Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:17:39.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Extensive Side of Nineteenth-Century Military Economy: The Tent Industry in the Northern United States during the Civil War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Abstract

Because most histories of military-industrial relations have rested on the examples of arms production and shipbuilding, balanced accounts of military procurement and technologies during the nineteenth century are difficult to find. In fact, weapons and ships accounted for a relatively small fraction of all the goods and services consumed by nineteenth-century armed forces. This article, which describes the tent industry in the United States during the Civil War, suggests that many military enterprises of the period were characterized by an industrial dynamic that was relatively extensive rather than intensive. In the U.S. tent industry, the leading military contractors were mercantile firms, which stood at the center of disintegrated production and distribution networks. Featuring relatively low-capital production arrangements, large numbers of women workers, and powerful mercantile intermediaries who linked manufacturers and army purchasing agents, the Civil War tent business is an example that challenges traditional accounts of the economic foundations of nineteenth-century military capability.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Enterprise and Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Adams Sampson & Co. New England Business Directory. Boston, 1860.Google Scholar
Adams Sampson & Co. New England Business Directory. Boston, 1865.Google Scholar
Alder, Ken. Engineering the Revolution: Arms and Enlightenment in France, 1763-1815. Princeton, N.J., 1997.Google Scholar
Billings, John D. Hardtack and Coffee, or the Unwritten Story of Army Life. Boston, 1888.Google Scholar
Black, Robert C. III. The Railroads of the Confederacy. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1952.Google Scholar
Bruce, Robert V. Lincoln and the Tools of War. Indianapolis, Ind., 1956.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, Mass., 1977.Google Scholar
Cooling, Benjamin Franklin. Gray Steel and Blue Water Navy: The Formative Years of America's Military-Industrial Complex, 1881-1917. Hamden, Conn., 1979.Google Scholar
Davis, Carl L. Arming the Union: Small Arms in the Civil War. Port Washington, N.Y., 1973.Google Scholar
DeCredico, Mary A. Patriotism for Profit: Georgia's Urban Entrepreneurs and the Confederate War Effort. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1990.Google Scholar
Deyrup, Felicia Johnson. Arms Makers ofthe Connecticut Valley: A Regional Study of the Economic Development of the Small Arms Industry, 17981870. Northampton, Mass., 1948.Google Scholar
Dew, Charles B. Ironmaker to the Confederacy: Joseph R. Anderson and the Tredegar Iron Works. New Haven, Conn., 1966.Google Scholar
Farley, James J. Making Arms in the Machine Age: Philadelphia's Frankford Arsenal, 1816-1870. University Park, Pa., 1994.Google Scholar
Feldman, Egal. Fit for Men: A Study of New York's Clothing Trade. Washington, D.C., 1960.Google Scholar
Gallman, J. Matthew. Mastering Wartime: A Social History of Philadelphia during the Civil War. New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Hagerman, Edward. The American Civil War and the Origins of Modern Warfare: Ideas, Organization, and Field Command. Bloomington, Ind., 1988.Google Scholar
Hall, Henry, ed. America's Successful Men of Affairs: An Encyclopedia of Contemporaneous Biography, 2 vols. New York, 1895-96, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Thomas R. Ships for the Seven Seas: Philadelphia Shipbuilding in the Age ofIndustrial Capitalism. Baltimore, Md., 1997.Google Scholar
History of Litchfield County, Connecticut. Philadelphia, 1881.Google Scholar
History of Middlesex County, Connecticut. New York, 1884.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A. From the American System to Mass Production, 18001932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. Baltimore, Md., 1984.Google Scholar
