Article contents
Extract
Unlike several of my colleagues whose retrospective essays are included in this special section, I did not have a personal relationship with Alfred DuPont Chandler, though during the 1980s he did invite me to present a discussion of my first book Proprietary Capitalism at his Harvard business history seminar. I also met Dr. Chandler frequently at Business History Conference meetings, where I found him ever-gracious, indifferent to criticism, and supportive of diverse projects whether allied with or tangential to his own. Thus here I offer some reflections on our discipline and its current situation, taking Chandler's publications as a point of departure.
- Type
- Arthur Chandler Tribute
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2008. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.
References
1. Bauman, Zygmunt Liquid Modernity. Oxford: Polity, 2002, 113.Google Scholar
2. ibid., 115.
3. Ulrich Beck, Richard Sennett, Manuel Castells, Bruno Latour, Anthony Giddens, and Michel Foucault, for example.
4. Bauman, , 117. “The long term, though still referred to by habit, is a hollow shell carrying no meaning.” (125)Google Scholar
5. Bauman, 128. In another vocabulary, and in relation to current day sub-prime mortgages and meltdowns in housing’s financial markets, this can also be characterized as privatizing gains and socializing losses.
6. From Barbara Johnson’s introduction to Derrida, Jacques Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981, 15,CrossRefGoogle Scholar cited in Scott, Joan Wallach “History-Writing as Critique.” In Manifestos for History, Jenkins, Keith et al., eds., New York: Routledge, 23.Google Scholar
7. Ken Lipartito urged just this critical revisiting of the discipline’s key concepts and assumptions in his incoming E&S editor's seminar at Bocconi University (2005). I hope during my term as editor to assist in developing this effort.
- 9
- Cited by