Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:39:20.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hybridizing the Emerging European Corporation: Danone, Hachette, and the Divisionalization Process in France during the 1970s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Pierre-Antoine Dessaux  and
Jean-Philippe Mazaud
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of the uses of the multidivisional form in the French context at the end of the 1960s and the beginning of the 1970s. Comparing two case studies, Danone and Hachette, it sheds light on specific experiences in two different industries, the food and the book industry, respectively, in order to contribute to the debate over the Chandlerian paradigm. These two cases show that the implementation of the M-form in European companies can neither be reduced to the necessary diffusion of a universal structure nor to managerial fashion. At first a matter of redistributing the power between the shareholders and the management, the M-form led to hybrid organizations with characteristics heavily dependent on intensive internal negotiations. These findings emphasize the potential diversity of the implementation of the M-form and of the relations between management and shareholders. Far from being linear, company trajectories then heavily depend on partial compromises.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 227 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2006. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Boyer, Robert, Elsie Charron, Ulrich Jurgens, and Steven Tolliday, eds. Between Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. Oxford, U.K., 1998.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago, 1979.Google Scholar
Bussière, Eric. Paribas, l’Europe et le monde, 1872–1992. Anvers, France, 1992.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass., 1962.Google Scholar
Channon, Derek F. The Strategy and Structure of British Enterprise. London, 1973.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, 1991.Google Scholar
Dyas, Gareth P. The Strategy and Structure of French Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass., 1973.Google Scholar
Dyas, Gareth P., and Thanheiser, Heinz T.. The Emerging European Enterprise: Strategy and Structure in French and German Industry. London, 1976.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. The Transformation of the Corporate Control. Cambridge, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar
Freeland, Robert. The Struggle for Control of the Modern Corporation: Organizational Change at General Motors, 1924–1970. Cambridge, Mass., 2002.Google Scholar
Herrigel, Gary, and Jonathan Zeitlin, eds. Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking U.S. Technology and Management in Postwar Europe and Japan. Oxford, U.K., 2000.Google Scholar
Kuisel, Richard F. Capitalism and the State in Modern France: Renovation and Economic Management in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, U.K., 1981.Google Scholar
Pavan, Robert J. The Strategy and Structure of Italian Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass., 1973.Google Scholar
Rapport de la Commission des Industries Agro-alimentaires du IVe Plan. Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
Rumelt, Richard P. Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, Mass., 1974.Google Scholar
Thanheiser, Heinz T. The Strategy and Structure of German Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass., 1972.Google Scholar
Whittington, Richard, and Michael Mayer. The European Corporation: Strategy, Structure, and Social Science. Oxford, U.K., 2000.Google Scholar

Articles

Asselain, Jean-Charles, and Bertrand Blancheton. “Les équilibres vitaux: la dépendance alimentaire de l’Europe.” Revue économique 51 (Jan. 2000): 195–212.Google Scholar
Cailluet, Ludovic. “McKinsey, Total-CFP et la M-form. Un exemple français d’adaptation d’un modèle d’organisation importé.” Entreprises et histoire 25 (Oct. 2000): 26–45.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D., Jr. “The Enduring Logic of Industrial Success.” Harvard Business Review 68 (March–April 1990): 434–44.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (April 1983): 147–60.Google Scholar
Freeland, Robert. “The Myth of the M-form? Governance, Consent, and Organizational Change.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (Sept. 1996): 483–526.Google Scholar
“Gervais-Danone, un mariage de riches.” L’Expansion (Dec. 1968), 25.Google Scholar
“Interview with Antoine Riboud.” Entreprise (24 Jan. 1973), 42.Google Scholar
Jannic, Hervé. “Hachette, marchand de lecture depuis cent cinquante ans.” L’Expansion (May 1971), 31.Google Scholar
Karpik, Lucien. “La confiance: réalité ou illusion? Examen critique d’une thèse de Williamson.” Revue économique 49 (July 1998): 1043–56.Google Scholar
Kogut, Bruce. “Evolution of the Large Firm in France in Comparative Perspective.” Entreprises et histoire 19 (Oct. 1998): 131–51.Google Scholar
Lévy-Leboyer, Maurice. “Le patronat français a-t-il été malthusien?” Le mouvement social 88 (July–Sept. 1974): 1–49.Google Scholar
Mazaud, Jean-Philippe. “Les pratiques de contrôle du commerce des livres chez Hachette, 1945–1980.” Entreprises et histoire 24 (June 2000): 80–92.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, and Brian Rowan. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure, Myth, and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (Sept. 1977): 340–63.Google Scholar
“Portrait of Francis Gautier.” Hommes et commerce (April 1973), 5–7.Google Scholar
Scott, Bruce. “The Industrial State: Old Myths and New Realities.” Harvard Business Review 51 (March–April 1973): 135–48.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “Transaction Cost Economics and Organizational Theory.” Industrial and Corporate Change 2 (March–April 1993): 107–56.Google Scholar

Oral Histories

Bonnet, Pierre, interview with Pierre-Antoine Dessaux. 7 May 1998, June 1998.Google Scholar
Labouret, Claude, interview with Jean-Philippe Mazaud. October 1996.Google Scholar
Labuzan, Pierre, interview with Pierre-Antoine Dessaux. June 1997.Google Scholar
Marchandise, Jacques, interview with Jean-Philippe Mazaud. Jan. 1994.Google Scholar

Unpublished Sources

Dessaux, Pierre-Antoine. “Des vermicelliers au groupe Danone: consommer, produire et vendre des pâtes alimentaires en France, 17e-20e siècles.” Ph.D. diss., Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, 2003.Google Scholar
Mazaud, Jean-Philippe. “De la Librairie au groupe Hachette (1944–1980): transformations des pratiques dirigeantes dans le livre.” Ph.D. diss., Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, 2002.Google Scholar
Meuleau, Marc. “Les HEC et l’évolution du management en France (1881–années 1980).” Ph.D. diss., Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1992.Google Scholar

Archival Sources

Crédit Lyonnais Archives, Paris.Google Scholar
Pierre Moussa Papers, Pierre Moussa Library, Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Hachette Library, Institut Mémoire de l’Edition Contemporaine Archives, Paris.Google Scholar
Paribas Archives, Paris.Google Scholar