The Income Record: A List Giving the Taxable Income for the Year 1863 of Every Resident of New York. New York, 1865.Google Scholar
Income Tax of the Residents of Philadelphia and Bucks County for the Year Ending April 30, 1865. Philadelphia, 1865.Google Scholar
Knowlton, Evelyn H. Pepperell's Progress: History ofa Cotton Textile Company, 1844-1945. Cambridge, Mass., 1948.Google Scholar
Koistinen, Paul A. C. BeatingPlowshares into Swords: The Political Economy of American Warfare, 1606-1865. Lawrence, Kans., 1996.Google Scholar
Koistinen, Paul A. C. Mobilizing for Modern War: The Political Economy of American Warfare, 1865-1919. Lawrence, Kans., 1997.Google Scholar
Licht, Walter. Industrializing America: The Nineteenth Century. Baltimore, Md., 1995.Google Scholar
McNeill, William H. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force and Society since A.D. 1000. Chicago, 1982.Google Scholar
Merrill, Georgia Drew, ed. History of Androscoggin County, Maine. Boston, 1891.Google Scholar
Miller, Cynthia Ann. “The United States Army Logistics Complex, 1818–1845.” Ph.D. diss., Syracuse University, 1991.Google Scholar
Misa, Thomas J. A Nation of Steel: The Making of Modern America, 1865–1925. Baltimore, Md., 1995.Google Scholar
Neely, Mark E. Jr., The Fate of Liberty: Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Porter, Glenn, and Livesay, Harold C.. Merchants and Manufacturers: Studies in the Changing Structure of Nineteenth-Century Marketing. Baltimore, Md., 1971.Google Scholar
Risch, Erna. Quartermaster Support of the Army: A History of the Corps, 1775-1939. Washington, D.C., 1962.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan, ed. The American System of Manufactures: The Report of the Committee on the Machinery of the United States 1855 and the Special Reports of George Wallis and Joseph Whitworth 1854. Edinburgh, Scotland, 1969.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. Proprietary Capitalism: The Textile Manufacture at Philadelphia, 1800-1885. New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Showalter, Dennis E. Railroads and Rifles: Soldiers, Technology, and the Unification of Germany. Hamden, Conn., 1975.Google Scholar
Smith, George Winston. Medicines for the Union Army. Madison, Wisc., 1962.Google Scholar
Smith, Merritt Roe. Harpers Ferry Armory and the New Technology: The Challenge of Change. Ithaca, N.Y., 1977.Google Scholar
Stansell, Christine. City of Women: Sex and Class in New York, 1789-1860. Urbana, Ill. 1987.Google Scholar
Stiles, Henry R., ed. The Civil, Political, Professional and Ecclesiastical History and Commercial and Industrial Record of the County of Kings and the City of Brooklyn, N.Y. from 1683 to 1884, vol. 2. New York, 1884.Google Scholar
Temple, J. H. History ofthe Town ofPalmer, Massachusetts. Palmer, Mass., 1889.Google Scholar
Trumbull, L. R. A History of Industrial Paterson. Paterson, N. J., 1882.Google Scholar
Van Creveld, Martin. Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton. New York, 1977.Google Scholar
Van Creveld, Martin. Technology and War from 2000 B.C. to the Present. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Van Wyck, Anne. Descendants of Cornelius Barentse Van Wyck and Anna Polhemus. New York, 1912.Google Scholar
Vandiver, Frank E. Ploughshares into Swords: Josiah Gorgas and Confederate Ordnance. Austin, Texas, 1952.Google Scholar
Weber, Thomas. The Northern Railroads in the Civil War, 1861-1865. New York 1952.Google Scholar
Weigley, Russell F. Quartermaster General of the Union Army: A Biography of M. C. Meigs. New York, 1959.Google Scholar
Wetzler, Peter. War and Subsistence: The Sambre and Meuse Army in 1794. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Wilentz, Sean. Chants Democratic: New York City & the Rise of the American Working Class, 1788-1850. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Winslow, Richard E., III. Constructing Munitions ofWar: The Portsmouth Navy Yard Confronts the Confederacy, 1861-1865. Portsmouth, N.H., 1995.Google Scholar
