Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:59:15.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the causal effect of improved fallows on environmental services provision under farmers' field conditions in Chongwe, Zambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2014

Elias Kuntashula  and
Eric Mungatana
Elias Kuntashula
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected]
Eric Mungatana
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, University of Pretoria, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The provision of environmental services on-farm by the improved fallow (an agroforestry technology) has largely remained empirically untested in sub-Saharan Africa. Where effects of planting trees have been used to estimate the impacts on consumption of fuel wood from public land, actual estimates of the size of fuel wood consumption changes have been lacking. Using data from a survey of 324 households in the Chongwe district of Zambia, we tested the hypothesis that households embracing improved fallows use less fuel wood from public land since the technology provides wood as a by-product. Estimates from ordered probit and matching strategies showed that the technology had a significant causal effect of reducing the consumption of fuel wood from public land. Therefore, in addition to promoting it for soil fertility improvement, the extension messages should explicitly reflect the technology's potential to provide on-farm environmental quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 80 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajayi, O.C., Akinnifesi, F.K., Sileshi, G., Chakeredza, S., and Matakala, P. (2007), ‘Economic framework for integrating environmental stewardship into food security strategies in low-income countries: case of agroforestry in southern African region’, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 1(4): 59–67.Google Scholar
Arnold, M., Kohlin, G., and Persson, R. (2006), ‘Woodfuels, livelihoods and policy interventions: changing perspectives’, World Development 34: 596–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardhan, P., Baland, J., Das, S., Mookherjee, D., and Sarkar, R. (2001), ‘Household firewood collection in rural Nepal: the role of poverty, collective action and modernization’, Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Böhringer, A. (2002), ‘Facilitating the wider use of agroforestry in Southern Africa’, in Eade, D. (series ed.), Eade, D. (eds), Development and Agroforestry: Scaling Up the Impacts of Research, Oxford: Oxfam GB, pp. 35–55.Google Scholar
Caliendo, M. and Kopeinig, S. (2005), ‘Some practical guidance for implementation of propensity score matching’, Discussion Paper No. 1588, Institute for the Study of Labour, Bonn.Google Scholar
Chidumayo, E.N. (1997), ‘Integration and role of planted trees in a bush-fallow cultivation system in Central Zambia’, Agroforestry Systems 7: 63–76.Google Scholar
Chidumayo, E.N. (2002), ‘Changes in miombo woodland structure under different land tenure and use systems in Central Zambia’, Journal of Biogeography 29: 1619–1626.Google Scholar
Chirwa, P.W., Ong, C.K., Maghembe, J., and Black, C.R. (2007), ‘Soil water dynamics in intercropping systems containing Gliricidia sepium, pigeon pea and maize in southern Malawi’, Agroforestry System 69: 29–43.Google Scholar
Cooke, P., Kohlin, G., and Hyde, W.F. (2008), ‘Fuel wood, forests and community management – evidence from household studies’, Environment and Development Economics 13: 103–135.Google Scholar
Cooper, P.J.M., Leakey, R.R.B., Rao, M.R., and Reynolds, L. (1996), ‘Agroforestry and the mitigation of land degradation in the humid and sub-humid tropics of Africa’, Experimental Agriculture 32: 235–290.Google Scholar
FAO (2010), ‘Forests and energy: regional perspectives: opportunities and challenges for forests and forestry’, Paper presented at the African Forestry and Wildlife Commission, 16th Session, Khartoum, Sudan.Google Scholar
Govere, I. (2002), ‘Improved tree fallow and natural miombo woodland use in eastern Zambia: the potential value of agroforestry in the conservation of indigenous forests’, M.Sc. thesis, University of Zimbabwe, Harare.Google Scholar
Government of the Republic of Zambia (2008), ‘Integrated land use assessment (ILUA) from 2005 to 2008’, Forestry Department, Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Natural Resources, Lusaka.Google Scholar
