Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:23:54.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embedding Big Business. The Political Economy of the 1938 Corporate Tax Reform in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2014

Martin Eriksson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the business–government relations during the policy and decision-making processes that preceded the 1938 corporate tax reform in Sweden. This reform involved creating a new tax system under the turbulent economic conditions of the interwar period. But while literature on tax history has found that such circumstances often disable actors from agreeing on tax policies, a constructive outcome was still reached in the Swedish case. In this regard, it is demonstrated that one crucial factor behind the creation of the 1938 corporate tax reform was the formation of a coalition between the Social Democratic party and the business peak associations around a number of areas where their taxation interests coincided. Here, the Social Democrats agreed to shelter profits from corporations as long as they were managed according to the intentions of their countercyclical economic policy that encouraged industrial investments and employment expansion.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 285 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Andersson, Lars I. Kommunalskatteförmågan under mellankrigstiden. Skatterättvisa i och mellan kommuner. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Benner, Mats. The Politics of Growth. Economic Regulation in Sweden 1930–1994. Lund, Sweden: Arkiv förlag, 1997.Google Scholar
Bergström, Villy. Studies in Swedish Post-War Industrial Investments. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1982.Google Scholar
Cawson, Alan, ed. Organized Interests and the State. Studies in Neo-Corporatism. London: SAGE, 1985.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1982). Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, K.Aktuella skattefrågor. Föredrag hållet vid Sveriges industriförbunds årsmöte den 26 april 1927. Stockholm, Sweden: Centraltryckeriet, 1927.Google Scholar
Daunton, Martin. Trusting Leviathan. The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1799–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter Soskice, David, eds. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hancké, Bob Rhodes, Martin Thatcher, Mark, eds. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Conflict, Contradictions and Complementaries in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh Madsen, Henrik. Policy and Politics in Sweden. Principled Pragmatism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard Schmitter, Phillipe, eds. Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making. London: SAGE, 1982 Google Scholar
Lindahl, Erik. Jämförande beskrivning av industriens beskattning i Sverige och utlandet. Stockholm, Sweden: Centraltryckeriet, 1927.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter. Growing Public. Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century. Volume 1 The Story. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. An Economic History of Sweden. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
OECD. Long-Term Trends in Tax Revenues of OECD Member Countries 1955–1980. Paris: OECD, 1981.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan T. Wiseman, Jack. The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart, 1944.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. The Limits of Social Democracy. Investment Politics in Sweden. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Enrique. Offentlig inkomstexpansion. En analys av drivkrafterna bakom de offentliga inkomsternas utveckling i Sverige under 1900-talet. Stockholm, Sweden: LiberFörlag. 1980.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. Den korporativa staten. Intresseorganisationer och statsförvaltning i svensk politik. Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts Juridik, 1992.Google Scholar
Schön, Lennart. Sweden’s Road to Modernity. An Economic History. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag, 2010.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. Taxation and Democracy. Swedish, British and American Approaches to Financing the Welfare State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang Schmitter, Philippe, eds. Private Interest Government. Beyond Market and State. London: Sage, 1985.Google Scholar
Svensson, Torsten. Socialdemokratins dominans. En studie av den svenska socialdemokratins partistrategi. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University, 1994.Google Scholar
United Nations. Incomes in Postwar Europe: A Study of Policies, Growth and Distribution. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations, 1967.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Bohlin, Jan. “Sweden: The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Model.” In European Industrial Policy. The Twentieth Century Experience, edited by Foreman-Peck, James Federico, Giovanni, 152–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Coen, David Grant, Wyn Wilson, Graham. “Political Science Perspectives on Business and Government.” In The Oxford Handbook of Business and Government, edited by Coen, David Grant, Wyn Wilson, Graham, 9–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Elvander, Nils. “Interest Groups in Sweden.” The ANNALS of the Americal Academy of Political and Social Science 413, no. 1 (1974): 27–43.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. “Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective.” In Explaining institutional change. Ambiguity, Agency and Power, edited by Mahoney, James Thelen, Kathleen, 204–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ibata-Arens, Kathryn Dierkes, Julian Zorn, Dirk . “Guest Editors′ Introduction: Theoretical Introduction to the Special Issue on the Embedded Enterprise.” Enterprise & Society 1 (2006): 1–18.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Erik. “The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Model.” Journal of Economic Literature 1 (1985): 1–36.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo. “Business Influence and State Power: The Case of U.S. Corporate Tax Policy.” Politics and Society 2 (1989): 1–52.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. “Maximizing Tax Revenue while Minimizing Political Cost.” Journal of Public Policy 5, no. 3 (1985): 289–320.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” Review of Politics 1 (1974): 85–135.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. “Reflections on Where the Theory of Neo-corporatism Has Gone and Where the Praxis of Neo-Corporatism May Be Going.” In Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making, edited by Lehmbruch, Gerhard Schmitter, Philippe, 259–80. London: SAGE, 1982.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. “Social Democracy vs. Socialism: Goal Adaptation in Social Democracy in Social Democratic Sweden.” Politics & Society 4 (1988): 403–46.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. “Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden and Britain.” World Politics, XLI (1989): 500–35.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 1 (1971): 3–21.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang Schmitter, Philippe. “Community, Market, State – and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order.” In Private Interest Government. Beyond Market and State, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang Schmitter, Philippe, 1–29. London: SAGE, 1985.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang Thelen, Kathleen. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang Thelen, Kathleen, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Archival Sources

Swedish Federation of Industries, Meddelanden från Sveriges Industriförbund 1918–1932.Google Scholar
Swedish Federation of Industries, Board Minutes, 1937–1938.Google Scholar
Swedish National Archives, Committee Archives, the Corporate Tax Commission of 1928, 1928 års bolagsskatteberedning, volume 13, minutes from meetings, 1928–1931.Google Scholar

Legislative and Parliamentary Resources

The Tax Commission of 1924 (1924 års skatteberedning), Betänkande angående beskattning av inländska juridiska personers inkomst och förmögenhet av 1924 års skatteberedning, SOU 1926:18.Google Scholar
The Tax Commission of 1924 (1924 års skatteberedning), Promemorior rörande vissa beskattningsfrågor, SOU 1927:23.Google Scholar
The Corporate Tax Commission of 1928 (1928 års bolagsskatteberedning), Betänkande med förslag till ändrade bestämmelser angående beskattning av aktiebolag och andra näringsföretag m.m. Avgivet den 18 december 1931 av 1928 års bolagsskatteberedning, SOU 1931:40.Google Scholar
The Corporate Tax Commission of 1928 (1928 års bolagsskatteberedning), Betänkande med förslag till ändrade bestämmelser angående beskattning av aktiebolag och andra näringsföretag m.m. Avgivet den 18 december 1931 av 1928 års bolagsskatteberedning. Del II, Särskilda utredningar, SOU 1931:41.Google Scholar
The Tax Commission of 1936 (1936 års skattekommitté), 1936 års skattekommitté. Betänkande med förslag till omläggning av den direkta statsbeskattningen m.m., SOU 1937:42.Google Scholar
The Corporate Tax Commission (Företagsbeskattningskommittén), Förslag till ändrad företagsbeskattning, SOU 1954:19.Google Scholar
Parliamentary documents, Government bills 259/1919, 232/1936, 237/1938, 259/1938, 319/1938.Google Scholar
Parliamentary documents, Report from the Committee of Ways and Means Nr 46/1936.Google Scholar