Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Scarpa, Riccardo
Kristjanson, P.
Drucker, Adam
Radeny, M.
Ruto, E.S.K.
and
Rege, J.E.O.
2002.
Valuing Indigenous Cattle Breeds in Kenya: An Empirical Comparison of Stated and Revealed Preference Value Estimates.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Scarpa, Riccardo
Ruto, Eric S.K
Kristjanson, Patti
Radeny, Maren
Drucker, Adam G
and
Rege, John E.O
2003.
Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: an empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimates.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 3,
p.
409.
Köhlin, Gunnar
and
Amacher, Gregory S.
2005.
Welfare Implications of Community Forest Plantations in Developing Countries: The Orissa Social Forestry Project.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 4,
p.
855.
Kumar, Surender
and
Rao, D. N.
2006.
Willingness to Pay Estimates of Improved Air Quality: A Case Study in Panipat Thermal Power Station Colony, India.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
COOKE, PRISCILLA
KÖHLIN, GUNNAR
and
HYDE, WILLIAM F.
2008.
Fuelwood, forests and community management – evidence from household studies.
Environment and Development Economics,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
103.
Muchapondwa, Edwin
Carlsson, Fredrik
and
Köhlin, Gunnar
2008.
WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IN ZIMBABWE: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDY.
South African Journal of Economics,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 4,
p.
685.
Tuan, Tran Huu
and
Lindhjem, Henrik
2008.
Meta-Analysis of Nature Conservation Values in Asia & Oceania: Data Heterogeneity and Benefit Transfer Issues.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Garcia, Serge
Harou, Patrice
Montagné, Claire
and
Stenger, Anne
2009.
Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Application to forest biodiversity.
Journal of Forest Economics,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
59.
Barrio, Melina
and
Loureiro, Maria L.
2010.
A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 5,
p.
1023.
Whittington, Dale
2010.
What Have We Learned from 20 Years of Stated Preference Research in Less-Developed Countries?.
Annual Review of Resource Economics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
p.
209.
Ojea, Elena
and
Loureiro, Maria L.
2011.
Identifying the scope effect on a meta-analysis of biodiversity valuation studies.
Resource and Energy Economics,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 3,
p.
706.
Ponce, Roberto D.
Vásquez, Felipe
Stehr, Alejandra
Debels, Patrick
and
Orihuela, Carlos
2011.
Estimating the Economic Value of Landscape Losses Due to Flooding by Hydropower Plants in the Chilean Patagonia.
Water Resources Management,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 10,
p.
2449.
Dikgang, Johane
and
Muchapondwa, Edwin
2012.
The valuation of biodiversity conservation by the South African Khomani San “bushmen” community.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 84,
Issue. ,
p.
7.
Gelo, Dambala
and
Koch, Steven F.
2012.
Does one size fit all? Heterogeneity in the valuation of community forestry programs.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 74,
Issue. ,
p.
85.
Robinson, Elizabeth J. Z.
Albers, Heidi J.
Meshack, Charles
and
Lokina, Razack B.
2013.
Implementing REDD through community‐based forest management: Lessons from Tanzania.
Natural Resources Forum,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 3,
p.
141.
Perrings, Charles
2014.
Environment and development economics 20 years on.
Environment and Development Economics,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
333.
Wilker, Jost
and
Rusche, Karsten
2014.
Economic valuation as a tool to support decision-making in strategic green infrastructure planning.
Local Environment,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 6,
p.
702.
Desbureaux, Sébastien
and
Brimont, Laura
2015.
Between economic loss and social identity: The multi-dimensional cost of avoiding deforestation in Eastern Madagascar.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 118,
Issue. ,
p.
10.
Gelo, Dambala
and
Koch, Steven F.
2015.
Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia: Controlling for preference anomalies in double-bounded CVM.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 114,
Issue. ,
p.
79.
Choi, Ik-Chang
Kim, Hyun No
Shin, Hio-Jung
Tenhunen, John
and
Nguyen, Trung
2016.
Willingness to Pay for a Highland Agricultural Restriction Policy to Improve Water Quality in South Korea: Correcting Anomalous Preference in Contingent Valuation Method.
Water,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 11,
p.
547.