Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:57:16.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caveat Emptor: Abolishing Public Measurements, Standardizing Quantities, and Enhancing Market Transparency in the London Coal Trade c1830

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Aashish Velkar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article evaluates efforts to standardize quantities in the London coal trade c1830, and traces the end of the public measurement system first introduced in the fourteenth century. Increasing traffic in coal, reduction of taxes on the commodity, inefficient public meters, etc., contributed to the demise of public measurements. This outcome was the result of extensive negotiations between merchants, the various levels of state bureaucracy, and the parliament. Switching measurement standards was difficult, if not costly, to coordinate. Abolishing public measurements and switching from volume to weight measurements was part of the efforts to strengthen governance along the commodity chain, secure property rights by making quantities predictable and alter a mechanism that powerful merchants considered had become inappropriate.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 281 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2008. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Ashton, Thomas S., and Sykes, Joseph. The Coal Industry of the Eighteenth Century. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Ashworth, William J. Customs and Excise: Trade, Production, and Consumption in England, 1640–1845. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William. Prices and Wages in England: From the Twelfth to the Nineteenth century. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1939.Google Scholar
Connor, Robert Dickson. The Weights and Measures of England. London: HMSO, 1987.Google Scholar
Dale, Hylton B. The Fellowship of Woodmongers: Six Centuries of the London Coal Trade. First published c1922 by Coal merchant and Shipper. London.Google Scholar
Danvers, F.C., On Coal – With Reference to its Screening, Transport, etc. London: W.H. Allen & Co, 1872.Google Scholar
Edington, Robert. Essay on the Coal Trade. London, 1803.Google Scholar
Flinn, Michael W. The History of the British Coa! industry. Vol. 2, 1700–1830. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Hatcher, John. The History of the British Coal industry. Vol. 1, Before–1700. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hill, Lowell D. Grain, Grades and Standards: Historical Issues Shaping the Future. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kula, Witold. Measures and Men. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Pasley, C.W. Observations on the Expediency and Practicability of Simplifying and Improving the Measures, Weights and Money. London: Egerton’s Military Library, 1834.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Smith, Raymond. Sea-Coal for London: History of the Coal Factors in the London Market. London: Longhams, 1961.Google Scholar
Sweezy, Paul M. Monopoly and Competition in the English Coal Trade: 1550– 1850. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Taylor, John T. The Archaeology of the Coal Trade. Newcastle: Frank Graham, 1858.Google Scholar
Norton Wise, M., ed.The Values of Precision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Zupko, Ronald Edward. Revolution in Measurement: Western European Weights and Measures since the Age of Science. Philadelphia, PA: The American Philosophical Society, 1990.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