Zakim, Michael. “Ready-Made Democracy: Dressing the Republic for Commercial Success.” Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1998.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine. “Factories, Workshops, and Industrial Organisation.” In The Economic History of Britain since 1700, vol. 1: 1700-1860, ed. Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Deirdre. 2d ed. New York, 1994, pp. 123–50.Google Scholar
Brewington, M. V.The Sailmaker's Gear.American Neptune 9 (1949): 278–96.Google Scholar
Brown, Harry. “The Fleece and the Loom: Wool Growers and Wool Manufacturers during the Civil War Decade.Business HistoryReview 29 (1955): 127.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr.,Du Pont, Dahlgren, and the Civil War Nitre Shortage.Military Affairs 13 (1949): 142–49.Google Scholar
Church, Roy. “New Perspectives on the History of Products, Firms, Marketing, and Consumers in Britain and the United States since the Mid-Nineteenth Century.Economic HistoryReview 52 (1999): 405–35.Google Scholar
Crouzet, Francois. “Recherches sur la Production d'Armements en France (1815-1913).Revue Historique 251 (1974): 4584.Google Scholar
Crouzet, Francois. “Remarques sur l'Industrie des Armements en France (du Milieu du XIXe Siecle a 1914).Revue Historique 251 (1974): 409–22.Google Scholar
Gallman, J. Matthew. “Entrepreneurial Experiences in the Civil War: Evidence from Philadelphia.” In American Economic Development in Historical Perspective, ed. Weiss, Thomas and Schaefer, Donald. Stanford, Calif., 1994, pp. 205–22, 299303.Google Scholar
Godley, Andrew. “Introduction: The Development of the Clothing Industry: Technology and Fashion.Textile History 28 (1997): 310.Google Scholar
Hall, Elton W.Sailcloth for American Vessels.American Neptune 31 (1971): 130–45.Google Scholar
Hancock, Harold B., and Wilkinson, Norman B.. “A Manufacturer in Wartime: Du Pont, 1860-1865.Business History Review 40 (1966): 213–36.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Mark, “Sailmakers: The Maintenance of the Craft Traditions in the Age of Steam.” In Divisions ofLabour: Skilled Workers and Technological Change in Nineteenth-Century England, ed. Harrison, Royden and Zeitlin, Jonathan. Urbana, Ill., 1985, pp. 87113.Google Scholar
McKernan, Anne. “War, Gender, and Industrial Innovation: Recruiting Women Weavers in Early Nineteenth-Century Ireland.Journal of Social History 28 (1994): 109–24.Google Scholar
Samuel, Raphael. “Workshop of the World: Steam Power and Hand Technology in Mid-Victorian Britain.History Workshop 3 (1977): 672.Google Scholar
Still, William N.Monitor Companies: A Study of the Major Firms That Built the USS Monitor.American Neptune 48 (1988): 106–30.Google Scholar
Treblicock, Clive. “Science, Technology, and the Armaments Industry in the UK and Europe, with Special Reference to the Period 1880-1914.Journal of European Economic History 22 (1993): 565–80.Google Scholar
Cincinnati Daily Commercial. 1861.Google Scholar
Fincher's Trades Review. 1863.Google Scholar
New York Sun. 1863.Google Scholar
Philadelphia Daily Evening Bulletin. 1861.Google Scholar
Philadelphia North American & U.S. Gazette. 1861.Google Scholar
Abstracts of Contracts Made by Quartermaster's Department. 38th Cong., 2d sess. (1864-65), H. Exec. Doc. 84, ser. 1230.Google Scholar
Amount Paid the Illinois Central Railroad for Transportation. Letter from Secretary of War. 39th Cong., 1st sess. (1865-66), H. Exec. Doc. 83, ser. 1263.Google Scholar
Congressional Record. June-July 1882.Google Scholar
Contracts Made under the Authority of the War Department during 1859. 36th Cong., 1st. sess. (1859-60), H. Exec. Doc. 22, ser. 1047.Google Scholar
Contracts Made by the Ordnance Department, of the War Department. 1868. 40th Cong., 2d. sess. (1867-68), H. Exec. Doc. 99, ser. 1338.Google Scholar
Contracts Made under Authority of the War Department, 1861. 37th Cong., 2d sess. (1861-62), H. Exec. Doc. 101, ser. 1136.Google Scholar
Fitness of Cotton for Tents, &c. 1843. 28th Cong., 1st sess. (1843-44), H. Doc. 4, ser. 439.Google Scholar
Investigation of Government War Contracts, vol. 2. 37th Cong., 2d sess. (1861-62), H. Rep. 2, ser. 1143.Google Scholar