Government of the Republic of Zambia (2012), ‘Ministry of Local Government, Early Education and Environmental Protection United Nations Development Programme 2012’, Stocktaking Draft Report – Zambia, Lusaka, Lusaka: Government of Zambia.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. (2003), Econometric Analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., and Todd, P. (1998), ‘Characterizing selection bias using experimental data’, Econometrica 66(5): 1017–1098.Google Scholar
Hichaambwa, M. and Jayne, T.S. (2012), ‘Smallholder commercialization trends as affected by land constraints in Zambia: what are the policy implications?’, Working Paper No. 61, Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI), Lusaka.Google Scholar
Kaonga, M.L. and Bayliss-Smith, T.P. (2009), ‘Carbon pools in tree biomass and the soil in improved fallows in eastern Zambia’, Agroforestry Systems 76: 37–51.Google Scholar
Kohlin, G. and Parks, P.J. (2001), ‘Spatial variability and disincentives to harvest: deforestation and fuel wood collection in South Asia’, Land Economics 77: 206–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwesiga, F.R., Franzel, S., Place, F., Phiri, D., and Simwanza, C.P. (1999), ‘ Sesbania sesban improved fallows in eastern Zambia: their inception, development and farmer enthusiasm’, Agroforestry Systems 47: 49–66.Google Scholar
Kwesiga, F., Akinnifesi, F.K., Mafongoya, P.L., McDermott, M.H., and Agumya, A. (2003), ‘Agroforestry research and development in southern Africa during the 1990s: review and challenges ahead’, Agroforestry Systems 59: 173–186.Google Scholar
Mafongoya, P.L. and Kuntashula, E. (2005), ‘Participatory evaluation of Tephrosia species and provenances for soil fertility improvement and other uses using farmer criteria in eastern Zambia’, Experimental Agriculture 14: 69–80.Google Scholar
Makumba, W., Akinnifesi, F.K., Janssen, B., and Oenema, O. (2007), ‘Longterm impact of gliricidia-maize intercropping system on carbon sequestration in southern Malawi’, Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 118: 237–243.Google Scholar
Mercer, E. and Soussan, J. (1992), ‘Fuel wood problems and solutions’, in Sharma, N. (ed.), Managing the World's Forests, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, pp. 177–213.Google Scholar
Musanya, J.C. (2011), ‘The status of biofuels development in Zambia’, in Mapaure, I., Mhango, B.J. and Mulenga, D.K. (eds), Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change, Windhoek, Namibia: John Meinert Printing, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
Ndayambaje, J.D. and Mohren, G.M.J. (2011), ‘Fuel wood demand and supply in Rwanda and the role of agroforestry’, Agroforestry Systems 83: 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, S., Pinckney, T., and Jaeger, W. (1995), ‘Smallholder wood production and population pressures in East Africa: evidence of an environmental Kuznets curve?’, Land Economics 71: 516–530.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, S.K. and Depro, B.M. (2004), ‘Valuing environmental services from agroforestry: economics of soil and forest conservation in Manggarai, Indonesia’, in Alavalapti, J.R.R. and Mercer, D.E. (eds), Valuing Agroforestry Systems: Methods and Applications, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 165–182.Google Scholar
Rubin, D.B. (1974), ‘Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies’, Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runge-Metzger, A. (1988), ‘Variability in agronomic practices and allocative efficiency among farm households in northern Ghana: a case study in on-farm research’, Nyankpala Agricultural Research Report No. 2, Nyankpala, Tamale, Ghana.Google Scholar
Sileshi, G., Akinnifesi, F.K., Ajayi, O.C., Chakeredza, S., Kaonga, M., and Matakala, P. (2007), ‘Contribution of agroforestry to ecosystem services in the miombo eco-region of eastern and southern Africa’, African Journal of Environmental Science Technology 1(4): 68–80.Google Scholar
Trossero, M.A. (2002), ‘Wood energy: the way ahead’, Unasylva 53(4): 3–12.Google Scholar
WRI (World Resource Institute) (2000), A Guide to World Resources 2000–2001. People and Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of Life, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, [Available at] http://www.wri.org/publication/world-resources-2000-2001.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kuntashula and Mungatana Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Kuntashula and Mungatana Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 19.7 KB