“On the coal trade,” Edinburgh Review 51 (1830): 176–93.Google Scholar
Adell, Rebecca. “The British Metrological Standardization Debate, 1756–1824: The Importance of Parliamentary Sources in its Reassessment,” Parliamentary History 22 (2003): 165–82.Google Scholar
Alder, Ken. “A Revolution to Measure: The Political Economy of the Metric System in the Ancient Régime.” In The Values of Precision, ed. Wise, M.N.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. “Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes,” Journal of Institutional Economics 3 (2007): 1–31.Google Scholar
Barzel, Yoram. “Measurement Costand the Organization of Markets.” Journal of Law and Economics 25 (1982): 27–48.Google Scholar
Brackenborough, Susie, Tom, Mclean, and Oldroyd, David. “The Emergence of Discounted Cash Flow Analysis in the Tyneside Coal Industry c1700–1820.” British Accounting Review 33 (2001): 137–55.Google Scholar
Cowan, Robin. “Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-In.” Journal ofEconomic History 50 (1990): 541–67.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75 (1985): 332–37.Google Scholar
Daviron, Benoit, “Small Farm Production and the Standardization of Tropical Products.” Journal of Agrarian Change 2 (2002): 162–84.Google Scholar
Davis, James. “Baking for the Common Good: A Reassessment of the Assize of Bread in Medieval England.” Economic History Review 57 (2004): 465¬502.Google Scholar
Dietz, B. “The North-East Coal Trade, 1550–1750: Measures, Markets and the Metropolis.” Northern History 22 (1986): 280–94.Google Scholar
Duguid, Paul. “Developing the Brand: The Case of Alcohol, 1800–1880.” Enterprise & Society 4 (2003): 405–41.Google Scholar
Dumbell, Stanley. “The Sale of Corn in the Nineteenth century.” Economic Journal 35 (1925): 141–5.Google Scholar
Favereau, Olivier, Olivier, Biencourt, and Eymard-Duvernay, François. “Where do Markets come from? From (quality) Conventions!” In Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization, ed. Favereau, O. and Lazega, E. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Richard K., and Macve, Richard H. “Coals from Newcastle: an Evaluation of Alternative Frameworks for Interpreting the Development of Cost and Management Accounting in Northeast Coal Mining during the British Industrial Revolution.” Accounting and Business Research 32 (2002): 133–52.Google Scholar
Forrester, R.B. “Commodity Exchanges in England.” Annals ofthe American Academy of Political and Social Science 155 (1931): 196–207.Google Scholar
Hall, T.Y. “Remarks on the Coal Trade.” Transactions of the North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers 2 (1853–54): 104–236.Google Scholar
Knick Harley, C. “Coal Exports and British Shipping, 1850–1913.” Explorations in Economic History 26 (1989): 311–38.Google Scholar
Hausman, William J. “Cheap Coals or Limitation of the Vend? London Coal Trade, 1770–1845.” Journal of Economic History 44 (1984): 321–28.Google Scholar
Hausman, William J. “Market Power in London Coal Trade: The Limitation of the Vend, 1770–1845.” Explorations in Economic History 21 (1984): 383–405.Google Scholar
Hausman, William J. “The English Coastal Coal Trade, 1691–1910: How Rapid was Productivity Growth?” Economic History Review 40 (1987): 588–96.Google Scholar
Hoppit, Julian. “; Reforming Britain’s Weights and Measures, 1660–1824.” English Historical Review 108 (1993): 82–104.Google Scholar
Jacobides, Michael G., Thorbjorn, Knudsen, and Augier, Mie. “Benefitting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures.” Research Policy 35 (2006): 1200–1221.Google Scholar
Jaffe, J.A., “Competition and the Size of Firms in the North-East Coal Trade, 1800–1850.” Northern History 25 (1989): 235–55.Google Scholar
Kenwood, A.G., “Capital Investment in Docks, Harbours, and River Improvements in North-Eastern England 1825–1850.” Journal of Transport History 1 – New Series (1971): 69–84.Google Scholar
Mott, R.A. “The London and Newcastle Chaldrons for Measuring Coal.” In Archaeologia Aeliana, ed. Philipson, J. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: The Society of Antiquaries, 1962.Google Scholar
O’Brien, P.K., “The Political Economy of British Taxation, 1660–1815.” Economic History Review 411 (1988): 1–32.Google Scholar
Pirrong, Stephen Craig. “The Efficient Scope of Private Transactions-Cost-Reducing Institutions: The Successes and Failures of Commodity Exchanges.” Journal of Legal studies 24 (1995): 229–55.Google Scholar
Pollard, Sidney. “Capitalism and Rationality: A Study of Measurements in British Coal Mining, ca. 1750–1850.” Explorations in Economic History 20 (1983): 110–29.Google Scholar
Ponte, Stefano, and Gibbon, Peter. “Quality Standards, Conventions and the Governance of Global Value Chains.” Economy and Society 34 (2005): 1–31.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. “Objectivity as Standardization: The Rhetoric of Impersonality in Measurement, Statistics, and Cost-Benefit Analysis.” In Rethinking Objectivity, ed. Megill, A. London: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. “Metrology, Metrication and Victorian Values.” In Victorian Science in Context, ed. Lightman, B. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Spring, David. “The Earls of Durham and the Great Northern Coal Field, 1830¬1880.” Canadian Historical Review 33 (1952): 237–53.Google Scholar
Stern, Walter M. “The First London Dock Boom and the Growth of the West India Docks.” Economica 19 (1952): 59–77.Google Scholar
Thèvenot, Laurent. “Organized Complexity: Conventions of Coordination and the Composition of Economic Arrangements.” European Journal of Social Theory 4 (2001).Google Scholar
Ville, Simon. “Defending Productivity Growth in the English Coal Trade during the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” Economic History Review 40 (1987): 597–602.Google Scholar
Ville, Simon. “Total Factor Productivity in the English Shipping Industry: The North-East Coal Trade, 1700–1850.” Economic History Review 39 (1986): 355–70.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice. “The Assize of Bread.” Economic Journal 14 (1904): 196–218.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, John. “A New Paradigm for Economic Analysis?” Economy and Society 26 (1997): 305–39.Google Scholar

Official Publications Statutes

47 George III, C.68, Act for Regulating the Delivery of coals, 1807.Google Scholar
5 George IV C.74, Act for Ascertaining and Establishing on Uniformity of Weights and Measures, 1824 Google Scholar
1 &2 William IV C.76, Act for Regulating Delivery of Coal, 1831.Google Scholar
1 & 2 William IV C.16, Act to Discontinue Duties upon Coals, 1831.Google Scholar
5 & 6 William IV, C.63, Weights and Measures (Amendment) Act, 1835.Google Scholar

Parliamentary Debates

Hansard, New Series, Feb–Mar 1829 (Mar. 24, 1829), London, 1409–13Google Scholar
Hansard, New Series, Mar–Apr 1830 (Mar. 11, 1830), London, 223–24Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers (PP) Google Scholar
House of Commons Reports (1738–65) Vol. 2, Second report of the committee on weights and measures, 1759, London.Google Scholar
House of Commons Reports (1785–1801) Vol. 10, Report from the committee on coal trade, 1800, London.Google Scholar
Journal of the House of Lords Vol. 61, Report from the committee on coal trade, 1829, London.Google Scholar
PP Vol. 8, Report ofthe select committee on coal trade, 1830, London.Google Scholar
PP Vol. 33, Account ofduties charged on coals in London, 1833, London.Google Scholar
PP Vol. VII, Report from select committee on the sale of corn, 1834, London.Google Scholar
PP Vol. XI, Report of the select committee on coal trade, 1836, London.Google Scholar

Corporation ofLondon Records

Common Council Committee Papers, Corporation of London Records Office (CLRO), London.Google Scholar
Common Council Reports, CLRO, London.Google Scholar
Chamberlain’s Department Papers, CLRO, London.Google Scholar
Coal and Corn Committee Papers, CLRO, London.Google Scholar
Coal Meters Committee Papers, Guildhall Library, London.Google Scholar