Loan of Tents to the National Association of Veterans of the Mexican War. 1876. 44th Cong., 1st sess. (1875-76), S. Exec. Doc. 67, ser. 1664.Google Scholar
Manufactures ofthe United States in 1860, Compiled from the Original Returns ofthe Eighth Census. Washington, D.C., 1865.Google Scholar
Receipts and Expenditures ofthe United States, 1861. 37th Cong., 2d sess. (1861-62), H. Exec. Doc. 36, ser. 1129.Google Scholar
Receipts and Expenditures ofthe United States, 1867. 42nd Cong., 2d sess. (1871-72), H. Exec. Doc. 29, ser. 1510.Google Scholar
Statement of Contracts bythe War Department for 1860. 36th Cong., 2d sess. (1860-61), H. Exec. Doc. 47, ser. 1099.Google Scholar
Tariff Law of 1857, Alleged Corruption in Securing Its Passage. 1858. 35th Cong., 1st sess. (1857-58), H. Rep. 414, ser. 967.Google Scholar
Tents to the Grand Army ofthe Republic at Gettysburg, Pa. 47th Cong., 2d. sess. (1882-83), 1883, H. Rep. 1998, ser. 2160.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, D.C., 1975.Google Scholar
U.S. War Department. Secretary of War. Annual Reports, 1855-1875. Washington, D.C., 1856-76.Google Scholar
U.S. War Department. War of the Rebellion... Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies. Washington, D.C., 1880-1901.Google Scholar
“Report of John H. Vajen, Quartermaster-General,” in Documents of the General Assembly of Indiana, 42d sess., part 2, vol. 1. Indianapolis, Ind., 1863.Google Scholar
“Report of the Board of Army Auditors,Illinois Reports to the General Assembly. Springfield, Ill., 1865.Google Scholar
“Report of the Joint Select Committee,Journal of the Assembly of Wisconsin, 14th sess. Madison, Wisc., 1862.Google Scholar
“Report of the Majority of the Select Committee on . . . the Transactions of the State Military Board,” Document no. 194, Documents ofthe Assembly of the State of New York, 85th sess., 1862, vol. 7. Albany, N.Y., 1862.Google Scholar
Report of the Quartermaster General of Illinois, 1863,” in Reports Made to the General Assembly of Illinois, at Its Twenty Third Session, vol. 3. Springfield, Ill., 1865.Google Scholar
Report of the Special Committee Appointed to Inquire into the Military Expenditures of the State during the Last Year.Documents Accompanying the Journal ofthe Senate of the State of Michigan. Lansing, Mich., 1863.Google Scholar
Report[s] of the Auditor General,” 1861-62, in State of Pennsylvania, Reports of the Heads of Departments. Harrisburg, Pa., 1861–63.Google Scholar
Baker Library, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston.Google Scholar
R. G. Dun & Company Collection Google Scholar
Connecticut State Library, U.S. Census, Products of Industry, Manuscript Returns, 1860, 1870 (microfilm) Google Scholar
Indiana State Archives, Indianapolis, Ind.Google Scholar
Adjutant General, Civil War General Correspondence Google Scholar
Maine State Archives Microfilm Publication 517 (U.S. Census, Products of Industry, Manuscript Returns for Maine, 1860)Google Scholar
National Archives, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Record Group 92 (Office of the Quartermaster General) Google Scholar
Record Group 153 (Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Army) Google Scholar
Microfilm Publication M1799 (U.S. Census, Products of Industry, Manuscript Returns for Maryland, 1850) Google Scholar
Microfilm Publication T1157 (U.S. Census, Products of Industry, Manuscript Returns for Pennsylvania, 1860) Google Scholar
Microfilm Publication T1204 (U.S. Census, Products of Industry, Manuscript Returns for Massachusetts, 1860) Google Scholar
New Jersey State Archives Google Scholar
U.S. Census, Products of Industry, Manuscript Returns for New Jersey, 1860 Google Scholar
State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Archives Division, Madison, Wisc.Google Scholar
Executive Department Military Correspondence Google Scholar
Quartermaster Financial Records and Accounts Google Scholar
Assistant Quartermaster Records Google Scholar
U.S. Census. Products of Industry, Manuscript Returns. Seventh Census (1850); Eighth Census (1860); Ninth Census (1870). Google Scholar