Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:30:49.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contingent valuation in project planning and evaluation: the case of social forestry in Orissa, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2001

Gunnar Köhlin
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Göteborg University, Box 640, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden, Tel. 46–31–773 4426, Fax. 46–31–773 1043, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

There have been few applications of the contingent valuation method (CVM) to forests in developing countries. When applied, the method is seldom utilized to improve the implementation of development projects. In this paper an application of CVM to the Orissa Social Forestry Project is reported. The results show considerable variation between villages and the analysis of the bid function shows underlying factors to project success that can be used in project planning. The policy implications are to plant new VWL where natural forests are inaccessible, where people have prior experience of VWL, and where fuel consumption relies heavily on market purchases. Such plantations are expected to give greatest benefit to families with few men and many women. An analysis of the reliability of the study concludes that many of the observed biases originate from the enumerators. The study also recommends that one should be careful with the use of a discrete design in a cultural context such as this that is prone to yea-saying, and that strategic bias can arise from an open ended question that follows up the start bid in a culture characterized by bargaining.

Type
Policy Options
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This study was made possible through grants from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. The author thanks W.F. Hyde, colleagues at Göteborg University, especially Fredrik Carlsson, and a number of anonymous referees for comments. Usual disclaimer applies.