Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:46:50.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carbon-sensitive productivity, climate and institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2015

Surender Kumar  and
Shunsuke Managi
Surender Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Business Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Shunsuke Managi
Affiliation:
Departments of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Global Environmental Engineering Program, School of Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka Nishi-ku Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan; and QUT Business School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Tel: 81-92-802-3366, Fax: 81-22-795-4309. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Climate and institutions might be crucial in lowering the vagaries of climate change impacts in terms of productivity. This study measures the relationships of productivity measures adjusted for the regulation of carbon emission and institutions together with climate change throughout the world. This paper finds that there is higher potential for reduction of CO2 emissions in developing countries at lower cost. However, the cost to reduce emissions lowers their growth potential in terms of lost productivity growth. Better institutions help to lower the negative impacts of climate change by improving the process of technological adoption in developing countries. Climate change reduces the productivity growth in developing countries by lowering the process of technological adoption, and better institutions result in higher productivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 109 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D. and Johnson, S. (2005), ‘Unbundling institutions’, Journal of Political Economy 113: 949–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. (2001), ‘Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 1231–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J., and Thaicharoen, Y. (2003), ‘Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth’, Journal of Monetary Economics 50: 49–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, S.E. and Dorfman, R.H. (2005), ‘Crediting electric utilities for reducing air pollution: Bayesian measurement of productivity and efficiency’, Journal of Econometrics 126: 445–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosello, F., Roson, R., and Tol, R.S.J. (2006), ‘Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: human health’, Ecological Economics 58: 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D.W. (ed.) (1995), Handbook of Environmental Economics, London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chung, Y., Färe, R., and Grosskopf, S. (1997), ‘Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach’, Journal of Environmental Management 51: 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropper, M.L. and Oates, W.E. (1992), ‘Environmental economics: a survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 30(2): 675–740.Google Scholar
Dell, M., Jones, B.F., and Olken, B.A. (2012), ‘Temperature shocks and economic growth: evidence from the last half century’, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4(3): 66–95.Google Scholar
Dell, M., Jones, B.F., and Olken, B.A. (2014), ‘What do we know from the weather? The new climate-economy literature’, Journal of Economic Literature 52(3): 740–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschênes, O. and Greenstone, M. (2007), ‘The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather’, American Economic Review 97(1): 354–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (2003), ‘Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics 50: 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollop, F.M. and Roberts, M.J. (1983), ‘Environmental regulations and productivity growth: the case of fossil-fuelled electric power generation’, Journal of Political Economy 91: 654–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halkos, G.E. and Tzeremes, N.G. (2013a), ‘A conditional directional distance function approach for measuring regional environmental efficiency: evidence from UK regions’, European Journal of Operational Research 227(1): 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halkos, G.E. and Tzeremes, N.G. (2013b), ‘Carbon dioxide emissions and governance: a nonparametric analysis for the G-20’, Energy Economics 40: 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.E. and Jones, C. (1999), ‘Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, J.K. (2009), ‘The income–temperature relationship in a cross-section of countries and its implications for predicting the effects of global warming’, Environmental and Resource Economics 44: 475–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, E. (1915), Civilization and Climate, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G., and Stavins, R.N. (2003), ‘Technological change and the environment’, in Mäler, K.-G. and Vincent, J. (eds), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Jishnu, L. (2011), ‘No climate for cleantech’, DownToEarth, 1–15 November, p. 50.Google Scholar
Kanie, N. and Managi, S. (2014), ‘Stimulating 2015 climate deal: governance of low carbon technology transfer’, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 16(2): 111–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, G. (1998), ‘Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: a structural approach’, Journal of Applied Statistics 25(4): 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. (2006), ‘Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: a global analysis using Malmquist–Luenberger index’, Ecological Economics 56(2): 280–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. and Khanna, M. (2009), ‘Measurement of environmental efficiency and productivity: a cross-country analysis’, Environment and Development Economics 14: 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. and Managi, S. (2009), ‘Energy price-induced and exogenous technological change: assessing the economic and environmental outcomes’, Resource and Energy Economics 31(4): 334–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. and