Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T22:08:09.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turning Silk Purses into Sows' Ears: Environmental History and the Chemical Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

John K. Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, environmental historians have called for histories of the environmental damage caused by chemical companies in the era before strict federal regulation, which began in the late 1960s. This article examines how chemical companies, pollution experts, and government agencies defined the problems of pollution and sought remedies for it. With a few exceptions, until the mid-1930s chemical companies dealt with pollution problems in an ad hoc fashion, acting in response to complaints. National attention to water pollution began during the New Deal, when Roosevelt appointed a National Resources Committee and legislation was introduced that would have established federal control of water pollution. These events galvanized the industry to begin to pay systematic attention to water pollution by establishing pollution engineering positions, forming trade association committees, and organizing symposia at professional meetings.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 785 - 812
Copyright
Copyright © Enterprise and Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Arora, Ashish,Landau, Ralph, andRosenberg, Nathan, eds.Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth.New York,1998.Google Scholar
Blatnik, John A. “History of Federal Pollution Control Legislation.” InIndustrial Pollution Control Handbook, ed.Herbert F., Lund.New York,1971, pp.1–10.Google Scholar
Bozdogan, Kikor. “The Transformation of the US Chemicals Industry.” InThe Working Papers of the MIT Commission of Industrial Productivity.Cambridge, Mass.,1989, pp.1–103.Google Scholar
Brandt, E. N. Growth Company: Dow Chemical's First Century.Lansing, Mich.,1997.Google Scholar
Chemical and Engineering News.1954.Google Scholar
Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering. 1931,1937,1939,1945.Google Scholar
Chemical Engineering.1955.Google Scholar
Chemical Week.1956.Google Scholar
Colton, Craig E. “Creating a Toxic Landscape: Chemical Waste Disposal Policy and Practice, 1900-1960”.Environmental History Review 18 (Spring1994):86–116.Google Scholar
Colton, Craig E. andSkinner, Peter N..The Road to Love Canal: Managing Waste before Love Canal.Austin, Texas,1996.Google Scholar
“Development of Accident Prevention Work in E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Company, 16 Sept.1932, Accession 1615, box 8,Hagley Museum and Library.Google Scholar
DuPont Company Annual Report 1952.Google Scholar
“The DuPont Company and Trade Waste Disposal,” Accession 1662, box 77,Hagley Museum and Library,Wilmington, Del..Google Scholar
DuPont Newsletter.1968.Google Scholar
DuPont Public Affairs Files, Accession 1410, box 42,Hagley Museum and Library.Google Scholar
Esteghamat, Kian., “Structure and Performance of the Chemical Industry under Regulation”. InChemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth, ed.Ashish, Arora,Ralph, Landau, andNathan, Rosenberg.New York,1998,341–74.Google Scholar
Haynes, Williams, ed.The Chemical Who's Who, Volume II 1937.New Haven, Conn.,1937.Google Scholar
Holland, Maurice.,Industrial Explorers.New York,1928.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A., andSmit, John Kenly Jr.Science and Corporate Strategy: DuPont R'D, 1902-80.New York,1988.Google Scholar
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 1936,1939,1947,1952.Google Scholar
Industrial Water and Wastes.1961.Google Scholar
“Making Synthetics Safe.”Fortune (Oct.1954):138 ff.Google Scholar
M. F. Wood to Robert W. Patterson. 12 Sept. 1960; 13 Oct. 1960. Accession 1814, box 13,Hagley Museum and Library.Google Scholar
Practical Public Relations.1964.Google Scholar
Proceedings of the First National Conference on Air Pollution (Los Angeles:Stanford Research Institute,1949).Google Scholar
Rudolfs, Willem. “The Problem.” InIndustrial Wastes: Their Disposal and Treatment, ed.Willem, Rudolfs.New York,1953, pp.1–7.Google Scholar
Sarokin, David J.,et al.Cutting Chemical Wastes: What 29 Organic Chemical Plants Are Doing to Reduce Hazardous Wastes.New York,1986.Google Scholar
Sellers, Christopher., “Discovering Environmental Cancer: Wilhelm Hueper, Post-World War II Epidemiology, and the Vanishing Clinicians Eye.”American Journal of Public Health 87, no. 11. (Nov.1997):55–83.Google Scholar
Sellers, Christopher.,“Factory as Environment: Industrial Hygiene, Professional Collaboration and the Modern Sciences of Pollution.” Environmental History Review 18 (Spring1994):55–83.Google Scholar
Sewage and Industrial Wastes.1950.Google Scholar
Stine, Jeffrey K., andTarr., Joel A. “At the Intersection of Histories: Technology and the Environment.”Technology and Culture 39, no. 4 (Oct.1998):601–40.Google Scholar
Transactions of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers.1931.Google Scholar
U.S. National Resources Committee, Special Advisory Committee on Water Pollution. Report on Water Pollution (Washington,D.C.,1935).Google Scholar
U.S. National Resources Committee, Special Advisory Committee on Water Pollution,Water Pollution in the United States: Third Report of the Special Advisory Committee on Water Pollution (Washington,D.C.,1939).Google Scholar
Whorton, James.Before Silent Spring.Princeton,N.J., 1974.Google Scholar