembles a global deposit-refund system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 595 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S.P. and Ginsburgh, V.A. (1994), ‘Price discrimination via second-hand markets’, European Economic Review 38: 23–44.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. (1994), ‘Strategic environmental policy and international trade’, Journal of Public Economics 54: 325–338.Google Scholar
Cassing, J. and Kuhn, T. (2003), ‘Strategic environmental policies when waste products are tradable’, Review of International Economics 11: 495–511.Google Scholar
Copeland, B.R. (1991), ‘International trade in waste products in the presence of illegal disposal’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20: 143–162.Google Scholar
Davis, L.W. and Kahn, M.E. (2010), ‘International trade in used vehicles: the environmental consequences of NAFTA’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2: 58–82.Google Scholar
Fullerton, D. and Kinnaman, T.C. (1995), ‘Garbage, recycling, and illicit burning or dumping’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullerton, D. and Wu, W. (1998), ‘Policies for green design’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 131–148.Google Scholar
Kahhat, R., Kim, J., Xu, M., Allenby, B., Williams, E., and Zhang, P. (2008), ‘Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52: 955–964.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P.W. (1994), ‘Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 49–63.Google Scholar
Kinnaman, T.C. (2010), ‘Optimal solid waste tax policy with centralized recycling’, National Tax Journal 63: 237–252.Google Scholar
Krutilla, K. (1991), ‘Environmental regulation in an open economy’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20: 127–142.Google Scholar
Puckett, J. (2005), The Digital Dump: Exporting Re-Use and Abuse to Africa, Seattle, WA: Basel Action Network.Google Scholar
Puckett, J. and Smith, T. (2002), Exporting Harm, Seattle, WA: Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition.Google Scholar
Shinkuma, T. (2007), ‘Reconsideration of an advanced disposal fee policy for end-of-life durable goods’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53: 110–121.Google Scholar
Shinkuma, T. and Managi, S. (2011), ‘The effects of introducing EPR policies in developed countries on international trade, the environment, and social welfare’, in Waste and Recycling: Theory and Empirics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, R.D. (1995), ‘Optimal pollution taxation in a Cournot duopoly’, Environmental and Resource Economics 6: 359–369.Google Scholar
Wertz, K. (1976), ‘Economic factors influencing households’ production of refuse’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoo, H.-F. (2010), ‘An economic theory of reuse’, Sustainability Science 5: 143–150.Google Scholar
Yoshida, A., Tasaki, T., and Terazono, A. (2009), ‘Material flow analysis of used personal computers in Japan’, Waste Management 29: 1602–1614.Google Scholar