Managi, S. (2010), ‘Environment and productivities in developed and developing countries: the case of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide’, Journal of Environmental Management 91(7): 1580–1592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S. and Russell, R. (2002), ‘Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence’, American Economic Review 92(3): 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuosmanen, T. (2003), ‘Duality theory of non-convex technologies’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 20: 273–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, D., Manley, M., and Kurukulasuriya, P. (2007), ‘The impact of climate change on African agriculture’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 4306, Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Managi, S. (2011), Technology, Natural Resources and Economic Growth: Improving the Environment for a Greener Future, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Managi, S., Opaluch, J.J., Jin, D., and Grigalunas, T.A. (2004), ‘Technological change and depletion in offshore oil and gas’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47(2): 388–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Managi, S., Opaluch, J.J., Jin, D., and Grigalunas, T.A. (2005), ‘Environmental regulations and technological change in the offshore oil and gas industry’, Land Economics 81(2): 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. (1920 [1890]), Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W., and Shaw, D. (1994), ‘The impact of global warming on agriculture: a Ricardian analysis’, American Economic Review 84(4): 753–771.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, R., Morrison, W., Schlesinger, M., and Andronova, N. (2000), ‘Country-specific market impacts of climate change’, Climatic Change 45(3–4): 553–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyama, E. and Managi, S. (2014), ‘Global environmental emissions estimate: application of multiple imputation’, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 16(2): 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, C. de (1750), The Spirit of Laws. Amsterdam: Chatelain.Google Scholar
Murty, M.N. and Kumar, S. (2004), Environmental and Economic Accounting for Industry, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murty, S. and Russell, R. (2002), ‘On modelling pollution generating technologies’, Working Paper No. 02–14, Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, CA.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. (1993), ‘Climate and economic development: climates past and climate change future’, in Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2006), ‘Geography and macroeconomics: new data and new findings’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(10): 3510–3517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordhaus, W.D. (2010), ‘Economic aspects of global warming in a post Copenhagen environment’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(26): 11721–11726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. and Boyer, J. (2000), Warming the World: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D.C. (1991), ‘Institutions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picazo-Tadeo, A., Beltrá-Esteve, M., and Gómez-Limón, J.A. (2012), ‘Assessing ecoefficiency with directional distance functions’, European Journal of Operational Research 220: 798–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittman, R.W. (1981), ‘Issues in pollution control: interplant cost differences and economies of scale’, Land Economics 57(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittman, R.W. (1983), ‘Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs’, Economic Journal 93: 883–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, S., Lovell, C.A.K., and Thijssen, G. (1999), ‘Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: an application to Dutch dairy farms’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1): 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. (2004), ‘Institutions rules: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development’, Journal of Economic Growth 9: 131–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. (2003), ‘Institutions don't rule: direct effect of geography on per capita income’, NBER Working Paper No. 9490, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahoo, B.K. and Tone, K. (2013), ‘Non-parametric measurement of economies of scale and scope in non-competitive environment with price uncertainty’, Omega 41: 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, W., Hanemann, W.M., and Fisher, A.C. (2006), ‘The impact of global warming on U.S. agriculture: an econometric analysis of optimal growing conditions’, Review of Economics and Statistics 88(1): 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simar, L. and Wilson, P. (1999), ‘Of course we can bootstrap DEA scores! But does it mean anything? Logic trumps wishful thinking’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 11: 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simar, L. and Wilson, P. (2007), ‘Estimation and inference in two stage, semi-parametric models of productive efficiency’, Journal of Econometrics 136: 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R.S.J. (2002), ‘Estimates of the damage costs of climate change’, Environmental and Resource Economics 21: 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tone, K. and Sahoo, B.K. (2003), ‘Scale, indivisibilities and production function in data envelopment analysis’, International Journal of Production Economics 84: 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Managi, S., and Sato, M. (2014), ‘The effect of institutional quality on national wealth: an examination using multiple imputation method’, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies; doi:10.1007/s10018-014-0084-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelenyuk, V. and Zheka, V. (2006), ‘Corporate governance and firm's efficiency: the case of a transitional country, Ukraine’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 25: 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar