Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:05:39.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural development and the industry life cycle on the Brazilian frontier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2013

Simon C. Hall  and
Jill Caviglia-Harris
Simon C. Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Jill Caviglia-Harris
Affiliation:
Economics and Finance Department & Environmental Studies Department, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD 21801-6860, USA. Tel: (410) 548-5591. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The occupation of the last remaining tropical forests has been an initiative of many developing nations that is debated by the global community due to impacts on soil erosion, biodiversity loss and contributions to global climate change. Arguments against development range from the irreversible nature of tropical deforestation to the synergistic losses associated with environmental degradation and continued poverty. The focus of this paper is to determine if evidence of market advancements and growth can be found in an Amazonian settlement, thus providing counter-evidence for the boom–bust pattern of development that has been predicted for much of the Amazon. Using panel survey data (for four survey waves between 1996 and 2009), we find trends that are consistent with the industrial life cycle, suggesting a pattern that is more consistent with growth, development and consolidation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 326 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, S.P., Walker, R.T., Caldas, M.M., and Perz, S. (2006), ‘Land-cover and land-use change in the Brazilian Amazon: smallholders, ranchers, and frontier stratification’, Economic Geography 82: 265–289.Google Scholar
Allison, P.D. (2010), Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Stata, Longitudinal Data Analysis workshop companion material, College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
Amoroso, B. (2007), ‘Globalization and poverty: winners and losers’, Development 50: 12–19.Google Scholar
Andersen, L., Granger, C.W.J., Reis, E.J., Weinhold, D., and Wunder, S. (2002), The Dynamics of Deforestation and Economic Growth in the Brazilian Amazon, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aragão, L.E.O.C., Malhi, Y., Barbier, N., Lima, A., Shimabukuro, Y., Anderson, L., and Saatchi, S. (2008), ‘Interactions between rainfall, deforestation and fires during recent years in the Brazilian Amazonia’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 1779–1785.Google Scholar
Barbier, E.B. (2004), ‘Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 1347–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E.B. (2005), Natural Resources and Economic Development, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, C.F. (2006), An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata, 1st ednCollege Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A.R. (2011a), ‘Environmental licensing and land aggregation: an agent-based approach to understanding ranching and land use in rural Rondônia’, Ecology and Society 16: 31.Google Scholar
Bell, A.R. (2011b), ‘Highly Optimized Tolerant (HOT) farms in Rondônia: productivity and farm size, and implications for environmental licensing’, Ecology and Society 16(2): 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, R.A., Malhi, Y., and Roberts, J.T. (2008), ‘The future of the Amazon: new perspectives from climate, ecosystem and social sciences’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 1729–1735.Google Scholar
Browder, J. (1994), ‘Surviving in Rondônia: the dynamics of colonist farming strategies in Brazil's Northwest frontier’, Studies in Comparative International Development 29: 45–69.Google Scholar
Browder, J.O., Pedlowski, M.A., and Summers, P.M. (2004), ‘Land use patterns in the Brazilian Amazon: comparative farm-level evidence from Rondônia’, Human Ecology 32: 197–224.Google Scholar
Browder, J.O., Pedlowski, M.A., Walker, R., Wynne, R.H., Summers, P.M., Abad, A., Becerra-Cordoba, N., and Mil-Homens, J. (2008), ‘Revisiting theories of frontier expansion in the Brazilian Amazon: a survey of the colonist farming population in Rondônia's post-frontier, 1992–2002’, World Development 36: 1469–1492.Google Scholar
Caviglia-Harris, J.L. (2004), ‘Household production and forest clearing: the role of farming in the development of the Amazon’, Environment and Development Economics 9: 181–202.Google Scholar
Caviglia-Harris, J.L. (2005), ‘Cattle accumulation and land use intensification by households in the Brazilian Amazon’, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 34: 145–162.Google Scholar
Caviglia-Harris, J., Sills, E.O., Jones, L., Saha, S., Harris, D., McArdle, S., Roberts, D., Pedlowski, M., and Powell, R. (2009), ‘Modeling land use and land cover change in an Amazonian frontier settlement: strategies for addressing population change and panel attrition’, Land Use Science 4: 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIA (2012), The World Factbook 2012, Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Cochrane, T.T. and Cochrane, T.A. (2006), ‘Diversity of the land resources in the Amazonian State of Rondônia, Brazil’, Acta Amazonia 36: 91–101.Google Scholar
Cutter, S.L. and Renwick, W.H. (2004), Exploitation, Conservation, Preservation: A Geographic Perspective on Natural Resource Use, 4th edn, Danvers, MA: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
D'Antona, Á., VanWey, L., and Hayashi, C. (2006), ‘Property size and land cover change in the Brazilian Amazon’, Population & Environment 27: 373–396.Google Scholar
de Almeida, A.L.O. and Campari, J.S. (1995), Sustainable Settlement in the Brazilian Amazon, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
du Toit, A. (2008), ‘Living on the margins: the social dynamics of economic marginalisation’, Development Southern Africa 25: 135–150.Google Scholar
Faminow, M.D. (1998), Cattle, Deforestation and Development in the Amazon: An Economic, Agronomic and Environmental Perspective, 1st ednWallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
Fearnside, P.M. (2002), ‘Avanca Brasil: environmental and social consequences of Brazil's planned infrastructure in Amazonia’, Environmental Management 30: 735–747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, J. (2002), ‘Linear Mixed Models’. Appendix to an R and S-PLUS Companion to Applied Regression, [Available at] http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Fox-Companion/appendix.html.Google Scholar
Gibbs, H.K., Ruesch, A.S., Achard, F., Clayton, M.K., Holmgren, P., Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.A. (2010), ‘Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 16732–16737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodland, R.J.A. and Irwin, H.S. (1975), Amazon Jungle: Green Hell to Red Desert? An Ecological Discussion of the Environmental Impact of the Highway Construction Program in the Amazon Basin, Oxford: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gras, N.S.B. (1946), A History of Agriculture in Europe and America, New York: F.S. Crofts.Google Scholar
Griffin, K.B. (1979), The Political Economy of Agrarian Change: An Essay on the Green Revolution, 2nd ednLondon: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, R.G. (2008), ‘Tricks of the trade: getting the most out of xtmixed’, text presented at the 2008 UK Stata Users Group Meeting, 11 September.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. (1994), ‘The role of multinationals in economic development: the benefits of FDI’, Columbia Journal of World Business 29: 6–11.Google Scholar
Hong, Z. (1987), The Homestead Act and American Agricultural Capitalism, 1862–1900, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
IBGE (2010), Projeção da População do Brasil por sexo e Idade para o Período 1980–2050 and Tabela 1286 – População nos Censos Demográficos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.Google Scholar
INPE (2011), Projeto Prodes: Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite, Guamá Belém, Brazil: National Institute for Space Research (INPE).Google Scholar
IPCC (2007), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.W. (2009), The Laws That Shaped America: Fifteen Acts of Congress and Their Lasting Impact, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnston, B.F. and Kilby, P. (1975), Agriculture and Structural Transformation: Economic Strategies in Late Developing Countries, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, D.W., Dale, V.H., Beauchamp, J.J., Pedlowski, M.A., and O'Neill, R.V. (1995), ‘Farming in Rondonia’, Resource and Energy Economics 17: 155–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klepper, S. and Graddy, E. (1990), ‘The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure’, RAND Journal of Economics 21: 27–44.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991), ‘Increasing returns and economic geography’, Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499.Google Scholar
Kudva, N. (2009), ‘The everyday and the episodic: the spatial and political impacts of urban informality’, Environment and Planning A 41: 1614–1628.Google Scholar
Kukalis, S. (2009), ‘Agglomeration economies and firm performance: the case of industry clusters’, Journal of Management 36: 453–481.Google Scholar
Laurance, W.F., Cochrane, M.A., Bergen, S., Fearnside, P.M., Delamonica, P., Barber, C., D'Angelo, S., and Fernandes, T. (2001), ‘Environment: the future of the Brazilian Amazon’, Science 291: 438–439.Google Scholar
Lee, L.B. (1979), Kansas and the Homestead Act, 1862–1905, New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, S.L., Brando, P.M., Phillips, O.L., van der Heijden, G.M.F., and Nepstad, D. (2011), ‘The 2010 Amazon drought’, Science 331: 554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, T.M. (2002), ‘Local histories, global markets: cocoa and class in Upland Sulawesi’, Development and Change 33: 415–437.Google Scholar
Londregan, J. (1990), ‘Entry and exit over the industry life cycle’, RAND Journal of Economics 21: 446–458.Google Scholar
Lustig, N., Lopez-Calva, L.F., and Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2011), ‘The decline in inequality in Latin America: how much, since when and why’, Working Paper No. 1118, Tulane Economics Working Paper Series, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhi, Y., Roberts, J.T., Betts, R.A., Killeen, T.J., Li, W., and Nobre, C.A. (2008), ‘Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon’, Science 319: 169–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malthus, T.R. (1798), An Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society: With Remarks on the Speculation of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers, London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics; an Introductory Volume, 8th edn, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G., and Swift, M.J. (1997), ‘Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties’, Science 277: 504–509.Google Scholar
McGregor, A. and McConnachie, M. (1995), ‘Social exclusion, urban regeneration and economic reintegration’, Urban Studies 32: 1587–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, D.C. (1997), ‘First-mover advantages and path dependence’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 15: 827–850.Google Scholar
Nepstad, D.C., Stickler, C.M., Soares-Filho, B., and Merry, F. (2008), ‘Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: prospects for a near-term forest tipping point’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 1737–1746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacheco, P. (2009), ‘Smallholder livelihoods, wealth and deforestation in the Eastern Amazon’, Human Ecology 37: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedlowski, M.A., Dale, V.H., Matricardi, E.A.T., and Pereira da Silva Filho, E. (1997), ‘Patterns and impacts of deforestation in Rondônia, Brazil’, Landscape and Urban Planning 38: 149–157.Google Scholar
Pfaff, A.S.P. (1999), ‘What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from satellite and socioeconomic data’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37: 26–43.Google Scholar
Phillips, O.L., Aragao, L.E.O.C., Lewis, S.L., Fisher, J.B., Lloyd, J., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Malhi, Y., et al. (2009), ‘Drought sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest’, Science 323: 1344–1347.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S.W. and Bryk, A.S. (2001), Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ednThousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rocha, C. (2009), ‘Developments in national policies for food and nutrition security in Brazil’, Development Policy Review 27: 51–66.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A.S.L., Ewers, R.M., Parry, L., Souza, C., Verissimo, A., and Balmford, A. (2009), ‘Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier’, Science 324: 1435–1437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, A. (2011), ‘Slumdog cities: rethinking subaltern urbanism’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35: 223–238.Google Scholar
Sadoulet, E. and de Janvry, A. (1995), Quantitative Development Policy Analysis, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sadoulet, E., de Janvry, A., and Benjamin, C. (1998), ‘Household behavior with imperfect labor markets’, Industrial Relations 37: 85–108.Google Scholar
Schneider, R.R. (1995), Government and the Economy on the Amazon Frontier, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), ‘Cost and demand functions of the individual firm’, American Economic Review 32: 349–350.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, S., McGrath, D.G., Stickler, C.M., Lubowski, R., Piris-Cabezas, P., Rivero, S., Alencar, A., et al. (2009), ‘The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon’, Science 326: 1350–1351.Google Scholar
Scott, J.C. (1999), Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shively, G.E. (2001), ‘Agricultural change, rural labor markets, and forest clearing: an illustrative case from the Philippines’, Land Economics 77: 268–284.Google Scholar
Shukla, J., Nobre, C., and Sellers, P. (1990). ‘Amazon deforestation and climate change’, Science 247: 1322–1325.Google Scholar
Sills, E.O. and Caviglia-Harris, J.L. (2009), ‘Evolution of the Amazonian frontier: land values in Rondônia, Brazil’, Land Use Policy 26: 55–67.Google Scholar
Singh, I., Squire, L., and Strauss, J. (1986), ‘A survey of agricultural household models: recent findings and policy implications’, World Bank Economic Review 1: 149–179.Google Scholar
Storper, M. (1995), ‘Territorial development in the global learning economy: the challenge to developing countries’, Review of International Political Economy 2: 394–424.Google Scholar
Teraji, S. (2011), ‘An economic analysis of social exclusion and inequality’, Journal of Socio-Economics 40: 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. (2003), ‘Mapping process to pattern in the landscape change of the Amazonian frontier’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93: 376–398.Google Scholar
Walker, R., Perz, S., Caldas, M., and Guilherme Teixeira Silva, L. (2002), ‘Land use and land cover change in forest frontiers: the role of household life cycles’, International Regional Science Review 25: 169.Google Scholar
Wu, F. (2004), ‘Urban poverty and marginalization under market transition: the case of Chinese cities’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28: 401–423.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

HARRIS Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download HARRIS Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 113.9 KB